So what you are saying is to make friends with a 5th dimensional creature and convince it to uber me?And a perpetual-motion machine.
I gather there are some theoretical possibilities for FTL travel (or a warp drive), but they have minor technical drawbacks like requiring more energy than exists in the universe, little things like that. Edit - ah, that's more-or-less what @Vic said.
AkshullySome things are genuinely impossible. Such as FTL/warp drive, time travel, teleportation, and electrons overcoming their self-repulsive effect at STP.
The bad news is, from the original paper, this looks optimistic. They were talking about ~.01 amp.Scenario 1: Low-field, low-current ~$1.5 trn: LK-99 saturates at relatively low fields, like 0.3T, and relatively low current densities, of ~1 amp / mm^2. It works in delicate electronics, small packages, at high efficiencies, with extremely high sensitivity.
That also seems ripe for refinement, and all the marbles to whoever can mass produce a refined productThe bad news is, from the original paper, this looks optimistic. They were talking about ~.01 amp.
Then again, there are suggestions LK-99 crystals are a superconductor along only one axis. So all the samples so far, which are random mixtures of many crystals, many of which may be the wrong composition, may be very sub-par. It's like asking how many amps/mm^2 does this "solid wire" carry?
![]()
The fact that it's even achievable means it can eventually scaled to an engineering level. That just takes time.The bad news is, from the original paper, this looks optimistic. They were talking about ~.01 amp.
Then again, there are suggestions LK-99 crystals are a superconductor along only one axis. So all the samples so far, which are random mixtures of many crystals, many of which may be the wrong composition, may be very sub-par. It's like asking how many amps/mm^2 does this "solid wire" carry?
![]()
Not many facts going around right now. One is that a Chinese team has confirmed LK-99 is a superconductor...at 110 Kelvin. (That's -163C.)The fact that it's even achievable means it can eventually scaled to an engineering level.
Is this really a new class? It includes copper oxide after all. 🤔a new class of superconductive materials - I believe the last class that was discovered was back in 1986 and the classes we know have been explored extensively, so no great advances are expected with these older superconducting materials
I'm just a layman, but I believe it is a new class if I have understood the discussions of others around classes of superconductors and LK-99. I could be wrong. I have followed the news of LK99 across multiple threads over on Hacker News. Multiple folk there have claimed that this would be a new class of high temp superconductor (if other experiments pans out ofcause). Some examples of quotes;Is this really a new class? It includes copper oxide after all. 🤔
SourceAs someone who has worked on superconductivity I'd say that all of these are all potentially HUGE, but meaningless individually because they require experimental replication. They point to at minimum a new class of high temperature superconductors at least as good as current industrial ones. To know if it's truly transformative or not though we'll need multiple confirmations from big name labs. That's going to take time, so this trickle is exciting but won't mean much until the dust settles.
SourceThere’s some emerging evidence that it may be a new class of “1-d” superconducting material that only superconducts in certain places/directions. Will turn into big academic fight to redefine superconductivity if so, I think.
What the f...Wired has a good writeup of why we should remain skeptical even as qualified engineers are rushing to replicate the LK-99 material and validate superconductivity experiments.
![]()
Inside the DIY Race to Replicate LK-99
Experts doubt claims that LK-99 is a room-temperature superconductor set to open up a future of levitating trains and quantum tech. Andrew McCalip wants to see for himself.www.wired.com
Edit: Apparently the global market for copper phosphide and precursor red phosphorus (already a controlled substance) has exploded, and supplies have disappeared overnight.
Is this even in the best interests of the world wide defense industries? Could lead to a massive global recession.perhaps we can have peace?
Sorry, in my view, unlimited free energy (1) almost already exists, and (2) will almost certainly not bring peace.I've been disappointed so many times, dont want to get my hopes up... but fusion baby. Fusion.
If we survive the disruption of plentiful free energy anywhere, for everyone, perhaps we can have peace?
Yeah thanks for pouring some cold water on that, I’m not sure how people are so delusional. Same thing with AI is going to make it so that none of us have to work, uh huh. It’s basically just going to accelerate the concentration of wealth gap disparity that’s been accelerating for so long already. Short of government intervention, all some breakthrough energy technology is going to do is make better profit margins for the power companies since they’ve already shown the market can bear current prices.Sorry, in my view, unlimited free energy (1) almost already exists, and (2) will almost certainly not bring peace.
The developed world has already figured out how to provide plentiful energy (and water) to its citizens, that is nearly free from a high level economic perspective (e.g. in US, 2.5% of CPI is electricity, and of that, even if wholesale electricity was given away for free - which it sometimes is - would still have nearly half that cost just to continue maintaining transmission infrastructure).
So completely "free" energy generation would directly save the average US citizen about 1.5% of their budget, offsetting a few months of inflation. (And over time, if you completely electrified the vehicle fleet, with the commodity electricity price set at 0 before transmission/distribution, saves everyone another 2% or so off of their budget).
And in practice, actual savings would be far less than the ~3.5% total above, as you'd still have capital costs for building the fusion reactors - likely resulting in negligible savings vs. what industrial scale solar/wind are already providing today on the margin. Although a good baseload option to displace coal is very helpful environmentally.
And wars were just as bad before there was any oil or energy to fight over, it just added another major economic sub-factor to the driving imperialism, nationalism, and religious factors which (unfortunately) haven't gone away.
My line of reasoning goes something like thisSorry, in my view, unlimited free energy (1) almost already exists, and (2) will almost certainly not bring peace.
The developed world has already figured out how to provide plentiful energy (and water) to its citizens, that is nearly free from a high level economic perspective (e.g. in US, 2.5% of CPI is electricity, and of that, even if wholesale electricity was given away for free - which it sometimes is - would still have nearly half that cost just to continue maintaining transmission infrastructure).
So completely "free" energy generation would directly save the average US citizen about 1.5% of their budget, offsetting a few months of inflation. (And over time, if you completely electrified the vehicle fleet, with the commodity electricity price set at 0 before transmission/distribution, saves everyone another 2% or so off of their budget).
And in practice, actual savings would be far less than the ~3.5% total above, as you'd still have capital costs for building the fusion reactors - likely resulting in negligible savings vs. what industrial scale solar/wind are already providing today on the margin. Although a good baseload option to displace coal is very helpful environmentally.
And wars were just as bad before there was any oil or energy to fight over, it just added another major economic sub-factor to the driving imperialism, nationalism, and religious factors which (unfortunately) haven't gone away.
My line of reasoning goes something like this
Food security.
OPEC loses relevance.
A lot of other stuff that means we dont need wars over resources. Africa has oil? Good for Africa. We’d have a chance at stunting coming climate mass migration. Do a real dent in regards to climate mitigation.
Yes I see a lot of avoidable conflict.
That looks like a superconductor. It spins freely without aligning any particular way.This video is convincing:
That pellet was made by crushing up a lot of material and sorting out the grains that floated and then pressing them together. It’s polycrystalline and likely isn’t superconducting across any macroscopic dimension of the pellet at room temp… But enough of those disjointed grains are oriented in the proper direction for the thing to expel magnetic field like a bulk superconductor.