PJABBER
Diamond Member
- Feb 8, 2001
- 4,822
- 0
- 0
$50 that Rand Paul wins the senate race. You are on. Paypal good for you?
Be sure to make a donation to the campaign! Every little bit counts!
Rand Paul For U.S. Senate 2010
:thumbsup:
$50 that Rand Paul wins the senate race. You are on. Paypal good for you?
$50 that Rand Paul wins the senate race. You are on. Paypal good for you?
Done.
$50 that Rand Paul wins the senate race. You are on. Paypal good for you?
Done.
But you were still talking looney/dishonest when you tried to imply that the dems didn't outnumber the reps in the primary.
I never said that. I cant wait to get your $50 though
1. When Obama the marxist got elected and started appointing czars and taking over private industry and demonizing our very way of life - capitalism. "You've made enough money already"
2. Obama and the radicals he surrounds himself with
Ronald Reagan 1981–1989 1 1
George H. W. Bush 1989–1993 2 3
Bill Clinton 1993–2001 7 10
George W. Bush 2001–2009 35 47
Barack Obama 2009– 38 8
Ah, it's OK to run a huge deficit (AKA Bush), but not OK to run a really huge deficit (Obama).
That makes a lot of sense![]()
What isn't in dispute is their lack of ideas, no solutions, only useless shrieking at phantoms.
You can't paint any political group with a broad brush. The dems in particular are a diverse party consisting of some liberals, some union supporters who are otherwise not liberal, and some minorities who are socially conservative. Their base consists of union members, low income minorities, and highly paid urban professionals.
The tea party is a diverse group, but on the whole, polling shows that it is basically a very conservative group. I can see the tea party as being perhaps more diverse thant he republicaion party, but not more so, and probably less, than the democrats as a party.
Saying a group is diverse doesn't really mean a lot, because every group is diverse. The real question is HOW diverse.
- wolf
Wait a minute, I thought family dynasties were bad? You know, like Kennedys and Bushes?
Wait a minute, I thought family dynasties were bad? You know, like Kennedys and Bushes?
Yes, they are, and you also know full well that Ron and Rand do not represent a dynasty, nor the sort of corrupt lunacy inherent in the Kennedy and Bush families.
I didn't expect you to be consistent about family dynasties, it's only for the other guys.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The Paul's are hardly a "dynasty"...nice try though
Where is Kentucky at in the ratio of what it gives to the federal government and what it gets back?
They are 9th for federal funding received. The latest data shows they receive a $1.51 in federal funds for each tax dollar they pay.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------They are 9th for federal funding received. The latest data shows they receive a $1.51 in federal funds for each tax dollar they pay.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I somehow doubt those figures, but KY certainly benefits by having an ex Senate majority leader and current Senate minority leader.
Anyone care to speculate on how much KY bacon a Senator Rand Paul clout would bring in?
Be sure to make a donation to the campaign! Every little bit counts!
Rand Paul For U.S. Senate 2010
:thumbsup:
Siddharha sez, "It should not matter because Mr Paul is against bacon."
In other words you say Rand, unlike his father Ron will not do everything to pursue Pork for his district, after all its Ron Paul's political track record. Seriously sir, do you still believe in the tooth fairy and all political libertarian propaganda?
Tap your sarcasm meter.
The odds of the Tea Partiers and Mr Paul not accepting pork for Kentucky is as likely as my winning the Powerball lottery.
Happy days oh happy day oh taking the country back are we! We The People will put this country back on track and we WILL take our country back.
.
.
Against all the attacks of "Rand's crazy ideas" he still won.
I have a message, a message from the tea party, a message that is loud and clear and does not mince words: We have come to take our government back.
What surprised me? said Kaine. I didn't know this until my wife told me earlier today . . . the Kentucky primary drew more votes for the Democratic loser than for the Republican winner. That would not have been my prediction about that primary given how much it was hyped on the Republican side. And that tells me something about Democratic energy that is a little bit different than what some are saying.
Kaine made his remarks during the question-and-answer period which followed a lunchtime speech to the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. Kaine, a former Virginia governor who was handpicked by President Obama to lead the DNC, used his speech to offer an upbeat assessment of Democratic prospects in November.
The statistic cited by Kaine is correct: Lt. Gov. Daniel Mongiardo the Democrat who lost the Senate nomination to Attorney General Jack Conway garnered more votes than did Rand Paul, the Tea Party-backed Republican who won the GOPs Senate nomination. Mongiardos vote total was 221,269; Pauls vote total was 206,159.
Although the vote total statistic is correct, it is not the whole picture.
Registered Democrats in Kentucky outnumber Republicans by 573,139 voters.
Turnout, as a percentage of registered party voters, was actually higher in the Republican contest than in the Democratic contest, 33.6 percent as compared to 31.8 percent.
Don't ever link Palin with the tea party movement.
