Release the Krak... err FISA Memo!

Page 37 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

snarfbot

Senior member
Jul 22, 2007
385
38
91
What is interesting is that Nunes and Trump decided to hold up Page as some kind of victim, when it’s common knowledge this guy had suspicious dealings with Russia for years. Could they have tried to pick a more sympathetic fellow?

The only intelligent thing to conclude from the memo is that for some reason, the GOP is going out of its way to defend a known Russian agent and attack the FBI for doing what it’s supposed to do. Innocent people usually don’t behave like this.

he had a minor relationship to the trump campaign, should the president just let him be destroyed in a desperate attempt to discredit his administration? if there is any evidence that he was a russian agent i think that would have been demonstrated by now, after years of spying.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,073
55,604
136
There's more, but it's behind a pay wall.

WSJ: Fusion’s Russia Fog
Let’s see. The Clinton campaign hires Fusion GPS, an opposition research firm, to investigate the Trump campaign. Fusion hires a former British spy, Christopher Steele, who produces a dossier based on Russian sources full of rumor, hearsay and an occasional fact to allege collusion between the Kremlin and Trump campaign.

Serious question, who the fuck would you expect to provide information on the internal actions of the Russian government other than Russians?

Absolutely baffling.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,549
33,097
136
That's not accurate. Been said over and over in here. The "dossier" was created by Steele who joined Fusion AFTER the DNC took over. Months after. Whether any info was gathered before may be up to debate but I haven't seen anything to suggest that's the case.
The data for the dossier was paid for by the Free Beacon. How many times do we need to go over that??

Dems took over payments, Steele was hired, the original data was used to create the dossier.
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,693
15,946
146
he had a minor relationship to the trump campaign, should the president just let him be destroyed in a desperate attempt to discredit his administration? if there is any evidence that he was a russian agent i think that would have been demonstrated by now, after years of spying.
Not if by spying on him the FBI was generating good intelligence on matters of national security. Say on collusion between Russians and politicians.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,954
10,298
136
Serious question, who the fuck would you expect to provide information on the internal actions of the Russian government other than Russians?

Absolutely baffling.

So in the allegation that Trump worked with Russia to win the election.... Clinton actually paid someone who worked with Russia to smear Trump.
 

snarfbot

Senior member
Jul 22, 2007
385
38
91
i think you are being willfully ignorant of the facts of this matter fskimospy, i dont think you want to have a reasoned argument.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,623
17,198
136

I see you've regressed into your former form and are now linking to opinion pieces by a writer with a strong Republican background and a history of writing false and misleading articles. This is another one of those articles and it relies on debunked information.

Congrats on being duped again. Sad and pathetic at the same time.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...run-by-ex-journalists/?utm_term=.8bcebaad6d9b
 
Last edited:

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,954
10,298
136
If Clinton is dirty, let's go after her too. Mueller certainly has the authority to follow this lead.

Clinton isn't the target, these posts are providing evidence of the corruption of the dossier to people here who want to vouch for its credibility.
 

jman19

Lifer
Nov 3, 2000
11,225
664
126
i think you are being willfully ignorant of the facts of this matter fskimospy, i dont think you want to have a reasoned argument.

Says the guy who has demonstrated a total lack of critical reading ability. You might want to take a look in the mirror.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,954
10,298
136
Where did you get the idea that the dossier is Russian propaganda?
There's more, but it's behind a pay wall.

WSJ: Fusion’s Russia Fog
Let’s see. The Clinton campaign hires Fusion GPS, an opposition research firm, to investigate the Trump campaign. Fusion hires a former British spy, Christopher Steele, who produces a dossier based on Russian sources full of rumor, hearsay and an occasional fact to allege collusion between the Kremlin and Trump campaign.
I see you've regressed into your former form and are now linking to opinion pieces by a writer with a string Republican background and a history of writing false and misleading articles. This is another one of those articles and it relies on debunked information.

Congrats on being duped again. Sad and pathetic at the same time.

And the Wall Street Journal?

