Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: gsaldivar
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
I find it funny that the Repugs are having such a hard time dealing with Gov. Dean's statements.
The Repugs having been calling Dems names for the last twenty years. They can dish it out, but they can't take it. Buncha pusses.
I find it funny that Dems are hitching their wagon to Dean and his pointless race/class rhetoric. People are just sick and tired of hearing you guys beating the same old drum.
A growing number of blacks just feel that the Republican party better fits their values. The same old Dem "southern strategy" just isn't working anymore...
Ah well... If you didn't see the writing on the wall in 2004, I'm sure 2008 will be a shocker. :thumbsup:😀
See my sig. 2nd line.
So what happens when you lose with lies?
Frankly, I don't see how it's a lie. And deep down, neither do you.
Look at the Bush administration and tell me deep down inside Dean saying the republican party is the party of old whitey bears any resemblence too the truth.
Especially considering Clintons track record, or carters, or LBJs.
Sorry, but I don't see color, but I still see you do. I judge on the content of their character and not shield their actions with the color of their skin.
Hahahahah hohohoho what is this thread about again?
Talk about back peddling!
I'm sorry, but that's not backpeddling. It's like me saying "there's a lot of Muslims in Iraq". It's a quantifiable fact.
Um yeah you are, if you dont think race is a big issue then why agree with dean?
It's an observation of the quantifiable numbers in the GOP and its attitudes toward minorities. Sorry if you think that's backpeddling.
Hold on let me get this straight.
We are talking numbers of people who are minorities in a given party but when I point out the actual numbers I am shielding myself using their skin color and I am a rascist?
That sounds like broken logic to me.
Yes, you have more minorities in your cabinet than Clinton did. That's a quantifiable fact. Now how you use appointees'/nominees' race(s) to shield them and/or the administration/party from criticism makes you racist.
You mean pointing out the fact they are a minority? How would you suggest I refute Deans claims then without being a rascist according to your broken logic?