umbrella39
Lifer
- Jun 11, 2004
- 13,816
- 1,126
- 126
Diversion from what? Brice Ohrs testimony today?
Bruce ohrs? The guy that brought indictments against Russia's biggest mob boss?
Gee, I wonder why Congress, specifically Republicans, want to talk to him.
Traitors to the right of me, traitors above me and a traitor in the white house.
Enjoy your swamp.
Don't play into the off topic trolling...
What he did was far more direct actually if you remember the history of it.
In 1996 Chinese Intelligence Agents paid for Clinton's legal defense, and campaign, and offered direct money for influence in the WH, as well as agreeing to aid in future DNC media campaigns--which they all confessed openly before Congress (Confessions here). The FBI began investigating, not over "collusion" (no one was dumb enough back then to believe you could Collude.)--but due to campaign finance.
Reno then removed the FBI's normal DOJ liason leading the investigation under orders of Bill Clinton (Rahm Emanuel was openly saying he was telling Reno what to do for Clinton)-why? Because the FBI agent was questioning people in the Clinton Campaign, and Ms Ingersoll (The DoJ lawyer) was allowing it to spread too much. So Reno appointed someone hand picked by her and Bill Clinton. Charles La Belle, specifically to kill the case.
One problem. Labelle found so much dirty money, and literally video evidence of Gore and Clinton fund raising illegally ( the tapes were shown to the public at one point), that La Belle had no choice but to file a 17 page report stated unequivocally the Clintons had brazenly and wantonly violated campaign finance law, and that special counsel was needed due to the overwhelming interference by the WH, the Director of the FBI also said this. (Page 1376)
''It is difficult to imagine a more compelling situation for appointing an independent counsel,'' the Director, Louis J. Freeh
Reno's response? Lol. No.
"I am trying to follow the independent counsel statute as it has been framed by Congress," she said. "If you had a lower threshold, then any time somebody said 'boo' about a covered person, you'd trigger the independent counsel statute.
Reno closed down the investigation without prosecuting anyone in the WH, or even questioning anyone. The evidence was so overwhelming, that just a couple months of Congressional investigations found millions...MILLIONS in illegal fund raising, from foreign accounts, and payments to advertisers, and other entities.
What he did was far more direct actually if you remember the history of it.
In 1996 Chinese Intelligence Agents paid for Clinton's legal defense, and campaign, and offered direct money for influence in the WH, as well as agreeing to aid in future DNC media campaigns--which they all confessed openly before Congress (Confessions here). The FBI began investigating, not over "collusion" (no one was dumb enough back then to believe you could Collude.)--but due to campaign finance.
Reno then removed the FBI's normal DOJ liason leading the investigation under orders of Bill Clinton (Rahm Emanuel was openly saying he was telling Reno what to do for Clinton)-why? Because the FBI agent was questioning people in the Clinton Campaign, and Ms Ingersoll (The DoJ lawyer) was allowing it to spread too much. So Reno appointed someone hand picked by her and Bill Clinton. Charles La Belle, specifically to kill the case.
One problem. Labelle found so much dirty money, and literally video evidence of Gore and Clinton fund raising illegally ( the tapes were shown to the public at one point), that La Belle had no choice but to file a 17 page report stated unequivocally the Clintons had brazenly and wantonly violated campaign finance law, and that special counsel was needed due to the overwhelming interference by the WH, the Director of the FBI also said this. (Page 1376)
''It is difficult to imagine a more compelling situation for appointing an independent counsel,'' the Director, Louis J. Freeh
Reno's response? Lol. No.
"I am trying to follow the independent counsel statute as it has been framed by Congress," she said. "If you had a lower threshold, then any time somebody said 'boo' about a covered person, you'd trigger the independent counsel statute.
Reno closed down the investigation without prosecuting anyone in the WH, or even questioning anyone. The evidence was so overwhelming, that just a couple months of Congressional investigations found millions...MILLIONS in illegal fund raising, from foreign accounts, and payments to advertisers, and other entities.
It seems to me that most of your quotes don't match up with the links you provided, and your assertions (certainly the interesting ones) are entirely missing from the articles you cited (I highlighted the ones that don't seem to have any kind of match with the references articles). How on earth did Hillary even get a mention here? She was first lady at that time.
I didn't check the first link because I have no idea of the likely veracity of content found there.