Atreus21
Lifer
Hopefully my state. Then Boeing won't move more jobs out of state.
Then again, my state is a bunch of hipster progressives wearing jeans so tight they can barely walk......nevermind. Not WA.
hee hee
Hopefully my state. Then Boeing won't move more jobs out of state.
Then again, my state is a bunch of hipster progressives wearing jeans so tight they can barely walk......nevermind. Not WA.
Just wanted to remind everyone that Walker won.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin_gubernatorial_recall_election,_2012#Results_3
Just wanted to remind everyone that Walker won.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin_gubernatorial_recall_election,_2012#Results_3
? Is there a news report as of 8/15/12 of someone or groups contesting it?
\if not, then what's the point of bumping the thread?
What does your sig say is magically delicious?
The bad guys lost, haven't you been keeping track? I even just posted about how the unions lost because Walker won.
You really are confused.
What does your sig say is magically delicious?
Schadenfreudei/ˈʃɑːdənfrɔɪdə/ (German: [ˈʃaːdənˌfʁɔʏdə]) is pleasure derived from the misfortunes of others.[
[/SIZE]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schadenfreude
He is the type of person who finds pleasure in the misfortunes of others.
The idea that anyone who meets the requirements to vote also meets the requirements to get a government ID is laughably false.Anyonehk
There you go. To vote, you need your voter ID. To get it, you need to prove you are actually you. It is easy to do, and anyone who meets the requirements to vote can do it.
I predict that you will now require me to interview every single person in the Philippines or else you will claim they are being disenfranchised.
It took you eight years to come up with that response?The idea that anyone who meets the requirements to vote also meets the requirements to get a government ID is laughably false.
Where did you get this nonsense from?
Seems pretty obvious to me that he was responding to a necrospammer, who's post is no longer in the thread, but you're not always one for seeing the obvious.It took you eight years to come up with that response?
Yup.Seems pretty obvious to me that he was responding to a necrospammer, who's post is no longer in the thread, but you're not always one for seeing the obvious.
greenie does more than not see the obvious, it seems he's actively ignoring the obvious.
The idea that anyone who meets the requirements to vote also meets the requirements to get a government ID is laughably false.
Where did you get this nonsense from?
Then how do we identify that voters are citizens?
When they register maybe? Like...isn't that the point of registration? To have the Voter Reg. validate said registration as being valid?
And have you ever wondered why in some states, the list of acceptable documentation to register to vote is quite long while denying almost all that documentation as acceptable when going to vote in person?
When they register maybe? Like...isn't that the point of registration? To have the Voter Reg. validate said registration as being valid?
And have you ever wondered why in some states, the list of acceptable documentation to register to vote is quite long while denying almost all that documentation as acceptable when going to vote in person?
Yes that is correct. When you go in and vote, you tell them your name and they cross it off the list and nobody else is eligible to vote with that name. If people were pretending to be someone else the way you and other conservatives imagine in your fevered dreams, you would end up with thousands of legitimate people going to vote and finding their names already crossed off. That happening a significant number of times in a single race would trigger an investigation every time and it would make national news, the way Republicans seem to make national news at least once per election year for other scummy activity lately.Right. Then they go to vote and...what? Saying their name is sufficient? We shouldn't authenticate any further?
Yes that is correct. When you go in and vote, you tell them your name and they cross it off the list and nobody else is eligible to vote with that name. If people were pretending to be someone else the way you and other conservatives imagine in your fevered dreams, you would end up with thousands of legitimate people going to vote and finding their names already crossed off. That happening a significant number of times in a single race would trigger an investigation every time and it would make national news, the way Republicans seem to make national news at least once per election year for other scummy activity lately.
Why are we wasting so much time and money solving a non-existent problem?So you'd take it in stride if I determined your name and had you vote for trump?
Why are we wasting so much time and money solving a non-existent problem?