Rush to Obama: Fight Me or I'll Own the U.S.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

MotF Bane

No Lifer
Dec 22, 2006
60,801
10
0
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: Craig234
Gotta love Rush's ideology that he's so much more righteous than Obama because he earns his money - average Americans subsidize Rush for his blathering talk, and average Americans pay Obama's salary for his work for the country. What's really all that difference between the two? I'd say Obama is doing a hell of a lot more good for the country, for a lot less money, than Rush. But Rush's ideology is as usual blind.
How do Americans 'subsidize' Rush??

If he was on PBS you would have a point, but he is not. The 'average' American has nothing to do with Rush's income. Rush makes 100% of his money from people who want to pay him.

Why are you so fucking stupid

20,000,000 fucking idiots tune in everyday .. hmmm
And your point is??

People choose to listen to him and advertisers pay to get theirs heard by his listeners. That is not subsidizing.

Subsidizing is what puts PBS on the air since our tax dollars go to fund their programing.


Shit.. probably half his listeners are on Welfare.. sorry.. but I hate him... he has never done anything good for this society.. ever once

Unlikely that half his listeners are on welfare, given the opinions he voices... but yeah, he's pretty damned useless.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,246
55,794
136
This is awesome. Obama/the Democrats have picked him as an opponent on purpose. Why? Because outside of the rabid Republican base Limbaugh has approval numbers resembling that of Frankenstein. If you aren't a dittohead, chances are you hate that fat piece of shit. Making him the face of the Republican party is an incredibly smart move, and it seems to have played perfectly into Rush's ego.

Letting that idiot be the face of conservatism is a disaster for everyone who actually is a conservative.
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Rush really just does not understand that he is digging the grave of the only party he has any resemblance or loyalty to. The worst thing he can do is keep talking, the administration knows that and they're betting on it. The more he talks, the worse press he gets, and the more political capital BHO gets for his policies, including the bailout Rush vehemently opposes. Just him talking (since everything he says is wrong, of course), causes a domino effect that might even splinter the party. Which may be for the better because more true conservatives will flock to a non-Republican party, but terrible in terms of actually having any political power in Washington since Dems would then outnumber the new split party by at least 2:1.

As if any further proof were needed, the guy just isn't that intelligent. Kudos to him making millions based entirely on essentially HS-level political analysis though, I don't think I would have been able to live with myself.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
16,128
8,716
136
I like Rush for his ability to keep the repubs exactly where the Dems want them to be.

I hate Rush for his ability to keep our Nation divided and gridlocked by spewing outright lies, double speak and innuendo as fact and all of it for the self-interested purpose of enriching his ego and his piggy bank.

Such a sad sad day that shock jock Rush with his sewer pipe mouth speaks to and for the repub base.

Pathetic, really.

Someday in the future the True Conservatives will take back their Party and regain their dignity. One can hope.

 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: Craig234
Gotta love Rush's ideology that he's so much more righteous than Obama because he earns his money - average Americans subsidize Rush for his blathering talk, and average Americans pay Obama's salary for his work for the country. What's really all that difference between the two? I'd say Obama is doing a hell of a lot more good for the country, for a lot less money, than Rush. But Rush's ideology is as usual blind.
How do Americans 'subsidize' Rush??

If he was on PBS you would have a point, but he is not. The 'average' American has nothing to do with Rush's income. Rush makes 100% of his money from people who want to pay him.

Sorry I didn't lay it out in tiny steps for you.

Many average Americans choose to listen to Rush's blather. Part of listening to it is listening to the ads, and being influenced by the ads to give their money to the advertisers. The advertisers pay the broadcasters who broadcast Rush's show for the ad time. The broadcasters pay Rush's production company, who provide the show that the people choose to listen to. The production company pays Rush. Rush blathers.

It's not all that different from the people choosing to have Obama lead them, and then choosing, thorugh the votign process, to pay the president out of their taxes to do so.

PBS? Same - enoiugh people want PBS that their representatives they elected choose to put money towards it. Other people send direct donations, not unlike HBO subscribers.

