SSSnail
Lifer
- Nov 29, 2006
- 17,458
- 83
- 86
Well sounds like you know everything. Can you call the ATF and FBI and let them know.
Thanks proud internet warrior :whiste:
Really? Three people in body armor targeted a collection of leaders of an organization at a meeting. What do you call that? I mean, it doesn't take 2 brain cells to know that this is targeted and planned. Unless, you're one of those internet idiot that reacts on knee jerk emotions.
Methinks your idiocy extends beyond the digital realm.
You see, I'm one of the few moderates left in this country, and my solution is simple, makes sense, and satisfy both sides.Just like Obama, I'm going to go on and on and on about it until the dummies in society finally grasp the concept that a gun free for all is not the answer. The founding fathers didn't have this in mind. In their time it was cumbersome muskets that fired one shot a minute, not assault rifles and portable pistols.
You want your guns? Sure, you can have your guns. You want control? Sure you can have control. It's simple.
Implement a certification program, where the would be owner will have to go through a gun safety and handling course, get certified, THEN you can buy your gun. Along with the certification, the potential owner will also have to be cleared of any psychological conditions that would make owning the gun inherently dangerous to others. The certifications are not transferable, just like when you go buy a car, the drivers license is not transferable. The next owner will need to get certified as well before he or she can legally take possession of the gun.
This will also create jobs that are related to this whole certification business, better for the economy. See? I should be President.
Last edited: