Rush to Obama: Fight Me or I'll Own the U.S.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Originally posted by: ericlp
This guy is on crack again. Doctors proscribing it to him again?

Hmmmmm.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theno...3/rush-to-potus-b.html

Could you Imagine Obama flying out to talk to Rush? It would be like talking to a wall or talking to PJ. Nothing...Zip...Nada would come out of it other then rush screaming his lungs out and over talking on all the points.

If anyone read the actual transcript on his website, Rush did not say it was a fight over who will own America. He said to Obama, if you win, you will own America.

Classic misquotation, and it's no surprise you guys eat it up.
Yeah it's fun to characterize Butterbaugh as a pompous self important gasbag because he just happens to be a pompous self important gasbasg

I suppose instead of jumping to conclusions you could realize that the OP misquoted the actual fact in order to inflame tempers.
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: ericlp
Could you Imagine Obama flying out to talk to Rush? It would be like talking to a wall or talking to PJ. Nothing...Zip...Nada would come out of it other then rush screaming his lungs out and over talking on all the points.

Rush is more patriotic than half the members of the Obama team. He paid his taxes.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Originally posted by: ericlp
This guy is on crack again. Doctors proscribing it to him again?

Hmmmmm.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theno...3/rush-to-potus-b.html

Could you Imagine Obama flying out to talk to Rush? It would be like talking to a wall or talking to PJ. Nothing...Zip...Nada would come out of it other then rush screaming his lungs out and over talking on all the points.

If anyone read the actual transcript on his website, Rush did not say it was a fight over who will own America. He said to Obama, if you win, you will own America.

Classic misquotation, and it's no surprise you guys eat it up.
Yeah it's fun to characterize Butterbaugh as a pompous self important gasbag because he just happens to be a pompous self important gasbasg

I suppose instead of jumping to conclusions you could realize that the OP misquoted the actual fact in order to inflame tempers.
Yeah like that never ever happens in this forum:roll:
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Originally posted by: ericlp
This guy is on crack again. Doctors proscribing it to him again?

Hmmmmm.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theno...3/rush-to-potus-b.html

Could you Imagine Obama flying out to talk to Rush? It would be like talking to a wall or talking to PJ. Nothing...Zip...Nada would come out of it other then rush screaming his lungs out and over talking on all the points.

If anyone read the actual transcript on his website, Rush did not say it was a fight over who will own America. He said to Obama, if you win, you will own America.

Classic misquotation, and it's no surprise you guys eat it up.

If you take me out, if you can wipe me out in a debate and prove to the rest of America that what I say is senseless and wrong, do you realize you will own the United States of America? You will have no opposition.
HA! the actual quote is even worse than I thought. This has nothing to do with any type of misquote. The actual quote is far worse than "Fight Me or I'll Own the U.S." At least the OPs thread title implies that Rush is fighting for "owning the US." In Rush's actual quote, he implies that he already OWNS the US!!!

The implication above is that Rush is the only thing standing between Obama and "owning" the United States of America.

You don't think that is a little bit pompous? a little bit condescending? delusions of grandeur? on the part of Rush? What do you think GOP party leaders would have to say (under their breath of course) about that comment? do you think THEY have anything to do with being the opposition party?

HA! Rush followers have their heads so far up either his ass or their own ass to not see the
hot air blowing out of El Rushbo. It's sad.
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
Here is a great read by a conservative writer/blogger (I don't know who the hell he is to be honest) But I think he nails the issue on the nose. Also, his equating Rush of the 00s to Jesse Jackson of the 80s raised my eyebrows.

But what about the rest of the party? Here?s the duel that Obama and Limbaugh are jointly arranging:

On the one side, the president of the United States: soft-spoken and conciliatory, never angry, always invoking the recession and its victims. This president invokes the language of ?responsibility,? and in his own life seems to epitomize that ideal: He is physically honed and disciplined, his worst vice an occasional cigarette. He is at the same time an apparently devoted husband and father. Unsurprisingly, women voters trust and admire him.

And for the leader of the Republicans? A man who is aggressive and bombastic, cutting and sarcastic, who dismisses the concerned citizens in network news focus groups as ?losers.? With his private plane and his cigars, his history of drug dependency and his personal bulk, not to mention his tangled marital history, Rush is a walking stereotype of self-indulgence ? exactly the image that Barack Obama most wants to affix to our philosophy and our party. And we?re cooperating! Those images of crowds of CPACers cheering Rush?s every rancorous word ? we?ll be seeing them rebroadcast for a long time.


newmajority.com

 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Fears of a Clown

Smarter Republicans know he is not good for them. As the conservative writer David Frum said recently, ?If you?re a talk radio host and you have five million who listen and there are 50 million who hate you, you make a nice living. Ifyou?re a Republican party, you?re marginalized.?

