Reports of an active shooter in San Bernadino

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SSSnail

Lifer
Nov 29, 2006
17,458
83
86
Well sounds like you know everything. Can you call the ATF and FBI and let them know.

Thanks proud internet warrior :whiste:

Really? Three people in body armor targeted a collection of leaders of an organization at a meeting. What do you call that? I mean, it doesn't take 2 brain cells to know that this is targeted and planned. Unless, you're one of those internet idiot that reacts on knee jerk emotions.

Methinks your idiocy extends beyond the digital realm.
Just like Obama, I'm going to go on and on and on about it until the dummies in society finally grasp the concept that a gun free for all is not the answer. The founding fathers didn't have this in mind. In their time it was cumbersome muskets that fired one shot a minute, not assault rifles and portable pistols.
You see, I'm one of the few moderates left in this country, and my solution is simple, makes sense, and satisfy both sides.

You want your guns? Sure, you can have your guns. You want control? Sure you can have control. It's simple.

Implement a certification program, where the would be owner will have to go through a gun safety and handling course, get certified, THEN you can buy your gun. Along with the certification, the potential owner will also have to be cleared of any psychological conditions that would make owning the gun inherently dangerous to others. The certifications are not transferable, just like when you go buy a car, the drivers license is not transferable. The next owner will need to get certified as well before he or she can legally take possession of the gun.

This will also create jobs that are related to this whole certification business, better for the economy. See? I should be President.
 
Last edited:

madoka

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2004
4,344
712
121
Looking like domestic terrorism.

STFU you liberal gun control assholes!

Every time it is determined to be the religion of peace behind it, libtards magically shut up about gun control and switch narratives/positions to defending Muslims from unfair biases.

I suppose their hero Oblama will label this another instance of workplace violence like Fort Hood.
 

madoka

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2004
4,344
712
121
MSNBC is citing that the perps not only had assault weapons, but also "assault clothing." How long before libtards call for a ban on such murderous clothing?
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
Looking like domestic terrorism.

STFU you liberal gun control assholes!

I take it back that you were starting to develop a sense of humor. Was clearly a miscalculation on my part in one post the other day.

ceBcLNG.gif


Not sure what "Leaders" they would have been targeting there, if it is Daesh related would be a pretty huge fail, just looks like 3 idiots to me.

Unfortunately, idiots kill people on a daily basis all over.
 
Last edited:

DCal430

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2011
6,020
9
81
Looks like Syed was once an employee of the SB Health Department, and it was their party that was shot up. But he hasn't worked there in over a year.
 

highland145

Lifer
Oct 12, 2009
43,973
6,337
136

DCal430

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2011
6,020
9
81
But seriously people they had guns that can shoot close to 1000 bullets a minute. Why is such a gun needed.
 

madoka

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2004
4,344
712
121
Let the libtard backtracking begin:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...ssacre-identified-article-1.2453471?cid=bitly

One of the suspects in Wednesday’s mass shooting in San Bernardino, Calif. has been identified as Syed Farook, according to reports.

Farook was linked to the horrific slaughter that took place at the Inland Regional Center, according to NBC News.

After police announced that two suspects — a male and a female — were dead following a car chase and shoot out with police, a search began at a nearby Redlands apartment linked to the suspects.

A man who identified himself as Farook’s father told the Daily News his son worked as a health technician inspecting restaurants and hotels.

“I haven’t heard anything. He worked in a county office,” Farook's dad told The News. “He’s married and has a kid. We’re estranged because my wife got the divorce, and they are together. She doesn’t want to see me.”

Farook said he hasn’t seen his son in some time.

“He was very religious. He would go to work, come back, go to pray, come back. He’s Muslim.”
 

luv2liv

Diamond Member
Dec 27, 2001
3,502
94
91
can we do something like what china and north korea are doing?
if you do something stupid, your whole immediate family pays the price. i bet people will be on their best behavior, in public anyway.
 

chetansha

Member
Sep 2, 2006
112
8
81
@luv2liv in china, korea , etc there are strong family(joint , extended) bonds which will deter crazies from doing shit, whereas in america families are mostly nuclear, hence it wont stop the crazies
 

JackBurton

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
15,993
14
81
I know, they're banned...

Yes, full automatic weapons are illegal in California. So we need to work on making illegal weapons more illegal. Reports that the suspects also had pipe bombs as well. Maybe we need to make those MORE illegal too.

Dumbass liberals.
 

highland145

Lifer
Oct 12, 2009
43,973
6,337
136
can we do something like what china and north korea are doing?
if you do something stupid, your whole immediate family pays the price. i bet people will be on their best behavior, in public anyway.
lol I bet that we would exterminate a large portion of the population After that,.....peace and tranquility.
 

preslove

Lifer
Sep 10, 2003
16,754
64
91
My favorite idiotic rationalization is that other countries don't have mass shootings because they're islands.

AMERICA is the source of most other countries' illegal guns, dumbfucks.

how exactly would the US be different if the NRA had never existed and how would that have prevented this?

Effective gun control would have passed without the NRA's expenditure of tens of millions of dollars each election cycle.

Why? Because the law says so?

When you actually use a gun against a person you also need a valid reason in order to conform to the law. Pretty sure these assholes didn't and don't care about the law.

They almost certainly purchased the guns legally, mr wingnut.
 

madoka

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2004
4,344
712
121
Effective gun control would have passed without the NRA's expenditure of tens of millions of dollars each election cycle.

Effective gun control?

So what magic law was passed to get criminals to obey the law?
 

TechBoyJK

Lifer
Oct 17, 2002
16,699
60
91
If it was workplace violence related, why were there 3 people? I find it hard to believe 3 disgruntled employees all decided to kill a bunch of people and do so in such fashion.
 

DCal430

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2011
6,020
9
81
Please tell me why a gun that fires 20 bullets a second should be in the hands of everyday people, it would take only a few minutes to kill thousands.