Richland & Kabini rumours

Page 18 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Great find almost reads like the BD stuff right up till the ugly truth raised its head .
 

mrmt

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2012
3,974
0
76
Wow man, nice find! :thumbsup:
Kabini and Temash were expected to bring some massive perf/watt gains over previous low power Brazos offerings,but Richland and 40% increase?.

A move from VLIW to GNC wouldn't yields a 40% increase in GPU compute power in the same TDP? I find this hypothesis far more plausible than some magic dust that would allow 40% increase in clock speed at the same power level.
 

inf64

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2011
3,702
4,027
136
Indeed it could be just a figure for GPU perf. increase. We just don't know what it is yet. If it's done on 28nm it can be new GPU+clock bump.
 

boxleitnerb

Platinum Member
Nov 1, 2011
2,601
2
81
We don't know, because there are no 40nm GCN products to my knowledge. GCN might ensure that additional units scale better or that available computing power is used more efficiently, but the majority of the improvements seem to come from the process shrink.
 

mrmt

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2012
3,974
0
76
Indeed it could be just a figure for GPU perf. increase. We just don't know what it is yet. If it's done on 28nm it can be new GPU+clock bump.

I'm talking about GPGPU specifically, not GPU overall.
 

Olikan

Platinum Member
Sep 23, 2011
2,023
275
126
We don't know, because there are no 40nm GCN products to my knowledge. GCN might ensure that additional units scale better or that available computing power is used more efficiently, but the majority of the improvements seem to come from the process shrink.

nop, under the same shaders/clocks the GCN is generaly faster than VLIW-4
 

FlanK3r

Senior member
Sep 15, 2009
312
37
91
Up to 4.4GHz? I thought GloFo's 28nm process netted lower clocks (but much lower TDPs) :confused:

I thought that this was part of the reason SR was moved to 2014. It doesn't matter if you get a ~30% IPC boost if you lose the benefit due to lower clocks (that and $$s for back end OPs).


Dont forget, the big size of die (and about half of power consumption in load) making UNB+iGPU part. Not core size+L2. ANd this iGPU is much perform than anything else in integreted PC systems.
 

mrmt

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2012
3,974
0
76
Dont forget, the big size of die (and about half of power consumption in load) making UNB+iGPU part. Not core size+L2. ANd this iGPU is much perform than anything else in integreted PC systems.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/5261/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review/25

You just look have to look at those benchmarks. There is a huge difference between GNC and VLIW4 in GPU compute power. With that data it isn't hard to fathom a 40% increase from Trinity to Richland even at the same die size and with same clocks.

On top of that to expect a 40% clock increase from a half-node shrink is wishful thinking, or believe that GLF 32nm SOI is botched high time, but then you would have to ask why they went for such a process.

The 40% number also matches AMD policy of cherry-picking specific benchmarks and selling them to the public as a general performance increase.
 

SiliconWars

Platinum Member
Dec 29, 2012
2,346
0
0
On top of that to expect a 40% clock increase from a half-node shrink is wishful thinking, or believe that GLF 32nm SOI is botched high time, but then you would have to ask why they went for such a process.

I'm sure I wouldn't have to look very hard to find a post of yours telling us how bad GF's 32nm is. So is it or not?
 

mrmt

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2012
3,974
0
76
I'm sure I wouldn't have to look very hard to find a post of yours telling us how bad GF's 32nm is. So is it or not?

It's the same GLF that delivered 32nm SOI that will deliver 28nm bulk, so what's your point?
 

inf64

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2011
3,702
4,027
136
We haven't seen bulk node from GloFo so we cannot judge it yet.
 

SiliconWars

Platinum Member
Dec 29, 2012
2,346
0
0
It's the same GLF that delivered 32nm SOI that will deliver 28nm bulk, so what's your point?

Yes and the same intel delivered 90nm and 45nm. The same GF delivered 65nm and 45nm. The same TSMC delivered 40nm and 28nm.

That would be my point.
 

AtenRa

Lifer
Feb 2, 2009
14,001
3,357
136
AMD also introduced the new “Richland” APU, which is currently shipping to OEMs, which delivers a 40 percent increase in performance over the previous generation of A-Series APUs. “Richland” is expected to come bundled with new software for consumers such as gesture and facial recognition to dramatically expand and enhance consumers’ user experiences. The follow-on to “Richland” will be the 28nm “Kaveri” APU with revolutionary heterogeneous system architecture (HSA) features and is expected to begin shipping to customers in the second half of 2013.

Hes joking right ??

Richland 40% over Trinity and is currently shipping to OEMs ?? and then Kaveri will be on 28nm and expected to begin shipping in the second half of 2013 ???? they will release both of them in the same year ?? WTF
 

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
5,312
7,954
136
Hes joking right ??

Richland 40% over Trinity and is currently shipping to OEMs ?? and then Kaveri will be on 28nm and expected to begin shipping in the second half of 2013 ???? they will release both of them in the same year ?? WTF

I don't see where the info is coming from. The website is written as if AMD already had their press conference releasing all this info, but it doesn't start for another 2 hours and change. It seems like it is someone writing an article on what they think AMD will announce rather than on any valid (i.e. pr approved) information. I guess we'll find out soon.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Well I just watched the pod cast Silvermont will be out in the stores by holidays of 2013 . From the horses mouth. So that takes care of that made up story . Windows 8 is actually looking pretty good . I like the presentation . Haswell also is no longer 10 watt . Its been moved to 7 watts . I figured 8watts based on last years demo . Intel managed 1 extra watt. So there you have in the tablet space intel will dominate the high end all others are cream puffs . Silvermont will likely also beat the others giving us to GREAT intel choices. Core size means nothing other than more dies per 300m on smaller dies since intel has its own fabs its not hurting intel so much as those who have to pay foundries for dies. Samsung being intels fab nemesis
 
Last edited:

SiliconWars

Platinum Member
Dec 29, 2012
2,346
0
0
Well I just watched the pod cast Silvermont will be out in the stores by holidays of 2013 . From the horses mouth. So that takes care of that made up story . Windows 8 is actually looking pretty good . I like the presentation . Haswell also is no longer 10 watt . Its been moved to 7 watts . I figured 8watts based on last years demo . Intel managed 1 extra watt. So there you have in the tablet space intel will dominate the high end all others are cream puffs . Silvermont will likely also beat the others giving us to GREAT intel choices

That's :thumbsup: GREAT NEWS :thumbsup: now why don't you go make a thread about it so the people who give a shit can post in it?
 

inf64

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2011
3,702
4,027
136
Name of the thread: Richland and Kabini rumors. Atom is not Richland and Atom is not Kabini. Thank you.
 

MightyMalus

Senior member
Jan 3, 2013
292
0
0
Well I just watched the pod cast Silvermont will be out in the stores by holidays of 2013 . From the horses mouth. So that takes care of that made up story . Windows 8 is actually looking pretty good . I like the presentation . Haswell also is no longer 10 watt . Its been moved to 7 watts . I figured 8watts based on last years demo . Intel managed 1 extra watt. So there you have in the tablet space intel will dominate the high end all others are cream puffs . Silvermont will likely also beat the others giving us to GREAT intel choices. Core size means nothing other than more dies per 300m on smaller dies since intel has its own fabs its not hurting intel so much as those who have to pay foundries for dies. Samsung being intels fab nemesis

Offtopic response: Haswell no longer being 10w means its a weaker Haswell. Core sizes means ALOT! Less room for batteries! omg...and other equipment! Sheesh. Atom actually looks better than Haswell in that market! This guy eats Intel marketing like its nothing.

On topic, why is the APU's so sensitive to RAM? More so than Intel's iGPU. And do you guys see this "trend" improving even more?

I just saw some G.skill RAM OC'ed to 3900MHz, and made me wonder.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Hes joking right ??

Richland 40% over Trinity and is currently shipping to OEMs ?? and then Kaveri will be on 28nm and expected to begin shipping in the second half of 2013 ???? they will release both of them in the same year ?? WTF

Actually go read the whole thing it say up to 40% depending on what ever.
 

NTMBK

Lifer
Nov 14, 2011
10,239
5,024
136
On topic, why is the APU's so sensitive to RAM? More so than Intel's iGPU. And do you guys see this "trend" improving even more?

I just saw some G.skill RAM OC'ed to 3900MHz, and made me wonder.

Because the actual graphics execution units are more numerous and powerful than their Intel counterpart. If the graphics can do more work per second, then it needs faster access to memory in order to a) get more work to do and b) return its results. It's why you'll still see DDR3 memory on low-end discrete GPUs, but GDDR5 exclusively on anything faster.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.