Race is an obsession with Limbaugh, one of the threads I noticed on those long drives on country roads.

When Colin Powell endorsed Obama during the campaign, Limbaugh said it was entirely because of race. After the election, Powell said the way for the party, which has been his home, to regain its footing was to say the Republican Party must stop ?shouting at the world.?

In 2003, Limbaugh said quarterback Donovan McNabb was overrated because the media wanted a black to succeed. Over the next six years, McNabb threw for nearly 150 touchdowns and went to a Super Bowl.

Of late, Limbaugh has wondered why he has trouble with women. His base is white, male, Republican ? people the party has to stop pandering to if it hopes to govern soon.

It?s little wonder that the thrice-married Limbaugh, who uses ?femi-Nazi,? ?info-babe? and ?PMSNBC?, among his monikers for women, can?t get a date with that demographic.

For Democrats, this is all going to plan. It was James Carville and associates who first cooked up associating Limbaugh with the opposition, as Politico reported. Then on Sunday, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel said Limbaugh was the ?voice and the intellectual force and energy behind the Republican Party.?

The Limbaugh Liability

When Obama first mentioned Limbaugh in a meeting with Republicans during his second week in office, he was chastised for elevating him in a way that didn't befit a president. But it quickly became clear that any contest between Barack and Rush was not really a contest at all?and that this is a fight the president is happy to have.

The president's popularity is in the 60s, and the entertainer's, according to internal Democratic polling, is in the 20s. So Rahm Emanuel and Robert Gibbs are now piling on, describing Limbaugh as the "intellectual force" and "de facto chairman" of the party.

Dirty tricks, but rather effective.
 

eleison

Golden Member
Mar 29, 2006
1,319
0
0
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: ericlp
Could you Imagine Obama flying out to talk to Rush? It would be like talking to a wall or talking to PJ. Nothing...Zip...Nada would come out of it other then rush screaming his lungs out and over talking on all the points.

Rush is more patriotic than half the members of the Obama team. He paid his taxes.

Hahaha
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: ericlp
Could you Imagine Obama flying out to talk to Rush? It would be like talking to a wall or talking to PJ. Nothing...Zip...Nada would come out of it other then rush screaming his lungs out and over talking on all the points.

Rush is more patriotic than half the members of the Obama team. He paid his taxes.
And he avoided serving his country because he had a pimple on his ass.
 

BMW540I6speed

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2005
1,055
0
0
Limbaugh, the entertainer, you know one of the "rich" hollywood elites that he and his base despise, is heard aloud as a leader of the conservatives. Key speaker for them at CPAC. John Boehner got out of his tanning booth for this?. Who cares what Boehner says? It's not a official Republican message until Limbaugh approves it. If the GOP is so eager to take the emphasis off of Limbaugh, someone is going to need to state that he is an incendiary entertainer and stand behind their statement. Anyone that dare even criticize him for even his most radical statements will be shamed and have their careers with the republicans ruined. (Hello Micheal Steele)

It seems the Conservatives are searching for their footing from the history of Reagan. They have forgotten about his dotage, his cue cards, his guileless Nancy, his California experience. He was outrageously cruel to students, to the aged, to the educated. He built his politics with fear mongering about communism. He nearly created the cold war with the folks of Orange County, the John Birch Society, Walter Knott, and Richard Nixon.

They are hanging on, looking for a familiar place to stand. They are searching history, they are seeking the old, the former, the John Wayne time. The conservatives crave, desperately, to return to the time of happy parades, when the high school team was the talk of the town, to the time when they felt innocent. It is in the past.

Don't look for President Obama's vision in the past. These times require creativity, innovation, drive, and hope. Look to the philosophers, the thinkers, the visionaries. Trust that our science can improve. Limbaugh, Colter, Palin, are messengers of fear and protest.

These people are actually powerless. There is no way that they can take the country back into this fictional history. Circumstances propel the country into now and the only way we can deal with any of it is to be present. We wondered where Bush's ignorance could take us. Now we know. He brought us right to now, and now is the only place any of us can be. We need to work to stay present and to support those who are willing to lead towards the future, out of the now.

It was Nixon who got the Klan and the religious fanatics to board the Republican bus to nowhere 40 years ago. The upstanding cloth coat Republicans, with their gay friends (and kids) and their staid, respectable churches made a deal with the devil, and let the stinking, drooling, third of the American population onboard the bus in return for broad electoral dominance and low taxes on their - by this point - almost entirely unearned riches. Inheritance and position were freely handed down from one generation of out-of-touch kleptocrats to another, until finally even obvious Ponzi schemes like the dot com and real estate bubbles were embraced, defended and promoted at the highest levels. Bush crowing about his beloved "Ownership Society" before Congress af ew years ago.