By all means, if you want to vouch for the dossier, show us the people and news organizations that also vouch for it.
 

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,030
2,885
136
Clinton isn't the target, these posts are providing evidence of the corruption of the dossier to people here who want to vouch for its credibility.

I get it. They are trying to point the finger elsewhere. I'm saying they can have 2 fingers pointing different directions if they want. Doesn't matter to me. Go wherever the evidence leads. I seriously doubt Clinton will be implicated, though.
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,693
15,946
146
The data for the dossier was paid for by the Free Beacon. How many times do we need to go over that??

Dems took over payments, Steele was hired, the original data was used to create the dossier.

Here’s the argument.

  • The Free Beacon payed Fusion for opposition research on Trump
  • The Clinton campaign through a law firm took over paying for oppo research on Trump
  • After Clinton took over then Steele came on board and produced the dossier
So republicans started the investigation but technically the Steele dossier was funded by the Dems.
 
Jan 25, 2011
17,113
9,605
146
Here’s the argument.

  • The Free Beacon payed Fusion for opposition research on Trump
  • The Clinton campaign through a law firm took over paying for oppo research on Trump
  • After Clinton took over then Steele came on board and produced the dossier
So republicans started the investigation but technically the Steele dossier was funded by the Dems.
Yes I haven't seen anything that lays out when the data used was supposed to have been gathered. Given the supposed reliance on Steele's contacts I can't help but assume it was gathered after he joined the process.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,073
55,604
136
So in the allegation that Trump worked with Russia to win the election.... Clinton actually paid someone who worked with Russia to smear Trump.

This has to be a joke. You didn’t answer my question: who would you get intelligence from about what the Russian government was doing other than Russians? It’s just an insane allegation to make.

The Russian government was engaging in criminal activity to interfere with our election. If Trump was colluding with them on that it’s a big deal. Getting information about that is the opposite of a crime. How could you compare the two?
 
  • Like
Reactions: umbrella39

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
7,950
10,472
136
he had a minor relationship to the trump campaign, should the president just let him be destroyed in a desperate attempt to discredit his administration? if there is any evidence that he was a russian agent i think that would have been demonstrated by now, after years of spying.

If Carter Page wasn't producing useful intelligence after approval of the initial authorized wiretap, renewal applications would have been denied. Unless all those FISA judges didn't care about doing their jobs.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,549
33,097
136
The lawyers for Fusion GPS disagree with you
Lawyers for the conservative publication Washington Free Beacon informed the House Intelligence Committee Friday that the organization was the original funder for the anti-Trump opposition research project with Fusion GPS.

The Free Beacon funded the project from the fall of 2015 through the spring of 2016, whereupon it withdrew funding and the project was picked up by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/w...-anti-trump-opposition-effort/article/2638850

Now are you claiming their lawyers lied to a House Intel Committee???

Can we please end the bullshit that the Clintons/Dems paid for the dossier. Both sides paid.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,549
33,097
136
If Carter Page wasn't producing useful intelligence after approval of the initial authorized wiretap, renewal applications would have been denied. Unless all those FISA judges didn't care about doing their jobs.

The underlying secret intel would tell us that. You know the intel Nunes intentionally didn't review.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,549
33,097
136
This has to be a joke. You didn’t answer my question: who would you get intelligence from about what the Russian government was doing other than Russians? It’s just an insane allegation to make.

The Russian government was engaging in criminal activity to interfere with our election. If Trump was colluding with them on that it’s a big deal. Getting information about that is the opposite of a crime. How could you compare the two?
and Trump did collude with them. Trump was stupid enough to do it in public
 
  • Like
Reactions: umbrella39

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Man I really wish you Russian loving cocksuckers grandparents would have practiced safe sex. They are all doing cartwheels in their graves that their progeny have embraced an America hating treasonous coward. You guys are, again, on the wrong side of history. This is going to get very bad for you TrumpTards... We are not going to forget what you have done. Internment camps will be reserved for the worst of you...
 

snarfbot

Senior member
Jul 22, 2007
385
38
91