• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Recall Republican Wisconsin Governor Walker status update thread

Page 73 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
You called me dear again. I told you that once you had a piece of The Sage you would never be able to go back to your old lifestyle. 🙂
 
cybrsage said:
You called me dear again. I told you that once you had a piece of The Sage you would never be able to go back to your old lifestyle. 🙂
Click to expand...
Naturally you change the subject with your usual not-clever, not-funny, highly childish, smarmy innuendo to dodge responsibility for your dishonesty. Of course changing your behavior to honestly address Eskimospy's actual point is completely out of the question for you. You don't seem to know how.
 
Bowfinger said:
Naturally you change the subject with your usual not-clever, not-funny, highly childish, smarmy innuendo to dodge responsibility for your dishonesty. Of course changing your behavior to honestly address Eskimospy's actual point is completely out of the question for you. You don't seem to know how.
Click to expand...

There are many types of invalid signatures, only some of which are forgeries. It's best to ignore cybrsage, there is zero point in engaging someone who behaves like he does.
 
eskimospy said:
There are many types of invalid signatures, only some of which are forgeries.
Click to expand...
Right. This was even discussed a bit earlier in the thread, that many of the legally "invalid" signatures are due to very simple and legitimate issues. The partisan hacks can't acknowledge this, of course, since it undermines their programmed rage.


It's best to ignore cybrsage, there is zero point in engaging someone who behaves like he does.
Click to expand...
Yes and no. I absolutely agree it's pointless to attempt productive discussion with him. It's clear that's the last thing he wants. Aside from pure entertainment value, however, there's also the issue of allowing lies to remain unchallenged. A lie left unchallenged gains legitimacy with the ignorant. The more often the lie is repeated, the more those people believe it. It's the foundation of effective propaganda.
 
Last edited:
Bowfinger said:
Naturally you change the subject with your usual not-clever, not-funny, highly childish, smarmy innuendo to dodge responsibility for your dishonesty. Of course changing your behavior to honestly address Eskimospy's actual point is completely out of the question for you. You don't seem to know how.
Click to expand...

Oh man, I am sorry! I totally forgot I was supposed to pretend we did not enjoy a night of fun and passion. My bad. You just confused me by calling me dear like you did the other night.

Um...everyone, forget what I said before...


(but you did tell such sweet lies that night, I believed them because I wanted to, dear 🙂 )
 
Last edited:
eskimospy said:
There are many types of invalid signatures, only some of which are forgeries. It's best to ignore cybrsage, there is zero point in engaging someone who behaves like he does.
Click to expand...

How does this answer my question? I will restate it, since obviously some people (read that to be you) cannot understand short sentences.

Did they remove the forgeries yet?
 
cybrsage said:
Oh man, I am sorry! I totally forgot I was supposed to pretend we did not enjoy a night of fun and passion. My bad. You just confused me by calling me dear like you did the other night.

Um...everyone, forget what I said before...


(but you did tell such sweet lies that night, I believed them because I wanted to, dear 🙂 )
Click to expand...
You can't honestly expect anyone here to take you seriously when you regularly post such infantile noise, can you? It makes you look like a retarded ten year old, totally incapable of engaging in adult discussion on topics here. Whenever challenged to support or defend your partisan points, you consistently revert to duhversions and derailment. I'm not sure what you think you're accomplishing that way, but you serve only to discredit the right with such antics. Perhaps that's your true intent. Perhaps you are a parody poster, trying (successfully) to make Republicans look ridiculous.
 
Actually it looks like he's doing a wonderful job of driving those on left on this forum crazy. You guys spend hours replying to his every post.
 
Ausm said:
EagleKeeper said:
Ausm said:
That is correct with one caveat now he can't collect unlimited Koch bros finances for his recall election now.
Click to expand...
Where is the information on financial limitation? Did not see it in the Recall Instructions/procedure PDF.

Are the funds for all sides then limited to instate only?
Click to expand...
http://www.startribune.com/local/139375513.html

http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/10/scott-walker-recall-wisconsin-unlimited-money
Click to expand...

Thanks

This shows that Walker is limited to 10K per donor.

What about the opponent? Do they have the same limits?
 
cybrsage said:
How does this answer my question? I will restate it, since obviously some people (read that to be you) cannot understand short sentences.

Did they remove the forgeries yet?
Click to expand...
The Walker camp chose to not do challenges. they are letting the GAB do the filtering.

I am sure that when the GAB is finished; they will put out the numbers, if not a list.
 
Bowfinger said:
You can't honestly expect anyone here to take you seriously when you regularly post such infantile noise, can you?
Click to expand...

I am sorry you expeted you infantile post to be responded to in a serious manner. You need to reduce the expectations in what kind of responses your infintile posts garner.
 
Bowfinger said:
Right. This was even discussed a bit earlier in the thread, that many of the legally "invalid" signatures are due to very simple and legitimate issues. The partisan hacks can't acknowledge this, of course, since it undermines their programmed rage.


Yes and no. I absolutely agree it's pointless to attempt productive discussion with him. It's clear that's the last thing he wants. Aside from pure entertainment value, however, there's also the issue of allowing lies to remain unchallenged. A lie left unchallenged gains legitimacy with the ignorant. The more often the lie is repeated, the more those people believe it. It's the foundation of effective propaganda.
Click to expand...

No, there's really no point. I'm not sure if you have kids or are around them much, but when they engage in attention seeking behavior like that the best thing you can do is not give it to them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top