brycejones
Lifer
Did you take a look in the mirror?
Oh come on you can do better than that......aren't you at least a bit brighter than incorruptible?
Did you take a look in the mirror?
The "legitimate" rape crowd strikes again. Although I am beginning to understand why some of our more "conservative" members are always so angry. They must be as repulsive in real life and can't get women to look at them twice let alone get laid. Well that and still living in mom's basement is probably a turn off to.
projecting?
actually in this case the left has no sense of gray.
chicks statement "I basically said, “No, I don’t want to have sex with you.”
Could mean she said "i'm tired not now"
Plus if she didn't want the guy around, why the fuck is she in bed with him?
Does the woman in question arguably having poor judgement preclude this from being rape?
Or in other words, how bad of a neighbourhood would I have to be in for a robbery to become consensual charity?
Bla Bla Bla.
This is a weak sauce case that we are only hearing one side of, and yet you fools on the left are ready to give this chicklet the benefit of the doubt. Why?
Just because a woman screams rape doesn't automatically make it true.
because women never lie about being raped.
I'm saying that in this case the chick is not making a good case for rape, unless you know
kind of no actually means no. and she thought they agreed to not sleep together
Your giving this accuser far more power then she deserves.
Cant you find a more clear cut case of 'rape' then this girl?
So you think in the case of rape there should be a gray zone?
Because I think it's better for everyone to err on the side of not raping someone.
You're whining that as an accuser of rape she has... too much power?
Seriously?
DON'T get into a position where whatever you're doing could be construed as rape. Don't be a fucking asshole.
The anecdotal nonsense about false accusations pales in comparison to the number of unreported assaults, so women are still on the short end of that power dynamic. And your complaints about that dynamic display all your insecurities. Nicely done, dipshit.
If there is no gray zone on what constitutes rape. Why is there any need to "err on the side of not raping someone"?
Seems like an admission of the truth. Liberals want to redefine being an asshole as being a rapist.
Consider the supposed campus epidemic of rape, a.k.a. “sexual assault.” Herewith, a Philadelphia magazine report about Swarthmore College, where in 2013 a student “was in her room with a guy with whom she’d been hooking up for three months”:
“They’d now decided — mutually, she thought — just to be friends. When he ended up falling asleep on her bed, she changed into pajamas and climbed in next to him. Soon, he was putting his arm around her and taking off her clothes. ‘I basically said, “No, I don’t want to have sex with you.” And then he said, “OK, that’s fine” and stopped. . . . And then he started again a few minutes later, taking off my panties, taking off his boxers. I just kind of laid there and didn’t do anything — I had already said no. I was just tired and wanted to go to bed. I let him finish. I pulled my panties back on and went to sleep.’”
Six weeks later, the woman reported that she had been raped.
"I Let him finish" implies consent.
Why did she wait six weeks?
You're whining that as an accuser of rape she has... too much power?
Seriously?
DON'T get into a position where whatever you're doing could be construed as rape. Don't be a fucking asshole.
The anecdotal nonsense about false accusations pales in comparison to the number of unreported assaults, so women are still on the short end of that power dynamic. And your complaints about that dynamic display all your insecurities. Nicely done, dipshit.
"I Let him finish" implies consent.
Why did she wait six weeks?
Not in the context of the rest of the scenario it doesn't.
What context makes that not sound like consent?
It fits right in with her putting jammies on and climbing into bed with him. It fits right in with her waiting 6 weeks to report it.
For a start there's the part where she told him she didn't sex. And then there's the other bit where she reported it as rape.
The best case scenario for a woman saying "I Let him finish" is that of a bored wife or girlfriend begrudgingly consenting to their partner's request, so why anyone is trying to make out that this particular case isn't rape is baffling.
What does any of this have to do with it?
The best case scenario for a woman saying "I Let him finish" is that of a bored wife or girlfriend begrudgingly consenting to their partner's request, so why anyone is trying to make out that this particular case isn't rape is baffling.
Oh I see, reporting it as rape is context but her waiting 6 weeks to report it has nothing to do with it. Appreciate your honesty.
The first bolded is basically why it by definition isn't rape. Being bored of the sex isn't rape.
Basically the story reads like someone who doesn't want to be annoyed by her partners nagging for sex so she consents. Nagging for sex isn't rape.
"I Let him finish" implies consent.
Why did she wait six weeks?
It only implies consent to those who didn't read the selective snippets contained within the opinion piece quoted in the OP. She distinctly told her ex-boyfriend she did not want sex.
No she didn't.
She "basically" told him no. And then she "kind of" just laid their and let him undress her. She is clearly using terms to fudge what happened. If you have to fudge the facts to try and make it look like rape; it isn't rape.