I can usually avoid the obscure radio stations that carry the contemptuous, negativity of Limbaugh. If conservatives or others cling to his beliefs, they will sink with him, in his bloated ship. A ship that carries only old false fronts. A fiction from the movies of a pretend yesterday. Impersonator, Limbaugh sells a counterfeit world.

Rush thinks he's the leader of these people now, but when the mob gets hungry and restless they're as likely to skin him alive as sing hosannas. You could make a lot of lard from that tub. It should be interesting to watch the Republicans devour one another. They should rename themselves the Donner Party.

 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
BMW - you won't mind if, from now on, I refer to the GOP as the "Donner Party"

would you? :laugh:

that's perfect!
 

RichardE

Banned
Dec 31, 2005
10,246
2
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: yowolabi
When that other thread called Rush the "fat man" I thought they were talking about weight, not ego. Really? A battle to "own the united states". I wonder if he really believes he's the leader of the conservative movement, or if he just sees an opportunity to increase ratings...

There is a reason so many conservatives supported what they thought was economic responsibility in Obama.

Sad to say, if the Republicans as we know them now were in power, they would be spending more than Obama probably. The country was really fucked either way.
Based on what??

Bush's spending was nothing compared to what Obama wants to spend.

Not including 2009 Obama will ad $2 trillion to the deficit in his first term.

Of come off it PJ, the current crop of republicans is not conservative in anything but name. The idea of a multi trillion dollar bailout was being floated around when Bush was in office, before the election people were already calling for it, and Bush had already stated he would push anything through that stimulated the economy.

Face it, this was going to happen either way.
 

chess9

Elite member
Apr 15, 2000
7,748
0
0
Originally posted by: eskimospy
This is awesome. Obama/the Democrats have picked him as an opponent on purpose. Why? Because outside of the rabid Republican base Limbaugh has approval numbers resembling that of Frankenstein. If you aren't a dittohead, chances are you hate that fat piece of shit. Making him the face of the Republican party is an incredibly smart move, and it seems to have played perfectly into Rush's ego.

Letting that idiot be the face of conservatism is a disaster for everyone who actually is a conservative.

Yes, exactly.

And what kind of person goes on radio and/or television BY THEMSELVES and preaches to people? He and Doc Savage and the other mindless preachers of the right wing gospel are megalomaniacs. If you enjoy nuanced conversation, and maybe some intelligent debate, why would you turn on Rush? What you want is either to hear your viewpoint substantiated, or you are wanting political entertainment. As political entertainment it's very weak stuff, IMHO.

-Robert

 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
Mmm I think I'd find a bit of amusement if Rush tried to run for some sort of National office (be it a senate seat or even president).
 

0marTheZealot

Golden Member
Apr 5, 2004
1,692
0
0
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: yowolabi
When that other thread called Rush the "fat man" I thought they were talking about weight, not ego. Really? A battle to "own the united states". I wonder if he really believes he's the leader of the conservative movement, or if he just sees an opportunity to increase ratings...

There is a reason so many conservatives supported what they thought was economic responsibility in Obama.

Sad to say, if the Republicans as we know them now were in power, they would be spending more than Obama probably. The country was really fucked either way.
Based on what??

Bush's spending was nothing compared to what Obama wants to spend.

Not including 2009 Obama will ad $2 trillion to the deficit in his first term.

Of come off it PJ, the current crop of republicans is not conservative in anything but name. The idea of a multi trillion dollar bailout was being floated around when Bush was in office, before the election people were already calling for it, and Bush had already stated he would push anything through that stimulated the economy.

Face it, this was going to happen either way.

:thumbsup:

We need more posts like this one, posts that see beyond blue and red, conservative and liberal.

RichardE is entirely correct. Read his words carefully PJ. Two or three times if you must.
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
Originally posted by: chess9
Originally posted by: eskimospy
This is awesome. Obama/the Democrats have picked him as an opponent on purpose. Why? Because outside of the rabid Republican base Limbaugh has approval numbers resembling that of Frankenstein. If you aren't a dittohead, chances are you hate that fat piece of shit. Making him the face of the Republican party is an incredibly smart move, and it seems to have played perfectly into Rush's ego.

Letting that idiot be the face of conservatism is a disaster for everyone who actually is a conservative.

Yes, exactly.

