The fact that carbon, triple, classy and marty can't post a single thing to substantiate their claims is further proof that the Dems are nothing but a bunch of loud mouth ignorant whiners.
I am neither Dem nor Rep - I just call them as I see them. You know what I see right now? I see the same people who constantly whine about "personal responsibility" supporting Lott, who is refusing to take responsibility for what he said and is instead blaming it on the media for taking his words out of context.
You know what I call that? Pathetic.
Originally posted by: MartyTheManiak
Originally posted by: DaveSohmer
The fact that carbon, triple, classy and marty can't post a single thing to substantiate their claims is further proof that the Dems are nothing but a bunch of loud mouth ignorant whiners.
I am neither Dem nor Rep - I just call them as I see them. You know what I see right now? I see the same people who constantly whine about "personal responsibility" supporting Lott, who is refusing to take responsibility for what he said and is instead blaming it on the media for taking his words out of context.
You know what I call that? Pathetic.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
You're just white trash, Dave.![]()
Originally posted by: etech
Marty
I am neither Dem nor Rep - I just call them as I see them. You know what I see right now? I see the same people who constantly whine about "personal responsibility" supporting Lott, who is refusing to take responsibility for what he said and is instead blaming it on the media for taking his words out of context.
You know what I call that? Pathetic.
You overlook the one most obvious possibility. That what Lott said is all he ment it to say.
"At the news conference Friday in his Gulf Coast home town, Lott said he was "winging it" with those words, saying they were not meant to convey support for racial segregation, which he called "a stain on our nation's soul." Rather, he said, they marked an effort to help "an elderly gentleman to feel good. There were no venal thoughts in my mind." "
But all of his opponents on this one quote are mind readers and know exactly what he ment even though his actual words do not support them.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A55724-2002Dec14.htmlSenate sources said allies of Lott have tried to stave off such a challenge (senate leadership) by sending the message to colleagues that he would leave the Senate if he lost. McConnell warned in a conference call Friday night that Mississippi Gov. Ronnie Musgrove (D) would appoint Lott's successor, presumably a Democrat. That would put the Senate in an even split, 50 seats for each party.
Think about it this way. The two statements contradict each other, so one of them is a lie. His controversial comments were said on Monday and mirror ones he said in 1980. The what he said on friday came after his job was threatened. Futhermore, I think you'll agree that there are 1000s of other ways to help an elderly gentleman to feel good, other than saying america would be better off with segratation.
Originally posted by: etech
Think about it this way. The two statements contradict each other, so one of them is a lie. His controversial comments were said on Monday and mirror ones he said in 1980. The what he said on friday came after his job was threatened. Futhermore, I think you'll agree that there are 1000s of other ways to help an elderly gentleman to feel good, other than saying america would be better off with segratation.
Well, there you go again.
Where in the first statement did Lott say anything in praise of segregation? He didn't. He said that an old man would have made a fine president. True, no. Did Lott even believe it? Who knows It is quite common at a retirement part to praise the guy that is retiring. Running for President was probably one of the highlights of Strom's career. Lott made a comment about it. Anything else is just supposition on your part.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
KK, what happened to the third K? I just can't figure out why you white scum can't see racism when it hits you in the face.![]()
Why do so many people including yourself want to control what others say? When the democrats held a political rally in the form of a memorial service for Welstone it was clear that event was grossly improper but I didn't see any republican cry fowl and demand the democrats apologize for the activity.There was no need for Lott to say any of this and you guys will go to any length to absolve him of any responsibility.
Why don't you white males put a cork in it and listen to the minorities for a change. You don't know Jack about racism, you been dishing it out all your lives and never notice.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I think etech is right on: there is an obvious, discriminatory double standard at work here and it smells rotten.
----------------------
Damn Jelly, you too. Obvious why your name isn't Jelly Roll.
KKK, you name may be Jackass, but you are not my monkey.
Why don't you white males put a cork in it and listen to the minorities for a change. You don't know Jack about racism, you been dishing it out all your lives and never notice. Lott's a bigot who might escape because his state has a Democratic governor and he can use, can you dig it, BLACK MAIL, to avoid being pitched out on his white racist ass, probably giving KKK there a concussion in the process. You're all a bunch of damn PC cowards afraid of calling a SPADE a SPADE.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Please don't cry, Dave. I?m an extremely sensitive person and I would feel terrible. I'll confess, if you don't cry. You guys were claiming there's no racism in Lott's comment and I thought to my self, what's with that, are these guys color blind, can't they see racism when it's obvious. How ridiculous is that? So I decided to see. I started calling everybody in sight every RACIAL EPETHET I could think of and not one person called me a racist. So yea, you guys just might be blind enough not to see what Lott is.
The veterans of the Moonbeam wars are cagey, but not cagey enough.
