• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Discussion Qualcomm Snapdragon Thread

Page 202 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I found another review with 2026 figures as well
cinebench1-snapdragon-x2-elite-benchmarks.png

Note that SC is SC not 1T.
 
The issues people had with the first gen Qualcomm wasn't the performance it was that they sucked as an actual Windows PC. Running benchmarks on it isn't telling people if they've fixed the driver and compatibility issues that caused so many returns in the 1st gen.
While no specifics were given, a couple of reviews noted significant advances in compatibility.
 
Screw it, I'll order one. Zenbook A16 has the right amount of memory for the price and decent performance.
Hopefully I can cope with Windows (especially -on-Arm) on a laptop. If not, it'll be sent back.
48GB for $1599 is a steal. You wil likely make more money on it if you keep for a couple of months and then sell it on ebay
 
Those look a bit flimsy. A16 should have come with larger battery - now there's just empty space. It feels like A14 in bigger chassis.
Often when they brag about a laptop being light it means it'll feel cheap and have a smaller battery than it should.

The Lenovo models look to be better built but they cost more.
 
Last edited:
Zenbook A16 has arrived. Screen looks great. No notch. Ceraluminum might be a marketing name but it feels nice whatever it is. Bloatware and stickers. They never learn. Fan noise is tolerable in normal usage. In whisper mode I haven't heard it using the web. Maybe they finally did it. In performance mode it is comically loud, so I am avoiding that even for the tests here. Track pad isn't bad except the click mechanism but you can avoid that.

It wants a 130W charger. That sucks because everyone in my family uses Apple laptops so our homes are littered with their 100W chargers. It'll be weeks before I know typical battery life.

It really sucks in Firefox. About 1/2 the score of a 9950X3D in Speedometer 3.1. Does okay in Chromium-based browsers. ~40 compared to ~50 for 9950X3D. It is a laptop, however, and it feels responsive so far despite that.

GB6.7
GB6.2 (No SME)
GB5.5

Cinebench 2026
Normal performance mode
616 ST
5977 MT
9.71x

Benchlight 0.9.7 (WSL)
101.gcc: 11.05
102.xz: 3.66
 
It really sucks in Firefox. About 1/2 the score of a 9950X3D in Speedometer 3.1. Does okay in Chromium-based browsers. ~40 compared to ~50 for 9950X3D. It is a laptop, however, and it feels responsive so far despite that.

GB6.7
GB6.2 (No SME)
GB5.5

Cinebench 2026
Normal performance mode
616 ST
5977 MT
9.71x

Benchlight 0.9.7 (WSL)
101.gcc: 11.05
102.xz: 3.66
SM3.1 performance figures are interesting. They do align with those in the reviews, however the reference device with X2E-96-100 would achieve 50+ (and yes, that's Edge, but its perf shouldn't be all that different from Chrome). Curious as to what's happening here. Would you mind trying SM3.1 with Edge?
1775759946870.png
 
Back
Top