And what kind of person goes on radio and/or television BY THEMSELVES and preaches to people? He and Doc Savage and the other mindless preachers of the right wing gospel are megalomaniacs. If you enjoy nuanced conversation, and maybe some intelligent debate, why would you turn on Rush? What you want is either to hear your viewpoint substantiated, or you are wanting political entertainment. As political entertainment it's very weak stuff, IMHO.

-Robert
I think you meant Mike Savage...don't be dissing the bronze man!
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
Originally posted by: Aikouka
Mmm I think I'd find a bit of amusement if Rush tried to run for some sort of National office (be it a senate seat or even president).
Hell...if Al Franken can do it! Be careful what you wish for.
 

lupi

Lifer
Apr 8, 2001
32,539
260
126
Originally posted by: Craig234
Gotta love Rush's ideology that he's so much more righteous than Obama because he earns his money - average Americans subsidize Rush for his blathering talk, and average Americans pay Obama's salary for his work for the country. What's really all that difference between the two? I'd say Obama is doing a hell of a lot more good for the country, for a lot less money, than Rush. But Rush's ideology is as usual blind.

This from the man wearing opaque ideologue glasses. A tin cup in his hand.with
 

lupi

Lifer
Apr 8, 2001
32,539
260
126
Originally posted by: Craig234
Gotta love Rush's ideology that he's so much more righteous than Obama because he earns his money - average Americans subsidize Rush for his blathering talk, and average Americans pay Obama's salary for his work for the country. What's really all that difference between the two? I'd say Obama is doing a hell of a lot more good for the country, for a lot less money, than Rush. But Rush's ideology is as usual blind.

This from the man wearing opaque ideologue glasses with a tin cup in his hand.
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: lupi
Originally posted by: Craig234
Gotta love Rush's ideology that he's so much more righteous than Obama because he earns his money - average Americans subsidize Rush for his blathering talk, and average Americans pay Obama's salary for his work for the country. What's really all that difference between the two? I'd say Obama is doing a hell of a lot more good for the country, for a lot less money, than Rush. But Rush's ideology is as usual blind.

This from the man wearing opaque ideologue glasses with a tin cup in his hand.

I see you've got a new 'thing'.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Originally posted by: Slick5150
Best thing Obama can do is ignore him. The guy thrives on attention, and deserves none of it.

Obama and his admin started it.

I don't see them ignoring him until they feel they've wrung out all the usefullness they expect from the situation. I'm not sure what exactly they're aiming for (diversion? or identifying the Repub party closely with Rush?, or he's just the only convenient conservative-type target ATM).

Originally posted by: craftech
For nearly a week now Rush has gotten free publicity from the mainstream corporate media. That is intentional.

Yeah, he's eating it up.

I've heard his ratings are exploding.

I don't understand why so many of you Dems/libs take him so seriously.

He's just an entertainer.

BTW: read Gibbs' rsponse toward the end of the article. The guy sounds painfully inarticulate.

Fern
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,247
55,794
136
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: Slick5150
Best thing Obama can do is ignore him. The guy thrives on attention, and deserves none of it.

Obama and his admin started it.

I don't see them ignoring him until they feel they've wrung out all the usefullness they expect from the situation. I'm not sure what exactly they're aiming for (diversion? or identifying the Repub party closely with Rush?, or he's just the only convenient conservative-type target ATM).

Originally posted by: craftech
For nearly a week now Rush has gotten free publicity from the mainstream corporate media. That is intentional.

Yeah, he's eating it up.

I've heard his ratings are exploding.

I don't understand why so many of you Dems/libs take him so seriously.

He's just an entertainer.

BTW: read Gibbs' rsponse toward the end of the article. The guy sounds painfully inarticulate.

Fern

Why do the Republicans take him so seriously that every time someone says something negative about him they issue a very public apology? Once you figure that out you'll figure out why other people take him seriously.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Fern
-snip-

Why do the Republicans take him so seriously that every time someone says something negative about him they issue a very public apology? Once you figure that out you'll figure out why other people take him seriously.

I've already commented on that.

You don't get into a fight with somebody who buys ink by the barrel.

Or has their own daily nation-wide 3 hour radio talk program.

At least not if you're Republican. That would be stupid.

Fern

 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,247
55,794
136
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Fern
-snip-

Why do the Republicans take him so seriously that every time someone says something negative about him they issue a very public apology? Once you figure that out you'll figure out why other people take him seriously.

I've already commented on that.

You don't get into a fight with somebody who buys ink by the barrel.

Or has their own daily nation-wide 3 hour radio talk program.

At least not if you're Republican. That would be stupid.

Fern

Well I'm saying that's why people take him seriously.