One difference - PBS is more available with donations optional. HBO is subsciber only, no 'charity subscriptions'.

All of these things have in common that people choose to consume the product, and on average they hand over money to pay for the product - directly or through advertisers.

As I said before, I think Obama does a lot more good for the nation, for a lot less money, than Rush, who blathers for millions of dollars.
 

jackschmittusa

Diamond Member
Apr 16, 2003
5,972
1
0
This Rush/WH thing gets funnier by the minute!

They both know something that the Republicans don't seem to know; Rush doesn't really give a rat's ass about their party. Rush is in this thing to enhance his fame and fortune. It really doesn't matter much to him if his latest turn in the spotlight damages the party. The WH knows this, and hopes they can keep him on the stage until he lays a turd so big the Republicans can't take it anymore. Then they can chuckle as they point out that the Republicans are primarily responsible for giving Rush the opportunity since they never tried to marginalize him.

Eagerly awaiting the next chapter.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Rush is brilliant with this tactic and I've have some admiration for his ability to get what he's after. He wants to have his ego stroked, be in the public eye, and make tons of loot. Obamas staff is providing him with all the above. He knows that a US President will never be summoned. All he needs is to get attention and he's cotton it in spades. The WH needs to stop enabling him. Hell, I issue a challenge for Rush to debate me. I'll raise bus fare and get a tape recorder. :p

 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Obama already made a mistake to ever mention the guy. He should never give him any achknowledgement whatsoever.
 

smashp

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2003
2,443
0
0
Rush doesnt even see the pwnage thats being layed down on him right now. Ultimately it will be the republicans that make him go away
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
I think it could backfire on him... he and his minions are a minority.. and when real conservatives get a listen to him.. they may seek a way to shut him the hell up
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: smashp
Rush doesnt even see the pwnage thats being layed down on him right now. Ultimately it will be the republicans that make him go away

lol.. I started to type before you but was in Wintergrasp.. gaming reference ^^ Agreed
 

misle

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2000
3,371
0
76
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: Craig234
Gotta love Rush's ideology that he's so much more righteous than Obama because he earns his money - average Americans subsidize Rush for his blathering talk, and average Americans pay Obama's salary for his work for the country. What's really all that difference between the two? I'd say Obama is doing a hell of a lot more good for the country, for a lot less money, than Rush. But Rush's ideology is as usual blind.
How do Americans 'subsidize' Rush??

If he was on PBS you would have a point, but he is not. The 'average' American has nothing to do with Rush's income. Rush makes 100% of his money from people who want to pay him.

Sorry I didn't lay it out in tiny steps for you.

Many average Americans choose to listen to Rush's blather. Part of listening to it is listening to the ads, and being influenced by the ads to give their money to the advertisers. The advertisers pay the broadcasters who broadcast Rush's show for the ad time. The broadcasters pay Rush's production company, who provide the show that the people choose to listen to. The production company pays Rush. Rush blathers.

It's not all that different from the people choosing to have Obama lead them, and then choosing, thorugh the votign process, to pay the president out of their taxes to do so.

PBS? Same - enoiugh people want PBS that their representatives they elected choose to put money towards it. Other people send direct donations, not unlike HBO subscribers.

One difference - PBS is more available with donations optional. HBO is subsciber only, no 'charity subscriptions'.

All of these things have in common that people choose to consume the product, and on average they hand over money to pay for the product - directly or through advertisers.

As I said before, I think Obama does a lot more good for the nation, for a lot less money, than Rush, who blathers for millions of dollars.

I think you need to look up the definition of subsidize and subsidy.

Hint: It's not paid advertising.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Well I have to give Rush an E for effort or is it ego.

And here we have a man who has never run for elective office in his life having the gaul to think he can DEMAND to debate the highest elected official in the land.

