Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: conjur
Then our government's priorities are severely out of whack. Whatever happened to the "culture of life"? Oh wait, that's not for brown- or black-skinned people. That's just for the unborn or white women (esp. if they were blond and abducted).
I dont believe skincolor plays much of a roll, if any. After all, the people we are helping throughout the ME are not white. So therefore what's your point?
Yeah, by killing >30,000 of them and injuring who knows how many. This administration doesn't give two sh*ts about "liberating" the Iraqis. All it wants is access to Iraq's natural resources and be able to setup permanent military bases in Iraq to protect the oil and Israel. Nothing else.
Saddam was contained and Iran wasn't making threats about nuclear weapons until the US invaded its neighbors.
you're dreaming about both of those mistatements. You just weren't listening, and perhaps know nothing about Saddam and Iran's rolls in the terror campaigns throughout the ME. Both funded suicide bombings in Israel. You may also wish to read up on Iran's direct founding and running of the Hezbullah militia which was responsible for more terrorist acts around the world than I could count. Their current President was a fine upstanding member of that proud group of murderers.
I'm dreaming? HA! I'm not the one living in a chickenhawk fantasy world, Mr. Counterstrike. For one, Saddam was NOT financing suicide bombings. That's just more of your Freeper spin. The link is tenuous, at best. He paid the surviving family members $25,000. That's not financing suicide bombers. And, yes, I'm aware of Iran's involvement in terrorism. One could argue (and it has been done) that the US should have invaded/occupied Iran as it was definitely guilty of being linked to Al Qaeda and other terror groups and was actively working on WMD programs and possessed WMDs. None of that was true about Iraq. None of it.
And, yes, Saddam was contained. Or are you calling Gen. Zinni, Colin Powell, and Condi Rice liars?
Wouldn't stopping the massive loss of life in Africa and helping build those countries and establishing successful economies be more beneficial to the world than destabilizing the oil markets?
sadly, no, it wouldnt.
See, that's where you're wrong, yet again. Damn, I love that "compassionate conservatism"!
China has its own human rights problems and you want them to help out in human rights situations?

How about having the Middle East work on their problems while we sit back and advise a little but stay the fvck out, esp. militarily?
If we let them work it out themselves, then it will be worse than before we started. The ones with the guns are NOT the kind of people you want running their government. Can you imagine yet ANOTHER fundamental nation in ME holding hands with Iran as they nuke Israel off the map?! We cant let that happen, hence our continuing aid in the region in combatting insurgents. Our only hope in the region is to build democracies made up of non-fundamental persons (non-fanatics). If we cut and run anytime soon, then the insurgents will take over and make Saddam Hussein look like Mr. Rogers.
Uh, wtf do you think just happened in Iraq? Iran-lite was just voted into office on Dec. 15. Wake the fvck up! And, yes, they can take care of it themselves. Well, they could if the US and Britain would stay the hell out of their affairs. Western colonialism has only made matters worse in Iraq. It didn't work for the British in the early 1900s and it's not working for the US now.
Too bad this administration is sh*tting on its own interests (Americans) unless they're rich and donate to GOP candidates.
I'm not rich by any stretch, nor have I ever contributed to any party; and I don't feel "sh*t on" one bit. I am quite happy in fact, and believe that I owe alot to the government that has kept me safe, and provided me with all of the opportunities I have had, or will have.
Then you shoud consider yourself lucky. All of the economic indicators point to this "recovery" being heavily biased to corporations and the rich.
Troops dying in Africa? How? It's a humanitarian intervention for chrissakes! If some did die (from accidents or what not) it's at least a very commendable action: helping people. Not bombing the crap out of them.
so those who are massacring their own people would not take a page out of the insurgent books and plant bombs, etc? you're dreaming. Do you think we could just go in there and say "Please put down your guns and machetes so that we can all hold hands and sing Kumbaya?" HA! again, you're dreaming. Troops would most certainly die there as well.
With what? If they had the explosives that the insurgents/terrorists have in Iraq (thanks to the US leaving the al Qaaqa facility wide open to be looted) don't you think they'd be using them now on their own people? And, your BS right-wing rhetoric re: "Kumbaya" is summarily dismissed.
I don't think you really understand how things work. I believe that you believe that it really IS possible not to consider money into all of the decisions we need to make. Perhaps in some Utopian dream you've had, money does not play any role.
But in reality, money and econmic growth/stability are THE most important global variables to consider. Sad? yes. but true nonetheless.
Money = power = stability = security.
You see, that's where your Kool-Aid indoctrination comes into play. The imperialistic foreign policy of the US for the last 25 years hasn't work. The efforts to spread capitalism in order for US companies to dominate the globe and keep boosting their stock prices has come at a heavy cost. We are on a path to destruction if this keeps up. No way around it.