Recall Republican Wisconsin Governor Walker status update thread

[Atreus21]

Hopefully my state. Then Boeing won't move more jobs out of state.

Then again, my state is a bunch of hipster progressives wearing jeans so tight they can barely walk......nevermind. Not WA.

hee hee

 

[cybrsage]

Just wanted to remind everyone that Walker won.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin_gubernatorial_recall_election,_2012#Results_3

 

[MrColin]

Just wanted to remind everyone that Walker won.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin_gubernatorial_recall_election,_2012#Results_3

He did, but it cost the bad guys around a billion dollars to keep him there. I've been trying to figure a way to calculate the payback period for that.

 

[cybrsage]

The bad guys lost, haven't you been keeping track? I even just posted about how the unions lost because Walker won.

You really are confused.

 

[UberNeuman]

Just wanted to remind everyone that Walker won.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin_gubernatorial_recall_election,_2012#Results_3

? Is there a news report as of 8/15/12 of someone or groups contesting it?

\if not, then what's the point of bumping the thread?

 

[Gigantopithecus]

? Is there a news report as of 8/15/12 of someone or groups contesting it?

\if not, then what's the point of bumping the thread?

What does your sig say is magically delicious?

 

[UberNeuman]

What does your sig say is magically delicious?

ah, yes... with a terrible gop field of Romney and Ryan, I'd guess something to prop up those (conservative) feelings is needed...

\a soothing balm.....

 

[*kjm]

The bad guys lost, haven't you been keeping track? I even just posted about how the unions lost because Walker won.

You really are confused.

You should have seen the letter from the union today about open forums and an online survey on what they should do to shape their future and what they should spend their * still don't get it* our*** money on. They should have done that years ago and their fall would not have been so hard

Walker wins
Ryan next VP
Tommy # 51

Good times I tell ya

 

[cybrsage]

What does your sig say is magically delicious?

Schadenfreude i/ˈʃɑːdənfrɔɪdə/ (German: [ˈʃaːdənˌfʁɔʏdə]) is pleasure derived from the misfortunes of others.[

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schadenfreude

He is the type of person who finds pleasure in the misfortunes of others.

 

[MrColin]

[/SIZE]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schadenfreude

He is the type of person who finds pleasure in the misfortunes of others.

There was a grand master troll on ATOT named schadenfreude, probably banned by now, I think that is what the sig refers to.

 

[fskimospy]

Anyonehk

There you go. To vote, you need your voter ID. To get it, you need to prove you are actually you. It is easy to do, and anyone who meets the requirements to vote can do it.

I predict that you will now require me to interview every single person in the Philippines or else you will claim they are being disenfranchised.

The idea that anyone who meets the requirements to vote also meets the requirements to get a government ID is laughably false.

Where did you get this nonsense from?

 

[UNCjigga]

Holy necromancy, Batman!

Has the recall campaign for Evers started yet? Seems like the natural next step for a governor stripped of any real tools to stave off a pandemic.

Half /s

 

[Greenman]

The idea that anyone who meets the requirements to vote also meets the requirements to get a government ID is laughably false.

Where did you get this nonsense from?

It took you eight years to come up with that response?

 

[Brainonska511]

It took you eight years to come up with that response?

Seems pretty obvious to me that he was responding to a necrospammer, who's post is no longer in the thread, but you're not always one for seeing the obvious.

 

[fskimospy]

Seems pretty obvious to me that he was responding to a necrospammer, who's post is no longer in the thread, but you're not always one for seeing the obvious.

Yup.

 

[dawp]

greenie does more than not see the obvious, it seems he's actively ignoring the obvious.

 

[ecogen]

greenie does more than not see the obvious, it seems he's actively ignoring the obvious.

Sad part is that he doesn't seem to be a troll.

 

[Atreus21]

The idea that anyone who meets the requirements to vote also meets the requirements to get a government ID is laughably false.

Where did you get this nonsense from?

Then how do we identify that voters are citizens?

 

[Meghan54]

Then how do we identify that voters are citizens?

When they register maybe? Like...isn't that the point of registration? To have the Voter Reg. validate said registration as being valid?

And have you ever wondered why in some states, the list of acceptable documentation to register to vote is quite long while denying almost all that documentation as acceptable when going to vote in person?

 

[UberNeuman]

When they register maybe? Like...isn't that the point of registration? To have the Voter Reg. validate said registration as being valid?

And have you ever wondered why in some states, the list of acceptable documentation to register to vote is quite long while denying almost all that documentation as acceptable when going to vote in person?

The only thing he's wondering is why is the boat filling with water when the Titanic is the best ship ever.

 

[Atreus21]

When they register maybe? Like...isn't that the point of registration? To have the Voter Reg. validate said registration as being valid?

And have you ever wondered why in some states, the list of acceptable documentation to register to vote is quite long while denying almost all that documentation as acceptable when going to vote in person?

Right. Then they go to vote and...what? Saying their name is sufficient? We shouldn't authenticate any further?

 

[dank69]

Right. Then they go to vote and...what? Saying their name is sufficient? We shouldn't authenticate any further?

Yes that is correct. When you go in and vote, you tell them your name and they cross it off the list and nobody else is eligible to vote with that name. If people were pretending to be someone else the way you and other conservatives imagine in your fevered dreams, you would end up with thousands of legitimate people going to vote and finding their names already crossed off. That happening a significant number of times in a single race would trigger an investigation every time and it would make national news, the way Republicans seem to make national news at least once per election year for other scummy activity lately.

 

[Atreus21]

Yes that is correct. When you go in and vote, you tell them your name and they cross it off the list and nobody else is eligible to vote with that name. If people were pretending to be someone else the way you and other conservatives imagine in your fevered dreams, you would end up with thousands of legitimate people going to vote and finding their names already crossed off. That happening a significant number of times in a single race would trigger an investigation every time and it would make national news, the way Republicans seem to make national news at least once per election year for other scummy activity lately.

So you'd take it in stride if I determined your name and had you vote for trump?

 

[Brainonska511]

So you'd take it in stride if I determined your name and had you vote for trump?

Why are we wasting so much time and money solving a non-existent problem?

 

[Atreus21]

Why are we wasting so much time and money solving a non-existent problem?

Good security means addressing vulnerabilities before they're exploited.

Would you be okay with it if I used your name to have you vote for Trump?