Wow, great example of ignorance mixed with arrogance. Stand by numbers that you admit count individuals multiple times, and have no relevance to proving if we have an open border or a closed border. The fact that all you got out of what I said, is that I mistakenly typed biological instead of biometric, says it all. it's like you are incapable of realizing that a simple mistake was made. Fuck me for being up 4 hours past my normal bed time and being tired. all while you completey ignore basic facts of statistics.
I didn't veer off of anything, or go into a rant. I even clarified what I meant about deduplication, and tried to get you to realize that the terminalogy you are trying to use, is not the same when it comes to border tracking statistics. It's like you are just skimming thru my posts, not actually reading or comprehending anything I have said. It's like you have no clue what statistics are, how they are gathered, or what the terminalogy used means. It seems you don't even understand how your biometric data plays a roll in that statistical data. It's like you are only capable of seeing things from the perspective of your industry and nothing else. Which is why you don't seem to understand I was trying to help you from making it appear you are using manipulation to argue a point because all we can see are statistics we can look up.
Tell you what.. go ask your boss, why do the border tracking statistic numbers, not align with the numbers you see in your biometric collected data. Ask why do the statistics consider interactions and encounters two different things, when in the biometric data world, encounters means interations. yet encoutners means something different when it comes to statistics and the border. (your misinterpretation of what encounters means where it comes to statistics of boarder traffic is what partiually lead us down this path) While you are at it, ask them if the biometric data you are collecing is proof of the US having an open border or a closed border, and what's different now than when Biden was in office. (the reason you brought up the 2.5M encounters and put us on the path of arguing about the difference). You can even tell him you are aksing because of a dicussion you had with some "insert what every name you want to call me" to make yourself feel superior. Lets see if your boss understand the difference and explains it to you. But of couse, you have to be genuine when/if you actually have the integrity to ask your boss such questions.
Also, back to the earlier protion of this discussion, you have to realize that all the general population has to go on, is the statistics we can look up. To the general population, your biometric data encounter numbers are unverifiable.. aka come across as made up.
anyhow I am going to get some sleep. Have a good day.