That's a scenario I can see it actually being made. If a large customer expressed some interest in such a chip. Then we might get some hand me downs.AT0 might also be used for game streaming services. Maybe also for Xbox game streaming?
That's a scenario I can see it actually being made. If a large customer expressed some interest in such a chip. Then we might get some hand me downs.AT0 might also be used for game streaming services. Maybe also for Xbox game streaming?
I can think of 2 kinds of cloud hardwareAT0 might also be used for game streaming services. Maybe also for Xbox game streaming?
Pack 6x AT0 together with a 96C Zen 6 EPYC CPU and you get pretty dense and fast game streaming servers (12 instances with 6 CPU cores and a halved AT0 per server). If gaming does not fly or is underutilized, you can still reuse them for some cloud Compute/ML/AI services.
Nvidia's solution is very good because it has a pay as you go model. But it is region limitedWell, a large customer might be Microsoft
But afaik no game streaming service is really killing it. Stadia was cancelled. Nvidias solution is not too bad but I do not know how many people use it.
Depends how far along the process was when they got their first sales figures from 9070 XT, which were pretty promising.The chart MLID showed must be quite old at this point I presume? What are the odds that AMD decided to play it safe again and go for AT1 and AT3 aka the logical successors for Navi 48 and 44?
Sales have absolutely nothing to do with decisions on this level (halo parts will be moving 3.5 units in any case).Depends how far along the process was when they got their first sales figures from 9070 XT, which were pretty promising.
Given this If there was still enough time they might extend their ambitions for the RDNA5 generation.
Albeit the sheer length of time after RDNA3 combined with the low stock and less than stellar perceived improvement of RTX 5000 series may well have significantly colored those sales numbers.
Not quite so trivial as that.
Not unless they want to abandon the advantages consoles have typically had over the PC platform for a given spec.
By using a more limited hw spec game devs can optimise performance in pre compiled shaders and assets tailored to fit.
Even a mid cycle refresh is adding significantly more required effort to supporting each platform.
Abandoning the current regime would probably end up with even less devs wanting to go with MS without being bought into it.
MY view is that we may end up with multiple Xbox SKUs with AT3, 2 & 1. If AT3 is manufactured on N3C (does that have the same density as N3P? if so and the difference is slightly lower performance for a few thousand cheaper per wafer price kinda a no brainer) I can see a 1TB nVME $500 base Xbox Home console with 12GB of VRAM + 16 or so GB of LPDDR5X as the "entry level" box, AT2 with a 2TB nVME be the $800 Series X successor effectively and $1200+ AT1 with 4TB nVME acting as the stand in for a pro.If there is no strix halo laptop / tablet then there is no use case for a strix halo like medusa halo
AMD might as well replace the 192 bit 72 CU AT2 in magnus with a 128 bit 48 CU AT3 & call it a day 🤔🤔
Unless these consoles can play your PC library or have exclusives, they're DOA. And even if they could play PC games, it wont sell more than 30 million lifetime. I think Xbox is quiet quitting the console business, which is why they are using off-the shelf parts for the next one, to minimize the investment required and make porting easier.MY view is that we may end up with multiple Xbox SKUs with AT3, 2 & 1. If AT3 is manufactured on N3C (does that have the same density as N3P? if so and the difference is slightly lower performance for a few thousand cheaper per wafer price kinda a no brainer) I can see a 1TB nVME $500 base Xbox Home console with 12GB of VRAM + 16 or so GB of LPDDR5X as the "entry level" box, AT2 with a 2TB nVME be the $800 Series X successor effectively and $1200+ AT1 with 4TB nVME acting as the stand in for a pro.
PS5 is the best selling PlayStation this far into the cycle.Sony's mediocre sales
hahahahaha man you're funny.means Radeon needs to start being serious about dGPUs and laptops/OEMs
Wait wat?!PS5 is the best selling PlayStation this far into the cycle.
Yeah.Wait wat?!
Yesssss.Even with the COVID related supply chain issues and low spending during the lockdowns early on?
Ah right.They (PS4 vs PS5) are pretty close, according to Google:
Overall Sales (Worldwide)
"AI responses may include mistakes."
- As of May 2025 (55 months post-launch), the PS4 had sold 79.45 million units, while the PS5 had sold 76.31 million units. This means the PS4 is currently ahead of the PS5 in worldwide sales by 3.15 million units at that point in their respective lifecycles.
Recent Performance (June 2025)
- In June 2025, which marks the 57th month since the PS5's launch, the PS4's sales gap against the PS5 widened compared to the aligned launch period by 82,955 units globally.
- In the last 12 months (leading up to June 2025), the PS5 outsold the PS4 by 39,237 units globally.
I guess that is a point of perspective. As you said, the PS5 had to deal with many garbage factors in its lifetime, so it seems like its doing pretty well.Ah right.
Not quite so impressive then given increased population worldwide since the PS4.
It is possible to AMD get in pair with NVidia's Path Tracing performance on RDNA5?I think AT0 exists because RDNA 5 looks to be a very good architecture and Blackwell was just disappointing. I mean next-gen is the opportunity for AMD to really show off on the GPU side with Nvidia becoming complacent with Blackwell (even AI performance is lackluster which is why the top PCIe Pro card has bee pushed to 600W Vs 300W of before basically) and Rubin/RTX 60 doesn't seem more than a tweaked Blackwell architecturally on a smaller node.
They should be able to match rtx 50xx seriesIt is possible to AMD get in pair with NVidia's Path Tracing performance on RDNA5?
Nothing.What happens with 60xx series is another matter
I have doubts on the chiplet stuff. But if it is really a chiplet & given that release is planned for 2027 or later then it could easily be RDNA 6From AMD presentation 2023
![]()
red line at bottom. It's might be changed now.I have doubts on the chiplet stuff.
The bit I like most is: estimates IPC increase out of his arse and then - "but don't quote me!"MLID is so fake
From AMD presentation 2023
![]()
4 cores won't hack it, even Series S kept almost same CPU, total BS.This doesn't look like a PS6 handheld. For that they'd need at least CPU parity, which the 4 core can't achieve
It is more like a PS5 handheldThis isn't great, but the handheld looks quite a bit worse:
View attachment 128033
This doesn't look like a PS6 handheld. For that they'd need at least CPU parity, which the 4 core can't achieve.
And unless those Zen6c cores have a massive IPC increase over Zen5 and/or are clocking at 5GHz (doubtful for a handheld), it doesn't look like it can realistically emulate the PS5 CPU either.
Also, LPDDR5X in early 2028 doesn't sound super convincing.
If these specs come true, this looks more like a handheld with its own SDK that won't really play any PS6 titles and will only play the handful PS5 titles whose developers bothered to make a "low-TDP" version.
And if that's the case, the chances for Sony to release this and then just leave it to die after launch (like they did with PSVR2 and Vita) are pretty big.