SP33Demon
Lifer
- Jun 22, 2001
- 27,928
- 143
- 106
Are you serious? What should we have been thinking about while every decision made by each crew member was idiotic? EVEN if one understood the story fully without seeing any Scott interviews, the actual script and character development are a joke. People that don't think the movie was great have pointed out a thousand reasons for this opinion, while people saying this was a good/great/amazing/epic have nothing more to say other than the haters are 'dumb'.
Also I'm not sure how to depict technology in movies as it advances in real life, but really seeing low res blurry video feeds was laughable to me. Its 100 years from now, I didn't need to see optic nerve communication, but how about iphone level quality? If he is intent on creating such a believable world you need to have some level of uniformity. Having fucking holograms in the same movie as video cameras from my LG VX6000 is a joke to a lot of people. What if they were using cans with strings attached to communicate?
EDIT: this thread has 300 replies because the movie has been hyped for 2 years as a genre defining flick but it turns out it was only slightly better than Mission to Mars.
The quality was fine, and when it wasn't fine it was because of the storm. You're whining about something that is stupid.
If you're going to whine, how about the 2 guys who were in charge of mapping that wanted to leave early because they were scared. And then end up stuck in there overnight when they could clearly hear on the comm system that they had to get out in 15 minutes? That is a lot more legit than omgscreensweren't1920X1080!