Researchers claim to achieve room temperature/ambient pressure superconductivity

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

RnR_au

Platinum Member
Jun 6, 2021
2,505
5,890
136
The South Koreans are doing a presentation in March;

March 24, 2024, 8.12am - 8.14am -> American Physical Society meeting, Minneapolis, Minnesota -> HyunTak Kim, eminent physics professor from the College of William and Mary, is scheduled to present on superconductivity. Notably, the abstract reveals:
> JH Kim, the heroic experimental chemist (the K, in LK-99), is no longer part of the team, leaving Lee as the principal author from Quantum Energy Korea
> The compound from Aug has been characterized further, no longer a mere lead apatite, but now PCPOSOS, with substitutions of Sulphur for Oxygen in some positions
> They don’t even claim the LK-99 name anymore (because that would, uh.. refer to a different compound)
> However, the team has confirmed Type-II superconductivity at room temperature and pressure, confirmed the Meissner effect, explained the partial levitation seen (it’s because the critical magnetic field that knocks out the superconductive effect is close enough that normal variation in magnetic field strength trigger the threshold)
From https://nitter.net/8teAPi/status/1742393292741120074
So like the Chinese above also using Sulfur.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

RnR_au

Platinum Member
Jun 6, 2021
2,505
5,890
136
I didn't see anything there extremely convincing.
The Chinese are playing it careful. From the twitter/nitter thread above;
For the uninitiated, having been so terribly burned by LK-99, no one wants to mention superconductivity again until they are absolutely sure.

I guess the fact that the South Koreans mention superconductivity in their session abstract means that they are still bullish :D

Link to the March session;
 

RnR_au

Platinum Member
Jun 6, 2021
2,505
5,890
136
An update;
A researcher behind the new potential room-temperature superconductor just gave a new interview.

Highlights:
• They have only synthesized " a few hundred nanometers" of the new material so far
• They recognize the limitations of their data to draw a final conclusion — and they are continuing to be careful, just calling it data that POTENTIALLY indicates superconductivity
• They believed they have fully ruled out ferromagnetism as a potential explanation of their results
• The next step is to get up to "micrometer scale or larger" in their synthesis to give them more to test• After they do, they will continue testing with the other, more normal tests of superconductivity: "Common ways to verify superconductivity include 4-probe DC resistance measurement, vibrating sample magnetometer for Meissner effect, specific heat jumps, Josephson effect, scanning tunneling microscopy, [and] photoemission spectroscopy."

Upside down full levitation in a magnetic field;
1704342905005.png

Source
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
25,506
15,028
136
Yea we’re all recovering burn victims here… But march is a long ways off surely we’ll see it reproduced elsewhere before that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RnR_au

RnR_au

Platinum Member
Jun 6, 2021
2,505
5,890
136
A bit of a summary of the recent news. Love the editor note :D

Editor’s note: The science communication role means you are one part technical translator and one part perpetual jilted lover. Science is a harsh taskmaster and, more often than not, “breakthroughs” can barely break through the door of replication efforts, or are doomed to never scale outside of the lab. Last year, a team of Korean scientists reported that they achieved room-temperature superconductor using a modified lead-apatite — LK-99 — structure. Replication efforts did not go so well. Now, it seems a team of Chinese scientists, from respected institutions, have reported success with a modified LK-99 investigation. At the risk of being stood up at the altar of the scientific method yet again, and understanding the duty to inform the community, here is a cautious summary of the paper guided by some social media commentary — along with an earnest hope for peer review and an entreaty to not shoot the messenger even as I hear a round slide into the chamber:

 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
25,566
11,944
136
A bit of a summary of the recent news. Love the editor note :D


You should follow the CF world this is barely controversial. Looks like Nature is finally going publish something soon even after several comments from readers who live in the old physics world complained. Since when are reader comments peers in the science.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RnR_au

RnR_au

Platinum Member
Jun 6, 2021
2,505
5,890
136
A bit of news on what is going on behind the scene of the South Koreans. Seems patents and paper reviews are gumming up the release of further data and samples.

Also interesting is the news that IBM may be working with them.

 
  • Love
Reactions: cytg111

RnR_au

Platinum Member
Jun 6, 2021
2,505
5,890
136
A couple of tidbits;

Asked what her gut feeling is about whether the superconductivity claims will pan out, Griffin responds: “I almost sound like a crazy person when I answer this, but I think it is a superconductor. I just say that it’s very, very hard to synthesize
...
The Chinese work placing sulfur in the wrong places ensures that copper (Cu) get substituted in the right place when a substitution occurs.

 

uclaLabrat

Diamond Member
Aug 2, 2007
5,631
3,040
136
You should follow the CF world this is barely controversial. Looks like Nature is finally going publish something soon even after several comments from readers who live in the old physics world complained. Since when are reader comments peers in the science.

If the comments are rational and valid based on the study design, the format/commenter matters not a whit.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
25,566
11,944
136
MARCH?

Superconductor today, Fusion tomorrow. Move move move move move damnit….
Lev trains would be a much better use and could happen tomorrow. Capturing extremely hot plasmas in a magnetic doughnut, not so much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cytg111

RnR_au

Platinum Member
Jun 6, 2021
2,505
5,890
136

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,255
136
I think even if this specific material is impossible to scale, I think proving it's possible will flood the field with money. Kind of like what happened with the transistor, the original ones were made of germanium and gold foil, they would've never scaled. But their invention pushed people to relook at silicon and developed successful silicone transistors.