Rumor: Trump will fire Mueller in 5 days

Page 12 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
zinfamous

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,828
31,304
146
imported_tajmahal said:
How would he have known? It's not that tough, if you can, you use a subpoena or get a warrant. Just to cover your bases.
Click to expand...

But they didn't need one?

Also, what are you worried about? Those guys have nothing to hide, right? It's obvious from their frothing attempts to discredit the FBI investigation into their things that they don't have to hide, right?

I really don't know why you guys keep shitting your pants over this. Just tune into Hannity and drown out everything else. Be safe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Younigue
Younigue

Younigue

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2017
5,888
1,447
106
zinfamous said:
I'm curious about how Trump's fluffer team here and out in the world would react in a situation where the emails show direct, clear, illegal communications with foreign agents and verified collusion. If what we see are actual crimes.

Would the fluffers then continue to do their best to discredit the process? Would they continue to defend an obvious enemy actor against the US because of the need to play team defense? "It doesn't matter if he's a criminal and compromised the security of this country, the wrong papers were filed!" Yes, I understand that there is still nothing wrong with the procedure of the investigation up to his point, but I'm just wondering at what point they actually abandon the criminal.
Click to expand...
Never. They have Fox State Run Media to feed them words to debate with. They are so detached from what's wrong with this Plague that has been set upon us that right and lawful have no room to breed within the party. They don't even really care about what they say Hillary and Obama have done any more, they can't AND believe in what Trump and Twats are doing and have done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trenchfoot
Younigue

Younigue

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2017
5,888
1,447
106
Amused said:
Dude. Seriously. Just stop. I know it's embarrassing to be duped, and I think the uncomfortable reality that you have has just washed over you. You have two choices now. Admit it, learn from it and move on, or double down on stupid.
Click to expand...
It's always doubling down with tajjy or hadn't you noticed?
 
shortylickens

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,081
136
Amused said:
brace-yourself-i-know-you-are-but-what-am-i-comebacks-have-commenced.jpg


Tell me, why hasn't the Trump legal team filed for a court order to quash?

Why?

I'll be waiting.
Click to expand...
Cuz they're incompetent.

Donald spends as much money on his lawyers as he does on his haircuts.
 
Amused

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,300
19,325
146
shortylickens said:
Cuz they're incompetent.

Donald spends as much money on his lawyers as he does on his haircuts.
Click to expand...

I posit in this case they are exactly the opposite. They haven't filed because they know they'll lose in court. So they are trying it in public opinion.

Filing for a quash would be incompetent.
 
J

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
vi edit said:
There's also cases where employees have emailed their lawyers under their employer emails. The court did not rule that it met client/attorney privilege. Had that employee sent an email under their personal email address it would have been. Emails are property of the employer and basically any and all expectation of privacy is gone. It's even less so in the case of state and federal ones that can be part of public record.
Click to expand...

Indeed. The emails in question can likely be obtained via a FOIA request, as well, with only matters of national security redacted. They won't ask your lawyer, either.
 
cytg111

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,013
15,461
136
jackstar7 said:
Which seems more likely? He's an idiot? Or you are?
Click to expand...
Now I may not be a lawyer but thankfully im an expert on everything.. and believe me, Mueller is an idiot. You know and people are saying, just this other day, have never seen, huge idiot believe me, i know. Idiots. Cause I am one. Sick puppy. Little rocket man.
 
  • Like
Reactions: interchange and ch33zw1z
Younigue

Younigue

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2017
5,888
1,447
106
jackstar7 said:
Which seems more likely? He's an idiot? Or you are?
Click to expand...
*rubbing my hands together in anticipation* Voting's fun! I vote... Doc is the idiot! It's not just more likely, it's a given but I didn't want my vote to not be counted. Long live democracy!
 
J

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Amused said:
I posit in this case they are exactly the opposite. They haven't filed because they know they'll lose in court. So they are trying it in public opinion.

Filing for a quash would be incompetent.
Click to expand...

File with whom, with what court? The only charges pending are against Manafort & he wasn't part of the transition team.
 
imported_tajmahal

imported_tajmahal

Lifer
Jul 9, 2009
10,758
2,086
136
zinfamous said:
But they didn't need one?

Also, what are you worried about? Those guys have nothing to hide, right? It's obvious from their frothing attempts to discredit the FBI investigation into their things that they don't have to hide, right?

I really don't know why you guys keep shitting your pants over this. Just tune into Hannity and drown out everything else. Be safe.
Click to expand...
I still remember the frantic attacks against Special prosecutor Starr by the Clinton administration. Nothing really new under the sun with the present day attacks on Mueller.
http://www.nytimes.com/1998/03/02/u...ack-on-starr-is-paying-off-with-his-help.html
 
zinfamous

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,828
31,304
146
imported_tajmahal said:
I still remember the frantic attacks against Special prosecutor Starr by the Clinton administration. Nothing really new under the sun with the present day attacks on Mueller.
http://www.nytimes.com/1998/03/02/u...ack-on-starr-is-paying-off-with-his-help.html
Click to expand...

Too bad they didn't get that Starr guy--another republican--to investigate potential crimes against the state, right? They didn't even bother asking him to do that against Clinton.

But yeah, totally the same thing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom