The article said there was a second elector in Texas that won't vote for Trump.
There's been two electors that went public in Texas. One guy that rescinded his title since he wouldn't vote for Trump. He'll get appointed by another person who we do not know what they will vote. This elector has publicly said he will not vote for Trump. So he's technically been the second elector in Texas to say he won't vote for Trump. But really the only one that we *know* that isn't voting for him.
Besides, I checked the names and article I linked it was actually the same guy as in OP of this thread. So it was an unnecessary link.
Ah, you pushed I button I forgot I had. That actually shows the faintest glimmer of hope toward the longshot of stopping Monster Trump in his tracks. Texas and California were not only the two largest pieces of topography in the Union; they were 7% and 12% of the 1960 US population in general, and I don't think those ratios change through middle of the Bush years. Each has a pile of electoral votes following the number of congressional districts either directly or in proportion.
Two in Texas? Those are the ones who've come forward.
I could offer some encouragement. I'd sell out the Repubican Party to International Communism, the angels of Hell and Hell's angels without asking a dime. Proud to say it.
That's the sort of union we're in. How could you do that on a massive scale without hurting the remainder of the country? Maybe, noting Obama's speech today about the effectiveness of drone strikes, the well-placed letter-to-editor, a sharing of opinions and facts, one can be surgical.
Anyone thought of canceling their long-term customer relationships with this or that business whom you may have come to know as an Obama-hating Trump-worshipper? I asked my local Dem Party to put together a "Blue" list and give people the option of boycotting the Reds.
When I do that, I may make one last visit to the customer desk to unload a verbal shrapnel of explanation. Next best thing to slapping someone firmly in the face.
If I seem pissed off, I just finished following Obama's address to CENTCOM -- marvelous in its tone, content and balance. An Asshole congressman from new York was asked for comment after several others had weighed in to give the Prez a hand. He diminished, he disparaged, he denied -- vowing that Trump would take us in a new turn of foreign policy and military deployment.
If Obama had observed that we'd spent only $10 billion toward pushing ISIS into its little corner and retrieving Iraq over two years, what are the implications of "a new turn?"
I cannot respect in any way someone who supports Trump. The reason I've said that is that he leaves those not his supporters little room to reconfigure and adjust. He just slaps us in the face. And that's all he'll get from me, short of finding an opportunity to do it literally.
Facebook
Twitter