adroc_thurston
Diamond Member
- Jul 2, 2023
- 8,741
- 11,491
- 106
Apple doesn't need dGPUs anymore.Navi12 went to Apple laptops as well.
gonya say miracles and magic are real.MLID said AT0 is coming to desktop dGPUs.
Apple doesn't need dGPUs anymore.Navi12 went to Apple laptops as well.
gonya say miracles and magic are real.MLID said AT0 is coming to desktop dGPUs.
I guess we'll see soon.
There is none.I maintain there's a max price point AMD should realistically stick to when it comes to dGPUs.
There is none.
Client gfx guys are just not allowed to ship large client parts.
Lisa said so. Her word is law.And why do you think they are not allowed?
Lisa said so. Her word is law.
No, it's not a price issue at all. AMD loves high ASPs.So Lisa agrees with me then.
He had some doc with a potential consumer config that was cut down. Doesn’t necessarily mean they will launch it.Navi12 went to Apple laptops as well.
MLID said AT0 is coming to desktop dGPUs.
But if you already got AT0 chip with big customer to sell to, then extra costs of turning this into dGPU are very small indeed and any extra volume would amortise fixed costs of making that chip in the first place.I maintain there's a max price point AMD should realistically stick to when it comes to dGPUs.
ProViz products.
Proviz maybe.Not even some leftovers for a castrated die?
Or it's a strategy: create expensive "pro" leftover and price it to sky (aka Titan) + regular gaming cards for us mortals.Proviz maybe.
Gaming, no.
Navi12 went to Apple laptops as well.
MLID said AT0 is coming to desktop dGPUs.
He had some doc with a potential consumer config that was cut down. Doesn’t necessarily mean they will launch it.
Exynos is not on normal RDNA branch nor is the ISA public on LLVMis this GFX1310 ??
Wccftech thinks samsung exynos 2700 launching this year could have RDNA 5 GPU
the graphics processor might be called the Xclipse 970, and given that the Exynos 2600’s Xclipse 960 is based on a modified version of ARM’s RDNA 4 architecture, the newer GPU could be based on RDNA 5.
![]()
Exynos 2700 Specifications, Features, Architecture, Launch Details - Here’s All You Need To Know About Samsung’s Next 2nm Chipset
The next 2nm chipset from Samsung is expected to be the Exynos 2700, and here’s everything you need to know about the siliconwccftech.com
According to The Korea Economic Daily citing Kiwoom Securities, Samsung plans to start mass production of the Exynos 2700 in the second half of 2026. This chip will be manufactured using Samsung Foundry’s advanced second-generation 2nm Gate-All-Around (GAA) fabrication process, known as SF2P.Early production yields for the Exynos 2700 have reached approximately 50%, which is considered a strong performance for an initial output from a cutting-edge 2nm process. the chip will integrate the new Xclipse 970 GPU, developed through Samsung’s continued collaboration with AMD. Early engineering samples show this GPU’s clock speed and performance are still modest, but there is room for improvement before official launch.
Samsung’s Exynos 2700 Mass Production Set to Shake Up Flagship Chip Market, Challenging Snapdragon’s Dominance in 2026
Samsung is gearing up for a major shift in its mobile processor strategy with the upcoming Exynos 2700. According to The Korea Economic Daily citing Kiwoom Securities, Samsung plans to start mass production of the Exynos 2700 in the second half of 2026. This chip will be manufactured using...semiwiki.com
whatever AMD releases will sell
however it won't be value
if it performs more than a 5090 then price also would be more than a 5090
You should really stop presenting your speculations as facts...Nope.
You should really stop presenting your speculations as facts...
It's not a speculation.You should really stop presenting your speculations as facts...
An RTX 6000 Pro competitor at saner prices (e.g. around 5000€) would be niceProviz maybe.
Gaming, no.
That is exactly what they're gonna sell.An RTX 6000 Pro competitor at saner prices (e.g. around 5000€) would be nice
So they have the silicon developed, in manufacturing, but deliberately don't try to get additional revenue for it to help recoup the design cost.
MLID says a lot of things.
Additional revenue implies there's a market for $2k gaming Radeons which is just not true.So they have the silicon developed, in manufacturing, but deliberately don't try to get additional revenue for it to help recoup the design cost.
It's not the memory prices, it's the PPA that kills it.I mean, I could see it turning into an Arc B770 situation (where it likely would have happened but memory prices doomed it) in 2027
