Quick Poll: Should Trump be Impeached?

[dank69]

You're just conceding to defeat, while the other possibility could potentially work and root out bullshit like gerrymandering and other antidemocratic practices.

It's a fool's deal to do as you suggest. if it came to pass that Hillary secured the SC, I bet the Republicans would have forced change to a staggered SC or something. I'm sure of it. People like Cruz were whining about it, and I bet that it would have only grown louder had they lost.

You are right that the GOP might do it in the future but I still think it is best to let them make the move first.

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

Here's another argument for invoking the 25th.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump...ter_impression=true&__twitter_impression=true

 

[Josephus312]

I'll await Muellers report before deciding this.

There is no reason to get ahead of ourselves and do something hastily that might increase Trumps power and support.

 

[Younigue]

Both lied to government entities to cover up the embarrassing fact of their sexual indiscretions. When it was Clinton lying to the grand jury seated by the special prosecutor your side said no big deal and we should “just move on.” Now Trump did the same thing only to the Federal Election Commission instead of in court. Naked partisanship is obviously the only reason why you think the earlier is OK but the later “a threat to the Republic” and an impeachable offense.

This is complete and utter bullshit. Trump paid hush money from campaign money and declared it on his taxes or some shit like that. A blow job from a consenting unpaid woman is far different from what Trump has been trying to conceal. His story regarding Stormy is ever evolving admitting more and more guilt as it goes.

I didn't give a fu*k about Clinton's affair because it is no where near what Trump has done. In fact if Trump got him some head from say Hope Hicks I wouldn't care about that either.

Stop being weird glenn.

 

[Jaskalas]

We (i.e. everyone against the toxic leftist agenda ) have already won the war...

Perhaps you won the battle, but your policies in the war are actually, slowly, killing you. A Republican President can be the King of ashes when trickle down is done with us.

 

[Josephus312]

Perhaps you won the battle, but your policies in the war are actually, slowly, killing you. A Republican President can be the King of ashes when trickle down is done with us.

Haven't won any battle either as far as I can see. Unless you are part of the 1%, one of Trumps friends or Russian there isn't going to be any benefits to you. There is no winning for anyone else going on.

 

[killster1]

Sure past Presidents have lied. But do you not agree that Trump has taken it to a new extreme? If we want our government to improve we have to take a stand and demand a higher ethics from our officials. If we allow the argument 'others have done it too' we are just giving license for the corruption to continue and to just keep getting worse. Every time we excuse a new act we have let the bar slide a little lower and then we can use that argument to excuse a even lower bar next time. At some point we have to say enough is enough.

I'm perfectly okay with saying that if a President lies to the American people he is taking the risk that he will be impeached for it.
I'm perfectly okay with saying that yes others have gotten away with it, but not any more. That starting today we will no longer stand for this.
I'm perfectly okay with expecting improvement from our government and not being resigned to it getting worse.

I like how you didnt say what he has done wrong. I dont know about his lies as i dont even watch the news just see little stories here and there and democrat's crying about them all. Id vote democrat if they didnt give away all the money to illegals!. i have been homeless before did you see me trying to get anything free. NOPE! If you have 10 kids so you cant hold a job how is that america problems Maybe they should take the kids away instead of enabling the behavior.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Hmmm.... Is there something in the Constitution specifying how many judges be on the SCOTUS? - Asking for a friend.

No there is not. It was last talked about by Franklin Roosevelt in 1937.

https://www.fjc.gov/history/timeline/fdrs-court-packing-plan

 

[jameny5]

They should bring back cruel and unusual punishment to these occupiers of Indian lands. Like the guillotine, firing squad or hanging. We would never hear of that corrupt business man in the "Crooked House" of AmeriKKKa again! Lawd I wish dis wood happen....

 

[jackstar7]

I like how you didnt say what he has done wrong. I dont know about his lies as i dont even watch the news just see little stories here and there and democrat's crying about them all. Id vote democrat if they didnt give away all the money to illegals!. i have been homeless before did you see me trying to get anything free. NOPE! If you have 10 kids so you cant hold a job how is that america problems Maybe they should take the kids away instead of enabling the behavior.

Dude. Stop.

 

[Maxima1]

You are right that the GOP might do it in the future but I still think it is best to let them make the move first.

They're already running roughshod over the Constitution and the rule of law. It's not only about Trump now, since the GOP is not acting with any hint of integrity. It doesn't make sense for confirmation of Kavanaugh to even go on now as well, and I see some have said as much (e.g. Tribe's recent article). Push back is necessary.