Usually the challenger has to earn the right to be in the ring with the champ. And that is probably how Obama should handle it. And once Rush is yanked away from his home court where he rigs the outcome by debating only himself,
just about any boob can debate Rush and win. On any facts or logic, Limbaugh will get clobbered.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
^^ His audience were probably huge Palin supporters.. rational thinking humans see a lost debate.. where they see a win
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: Zeppelin2282
I listen to Rush sometimes in the mornings for the LOL's

How this fucking lunatic is allowed to be on the air is absolutely mind boggling. Even more mind boggling are the people that actually take him seriously. The people that call into his show are just as fucking crazy as he is.

Yep. I had a guy tell me 'Rush speaks the 'inconvenient truth' to liberals'. He also defends the war in Iraq even knowing what we know now.
 

craftech

Senior member
Nov 26, 2000
779
4
81
For nearly a week now Rush has gotten free publicity from the mainstream corporate media. That is intentional.
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: dahunan
^^ Remember Rushs response to Abu-Ghraib >> "Just high school pranks"

Or the flailing about in imitation of Michael J Fox? What a tool.
 

Zedtom

Platinum Member
Nov 23, 2001
2,146
0
0
When we talk about egomaniacs, we are playing into their hands. Obama is in a whole different league when it come to an obsession with power. He has paid his dues and earned the right to be the "most powerful man in the world".

Limbaugh has achieved his power base by realizing the ultimate disk jockey wet dream. His fans actually have political clout in addition to their celebrity hero worship.
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
Originally posted by: ericlp
This guy is on crack again. Doctors proscribing it to him again?

Hmmmmm.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theno...3/rush-to-potus-b.html

Could you Imagine Obama flying out to talk to Rush? It would be like talking to a wall or talking to PJ. Nothing...Zip...Nada would come out of it other then rush screaming his lungs out and over talking on all the points.

If anyone read the actual transcript on his website, Rush did not say it was a fight over who will own America. He said to Obama, if you win, you will own America.

Classic misquotation, and it's no surprise you guys eat it up.

If you take me out, if you can wipe me out in a debate and prove to the rest of America that what I say is senseless and wrong, do you realize you will own the United States of America? You will have no opposition.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,893
33,538
136
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: yowolabi
When that other thread called Rush the "fat man" I thought they were talking about weight, not ego. Really? A battle to "own the united states". I wonder if he really believes he's the leader of the conservative movement, or if he just sees an opportunity to increase ratings...

There is a reason so many conservatives supported what they thought was economic responsibility in Obama.

Sad to say, if the Republicans as we know them now were in power, they would be spending more than Obama probably. The country was really fucked either way.
Based on what??

Bush's spending was nothing compared to what Obama wants to spend.

Not including 2009 Obama will ad $2 trillion to the deficit in his first term.

History. The GOP was already spending more then Dems before the economic crisis took hold.

 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Originally posted by: ericlp
This guy is on crack again. Doctors proscribing it to him again?

Hmmmmm.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theno...3/rush-to-potus-b.html

Could you Imagine Obama flying out to talk to Rush? It would be like talking to a wall or talking to PJ. Nothing...Zip...Nada would come out of it other then rush screaming his lungs out and over talking on all the points.

If anyone read the actual transcript on his website, Rush did not say it was a fight over who will own America. He said to Obama, if you win, you will own America.

Classic misquotation, and it's no surprise you guys eat it up.
Yeah it's fun to characterize Butterbaugh as a pompous self important gasbag because he just happens to be a pompous self important gasbasg
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: HomerJS
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: yowolabi
When that other thread called Rush the "fat man" I thought they were talking about weight, not ego. Really? A battle to "own the united states". I wonder if he really believes he's the leader of the conservative movement, or if he just sees an opportunity to increase ratings...

There is a reason so many conservatives supported what they thought was economic responsibility in Obama.

Sad to say, if the Republicans as we know them now were in power, they would be spending more than Obama probably. The country was really fucked either way.
Based on what??

Bush's spending was nothing compared to what Obama wants to spend.

Not including 2009 Obama will ad $2 trillion to the deficit in his first term.

History. The GOP was already spending more then Dems before the economic crisis took hold.


Lol! That's why a $300b omnibus bill was pushed into 2009 to become a $410b omnibus bill.