BaliBabyDoc
Lifer
- Jan 20, 2001
- 10,737
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: classy
Originally posted by: DaveSohmer
And lets put all this Thurmond or Lott champion of civil rights stuff to bed. Both for more than 40 years have voted AGAINST every major civil rights bill
Wrong! I posted links in the other thread that shows that is complete and utter bullsh!t. You really need to quit letting other people tell you how to think and start doing your own research.
Maybe you should take your own advice, genius.
MSNBC on Lott
Washington Post on Lott
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
A good summary of the only rationale link between history and what Lott said in 1980 and 2002
Granted if you believe Lott he wasn't talking about history. IMHO if someone from your party spends 5 decades in the Senate but doesn't have anything worth recognizing . . . your party doesn't stand for much (of worth).
Dave, I understand your perspective but where there's smoke there's fire or at least smoldering ashes. I'm not calling Lott a racist. But he cannot stand behind "fear of the feds" or "defense of the Constitution" as justification for all of his votes/actions. He is absolutely free to associate with whomever he wishes . . . but it is disingenous to back away from those associations on moral grounds but refuse to condemn them.
I have no qualm with voting against the MLK holiday. But I would dump a lot of holidays. McCain has legitimate credentials for opposing pork but Lott is pure swine when it comes to wasting our money. Let him explain his opposition to MLK . . . if he says anything about the expense he loses all credibility in my book.
In an interview with Southern Partisan magazine, Lott explained his stance on the King holiday: ?Look at the cost involved in the Martin Luther King holiday and the fact that we have not done it for a lot of other people that were more deserving.?
As far as his opposition to MLK it is clear that his position was money at least as far as the commision is concerned.
I share your pain but you give them too much attention. They don't read your links . . . hell some don't read their own, so why continue attempting an intelligent discourse with a shrub?My problem is with the shrill troglodytes who want to scream racist and bigot because they read in a headline they were supposed to.
But in his heart, Dave, Lott was opposed to the holiday. Unless he was lying to Southern Partisan. Do you think he was lying? I think he clearly expressed his views. Even if the holiday was a bargain he would recognize others before King. I want to hear him defend his position. I despise TV and have a particularly keen disdain for BET. Yet I cannot wait to see what he has to say
I share your pain but you give them too much attention. They don't read your links . . . hell some don't read their own, so why continue attempting an intelligent discourse with a shrub?
Optimism is good . . . delusions are bad. Idiots do not get smarter . . . when they start making sense you're getting dumber. Look I'm an optimist, too. My state traded in a racist farmer and Jesse Helms for John Edwards and Libby Dole. We've progressed from Neanderthals to lawyers. We're just an obelisk away from primates.I'm the eternal optimist I guess.
?Every time I hear something about trent lott, I think of Chris Rock
2 guys from 2 different backgrounds expressing their opinions with similar regaurd for others feelings
Originally posted by: DaveSohmer
Originally posted by: classy
Originally posted by: DaveSohmer
And lets put all this Thurmond or Lott champion of civil rights stuff to bed. Both for more than 40 years have voted AGAINST every major civil rights bill
Wrong! I posted links in the other thread that shows that is complete and utter bullsh!t. You really need to quit letting other people tell you how to think and start doing your own research.
Maybe you should take your own advice, genius.
MSNBC on Lott
Washington Post on Lott
Once again you have proven you are incapable of doing any of your own thinking. For your sake I hope MSNBC doesn't post an article saying the world is flat ot something.
Originally posted by: etech
Well since innocent until proven guilty has been thrown out the window by the left....
Classy and Bali, go get your rope and string Lott up to the nearest tree. That does seem to be what you are doing anyway.
Well since innocent until proven guilty has been thrown out the window by the left.... Classy and Bali, go get your rope and string Lott up to the nearest tree. That does seem to be what you are doing anyway.
Originally posted by: DaveSohmer
What would be enough proof for you Dave? Can you give an example? I admit, I'm making an inferance based on what has been going on in the paper/news and then was posted in a couple threads now. Too me his comment about Strom in and of itself was'nt that big of a deal until coupled with everything else which is now comming to light. We just have a different opinon on what consititues proof.
Can you prove that Lott's intentions are to hinder minorities? Did Lott vote to hinder minorities every chance that he had in the Congress? The answers to both of those questions are no so he get's the benefit of the doubt from me. I took your post in the other thread and checked it against the Congressional record and posted what I found and some links. You didn't even bother to respond and probably didn't even bother to look at what I linked. No big deal, I'm not trying to change anyones mind, I'm just trying to present all the facts and hope people will make judgements based on that and not just headlines or what some talking head tells them to think. I clearly stated my opinion about the Senator in the other thread so I won't repeat it here.
Originally posted by: classy
I am interracially married. ?
Originally posted by: DaveSohmer
And lets put all this Thurmond or Lott champion of civil rights stuff to bed. Both for more than 40 years have voted AGAINST every major civil rights bill
Wrong! I posted links in the other thread that shows that is complete and utter bullsh!t. You really need to quit letting other people tell you how to think and start doing your own research.
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Originally posted by: DaveSohmer
And lets put all this Thurmond or Lott champion of civil rights stuff to bed. Both for more than 40 years have voted AGAINST every major civil rights bill
Wrong! I posted links in the other thread that shows that is complete and utter bullsh!t. You really need to quit letting other people tell you how to think and start doing your own research.
What you posted in that other tread was your opinion of why it was perfectly OK for Lott to vote the way he did. I disagree, Civilrights, AA, MLK are all excellent legislation for blacks who were second class citizens till the late 60's if not even now. Only differnece is code words are used instead of the n-word.
Classy and Bali, go get your rope and string Lott up to the nearest tree.
did I say lynch him