 

[Younigue]

I like how you didnt say what he has done wrong. I dont know about his lies as i dont even watch the news just see little stories here and there and democrat's crying about them all. Id vote democrat if they didnt give away all the money to illegals!. i have been homeless before did you see me trying to get anything free. NOPE! If you have 10 kids so you cant hold a job how is that america problems Maybe they should take the kids away instead of enabling the behavior.

Holy sh*t you're dumb as Fu*k.

Here's the formula I used to solve the mystery...

You don't watch news
You were homeless for a while
But here's the biggest most obvious clue... Every thing you say, every thought you express is just stupid. <--- I can leave all other clues out of the equation and that last one gives you away EVERY time.

Seriously dude, you're dumb.

 

[bermont33]

Hell no! He will be re-elected That's for sure We might put him in for a third term just too piss all you scatterbrains off

Sent from my LGMP260 using Tapatalk

 

[zinfamous]

-What does Obama have to do with Sharpton's taxes? ?

They're both black, Duh. Dude is both confused and of course really, really, really concerned.

 

[zinfamous]

Paul Welch is now a conservative I bet.

You should watch the latest episode of "Crowder Confronts" where he confronts an antifa member openly calling for the death of ICE agents and offers $500 for anyone to kill them. He also claimed he "wanted a piece of Crowder". When Crowder confronts him, he tries to assault him with a beer and then runs away like a pussy. This is who antifa really are - keyboard warriors who are tough behind a computer screen, but when the rubber meets the road they fold like a cheap lawn chair.
https://youtu.be/fTnb03ZHdkY

Also, my prediction is that youtube will start shadowbanning even moderate conservative voices with huge subscribers like Crowder and Shapiro very shortly. It's coming, folks. Just like 1984. It'll start with these private companies, continue with the feds (if the Left ever gets power again but they probably will since said private companies will install more politicians) and end with revolution once americans realized what's happening.

Youtube: for when retards have decided that Fox News is too irredeemably liberal.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

They're already running roughshod over the Constitution and the rule of law. It's not only about Trump now, since the GOP is not acting with any hint of integrity. It doesn't make sense for confirmation of Kavanaugh to even go on now as well, and I see some have said as much (e.g. Tribe's recent article). Push back is necessary.

"roughshod over the Constitution" "
How about a couple of examples of that hyperbolic claim?

Not voting on Kavanaugh's confirmation would be running roughshod over the Constitution if it was legally called for.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

"roughshod over the Constitution" "
How about a couple of examples of that hyperbolic claim?

Not voting on Kavanaugh's confirmation would be running roughshod over the Constitution if it was legally called for.

Merrick Garland says to go fuck yourself

 

[Viper1j]

Here's another argument for invoking the 25th.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump...ter_impression=true&__twitter_impression=true

The very best reason is that Donny is batshit crazy.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Merrick Garland says to go fuck yourself

OK dumbass, show me in the Constitution where a vote for a nominee is required over a certain time span? You can't and you won't. Nice lie though.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

OK dumbass, show me in the Constitution where a vote for a nominee is required over a certain time span? You can't and you won't. Nice lie though.

Sorry tajjy, I'm just the messenger, talk to Garland if you want the details.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Sorry tajjy, I'm just the messenger, talk to Garland if you want the details.

In that case it's the best reason EVER that the dumbfvck didn't get put through the confirmation process. He didn't know shit about the Constitution.

 

[alien42]

wtf, are these Russian trolls coming out of the woodwork or just crazy and desperate deplorables who figured out how to use a computer?

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

In that case it's the best reason EVER that the dumbfvck didn't get put through the confirmation process. He didn't know shit about the Constitution.

because you know more than

Garland, A native of the Chicago area, Garland graduated summa cum laude from Harvard College and graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School.

lol, ok, you Constitutional scholar you.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

because you know more than

lol, ok, you Constitutional scholar you.

No, but i sure as hell know more than you, which was the basis for my question in the first place. It's not my fault you're so damn ignorant.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

No, but i sure as hell know more than you, which was the basis for my question in the first place. It's not my fault you're so damn ignorant.

believe what you want to believe tajjy.
Usually people who boast about things like you do tend to be hiding behind feelings of inadequacy and insecurity. Gosh, who else does that very same thing.. what was his name again? Danny Dump? Derwood Clump? I forget, but yea, you two share those same 'qualities'