• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Info PSA- Public impeachments start today- UPDATE 2/5/2020- Trump wins.

Page 148 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Vic said:
Empty threat. He doesn't have to worry about that because history is written by the victors. So instead of history saying "democracy went tits up," they'll write it to say "democracy threatened freedom (of the few) and had to be abandoned."
Click to expand...


I saw it more as a reminder.

I'm not so sure, the internet and population age breakdown kinda changes it this time I think. We'll see. Roberts has proven himself to side with the courts instead of party wishes in the past, maybe there's a chance. Personally I expect he'll do what is convenient to allow Team Treason to follow through with "The Deal," the one thing most important to the religulous right: getting rid of Roe v Wade.

The saying has proven true in the past, sure enough, but really the secular aspects of our society would seem to point to something other than complete religious conservative control. The school text book difference by state issue seems to support it for me.
 
imported_tajmahal said:
Sure, there were at least 17 witnesses along with thousands of documents. So it isn't an honest or accurate question from Lizzie.
Click to expand...

There would have been more if not for Trump's obstruction. Schiff's reply to the question affirms the integrity of Roberts but not of the Senate-

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Warren questions 'legitimacy' of Chief Justice Roberts during impeachment

Sen. Elizabeth Warren questioned the legitimacy of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts presiding over President Trump's Senate impeachment
www.washingtonexaminer.com www.washingtonexaminer.com

It's all predicated on Roberts casting a tie breaking vote which may never happen.

Meanwhile, Trump's lawyers in the Senate argue that subpoenas have to go through the courts as more Trump lawyers argue in court that impeachment is the only way to enforce congressional subpoenas. Go figure.

www.cnn.com

Adam Schiff: 'You can't make this stuff up' - CNN Video

Lead impeachment manager Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) drew laughter in the Senate while discussing the Justice Department lawyers' response while in court over resisting House subpoenas.
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
 
JEDIYoda said:
Even CNN during a breask in the action said -- Warren`s question crossed the line!!
Click to expand...

And somehow, you tie that your fictional statement of 17 witnesses and 1000's of documents that where never in the trial? Do you not understand that she crossed the line because she was addressing the Chief Justice, and was degrading towards him, which has nothing to do with your fiction.
 
NWRMidnight said:
And somehow, you tie that your fictional statement of 17 witnesses and 1000's of documents that where never in the trial? Do you not understand that she crossed the line because she was addressing the Chief Justice, and was degrading towards him, which has nothing to do with your fiction.
Click to expand...

When Roberts chose to read it then he regarded it as legitimate, unlike his refusal to do so with a question from Rand Paul.
 
NWRMidnight said:
And somehow, you tie that your fictional statement of 17 witnesses and 1000's of documents that where never in the trial? Do you not understand that she crossed the line because she was addressing the Chief Justice, and was degrading towards him, which has nothing to do with your fiction.
Click to expand...
I have made no statements of 17 witnesses or 1,000`s of documents!
I do know shew was addressing the Chief Justice and that it was degrading towards him! Which is why i brought it up in the first place!
Whatever personal issues you have you need to deal with!
I am 100% behind the impeachment of Trump!
Nowhere can you show that I made any claims............perhaps your drinking again?
 
NWRMidnight said:
And somehow, you tie that your fictional statement of 17 witnesses and 1000's of documents that where never in the trial? Do you not understand that she crossed the line because she was addressing the Chief Justice, and was degrading towards him, which has nothing to do with your fiction.
Click to expand...
My statement - ven CNN during a break in the action said -- Warren`s question crossed the line!!
How you can make all that out of my one statement is quite frankly troubling! You should perhaps seek professional help....
 
emperus said:
Warren Crossed the line? Please. What crosses the line is this sham of a trial and all these senators who care more about themselves and their "sensibilities" than the oath of office they took.
Click to expand...
Sham....yes!
But Warren did cross the line when she was addressing the Chief Justice, and was degrading towards him! He had no choice in his participation!
Plus if you mean a scam by the Republicans -- then I agree!!
 
Lamar Alexander is a no! He said he doesn't need any more witnesses because it doesn't meet the high bar for removal and that the people should vote and voice their opinion as to how they feel about what happened. But, how can the American people make up their mind without the FUXING FACTS!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top