Info PSA- Public impeachments start today- UPDATE 2/5/2020- Trump wins.

[JEDIYoda]

What impeachment trial are you watching?

Even CNN during a breask in the action said -- Warren`s question crossed the line!!

 

[cytg111]

Sure, there were at least 17 witnesses along with thousands of documents. So it isn't an honest or accurate question from Lizzie.

Enjoy your king Emperor .. your wettest dream is about to come true. Congrats.

 

[Vic]

Enjoy your king Emperor .. your wettest dream is about to come true. Congrats.

Remember when Republicans would freak out that Obama was trying to make himself a king and above the law?

 

[ivwshane]

Remember when Republicans would freak out that Obama was trying to make himself a king and above the law?

Clearly they were projecting.

 

[kage69]

Empty threat. He doesn't have to worry about that because history is written by the victors. So instead of history saying "democracy went tits up," they'll write it to say "democracy threatened freedom (of the few) and had to be abandoned."

I saw it more as a reminder.

I'm not so sure, the internet and population age breakdown kinda changes it this time I think. We'll see. Roberts has proven himself to side with the courts instead of party wishes in the past, maybe there's a chance. Personally I expect he'll do what is convenient to allow Team Treason to follow through with "The Deal," the one thing most important to the religulous right: getting rid of Roe v Wade.

The saying has proven true in the past, sure enough, but really the secular aspects of our society would seem to point to something other than complete religious conservative control. The school text book difference by state issue seems to support it for me.

 

[Jhhnn]

Sure, there were at least 17 witnesses along with thousands of documents. So it isn't an honest or accurate question from Lizzie.

There would have been more if not for Trump's obstruction. Schiff's reply to the question affirms the integrity of Roberts but not of the Senate-

Warren questions 'legitimacy' of Chief Justice Roberts during impeachment

Sen. Elizabeth Warren questioned the legitimacy of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts presiding over President Trump's Senate impeachment

www.washingtonexaminer.com

It's all predicated on Roberts casting a tie breaking vote which may never happen.

Meanwhile, Trump's lawyers in the Senate argue that subpoenas have to go through the courts as more Trump lawyers argue in court that impeachment is the only way to enforce congressional subpoenas. Go figure.

Adam Schiff: 'You can't make this stuff up' - CNN Video

Lead impeachment manager Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) drew laughter in the Senate while discussing the Justice Department lawyers' response while in court over resisting House subpoenas.

www.cnn.com

 

[Victorian Gray]

Reduced? That is his default state.

It's that he no longer tries to 'hide' them in anyway

 

[Victorian Gray]

Can't be reduced to what you always were.

It's that he's no longer even trying (badly) to pretend. And he's not alone.

 

[NWRMidnight]

Even CNN during a breask in the action said -- Warren`s question crossed the line!!

And somehow, you tie that your fictional statement of 17 witnesses and 1000's of documents that where never in the trial? Do you not understand that she crossed the line because she was addressing the Chief Justice, and was degrading towards him, which has nothing to do with your fiction.

 

[Jhhnn]

And somehow, you tie that your fictional statement of 17 witnesses and 1000's of documents that where never in the trial? Do you not understand that she crossed the line because she was addressing the Chief Justice, and was degrading towards him, which has nothing to do with your fiction.

When Roberts chose to read it then he regarded it as legitimate, unlike his refusal to do so with a question from Rand Paul.

 

[conehead433]

Rand Paul shoul be thrown in jail without bail for revealing the whistleblower. Basically he put out a death warrant for the aforementioned.

 

[akenbennu]

It appears Philbin believes there's just nothing a President can do to be impeached.

 

[JEDIYoda]

And somehow, you tie that your fictional statement of 17 witnesses and 1000's of documents that where never in the trial? Do you not understand that she crossed the line because she was addressing the Chief Justice, and was degrading towards him, which has nothing to do with your fiction.

I have made no statements of 17 witnesses or 1,000`s of documents!
I do know shew was addressing the Chief Justice and that it was degrading towards him! Which is why i brought it up in the first place!
Whatever personal issues you have you need to deal with!
I am 100% behind the impeachment of Trump!
Nowhere can you show that I made any claims............perhaps your drinking again?

 

[UNCjigga]

It appears Philbin believes there's just nothing a President can do to be impeached.

Philbin: “Even if everything the House alleges is true and Bolton testifies under oath to everything in the manuscript...well too bad that’s not impeachable!”

 

[JEDIYoda]

And somehow, you tie that your fictional statement of 17 witnesses and 1000's of documents that where never in the trial? Do you not understand that she crossed the line because she was addressing the Chief Justice, and was degrading towards him, which has nothing to do with your fiction.

My statement - ven CNN during a break in the action said -- Warren`s question crossed the line!!
How you can make all that out of my one statement is quite frankly troubling! You should perhaps seek professional help....

 

[JEDIYoda]

And somehow, you tie that your fictional statement ....

I contend that your life is fictional....

 

[ivwshane]

Oh boy! Sekulow is now throwing out the “Biden” rule. I swear, Biden is the most powerful congressman there ever was. He created policy simply by speaking.

Good god!

 

[akenbennu]

Might not have wanted to bring up Michael Flynn there.

 

[pcgeek11]

Rand Paul needs to be arrested.

For what exactly?

 

[emperus]

Even CNN during a breask in the action said -- Warren`s question crossed the line!!

Warren Crossed the line? Please. What crosses the line is this sham of a trial and all these senators who care more about themselves and their "sensibilities" than the oath of office they took.

 

[JEDIYoda]

Warren Crossed the line? Please. What crosses the line is this sham of a trial and all these senators who care more about themselves and their "sensibilities" than the oath of office they took.

Sham....yes!
But Warren did cross the line when she was addressing the Chief Justice, and was degrading towards him! He had no choice in his participation!
Plus if you mean a scam by the Republicans -- then I agree!!

 

[JEDIYoda]

For what exactly?

Rand Paul is hell bent on outting the whistleblower! He needs to be arrested or silenced!!

 

[conehead433]

For what exactly?

He revealeed the name of the whistlebower on his twitter account in violation of federal law protecting whistleblowers. Basically he put a bullseye on the same targeting him/her for extermination with extreme prejudice.

 

[emperus]

Lamar Alexander is a no! He said he doesn't need any more witnesses because it doesn't meet the high bar for removal and that the people should vote and voice their opinion as to how they feel about what happened. But, how can the American people make up their mind without the FUXING FACTS!

 

[MomentsofSanity]

Lamar Alexander a no on witnesses. This is over folks.