Discussion RDNA 5 / UDNA (CDNA Next) speculation

Page 100 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Win2012R2

Golden Member
Dec 5, 2024
1,364
1,383
96
I maintain there's a max price point AMD should realistically stick to when it comes to dGPUs.
But if you already got AT0 chip with big customer to sell to, then extra costs of turning this into dGPU are very small indeed and any extra volume would amortise fixed costs of making that chip in the first place.
ProViz products.

Nvidia totally owns that segment and it's pretty small anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marees

Kepler_L2

Golden Member
Sep 6, 2020
1,101
4,771
136
is this GFX1310 ??

Wccftech thinks samsung exynos 2700 launching this year could have RDNA 5 GPU

the graphics processor might be called the Xclipse 970, and given that the Exynos 2600’s Xclipse 960 is based on a modified version of ARM’s RDNA 4 architecture, the newer GPU could be based on RDNA 5.


According to The Korea Economic Daily citing Kiwoom Securities, Samsung plans to start mass production of the Exynos 2700 in the second half of 2026. This chip will be manufactured using Samsung Foundry’s advanced second-generation 2nm Gate-All-Around (GAA) fabrication process, known as SF2P.
Early production yields for the Exynos 2700 have reached approximately 50%, which is considered a strong performance for an initial output from a cutting-edge 2nm process.
the chip will integrate the new Xclipse 970 GPU, developed through Samsung’s continued collaboration with AMD. Early engineering samples show this GPU’s clock speed and performance are still modest, but there is room for improvement before official launch.

Exynos is not on normal RDNA branch nor is the ISA public on LLVM
 

Jan Olšan

Senior member
Jan 12, 2017
632
1,275
136
So they have the silicon developed, in manufacturing, but deliberately don't try to get additional revenue for it to help recoup the design cost.
I mean, I could see it turning into an Arc B770 situation (where it likely would have happened but memory prices doomed it) in 2027. But it's not H2 2027 today.

About you knowing what will happen for sure 2 years ahead, I have my doubts.
 

adroc_thurston

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2023
8,751
11,499
106
So they have the silicon developed, in manufacturing, but deliberately don't try to get additional revenue for it to help recoup the design cost.
Additional revenue implies there's a market for $2k gaming Radeons which is just not true.
I mean, I could see it turning into an Arc B770 situation (where it likely would have happened but memory prices doomed it) in 2027
It's not the memory prices, it's the PPA that kills it.