Originally posted by: dennilfloss
Science is the domain of the mind. Faith is the domain of the heart and soul. They are separate and complementary. One does not acquire faith through reason and deduction, one feels it from within.
As a Catholic paleontologist, I accept evolution. In fact, paleontology and biology need evolution to make sense.
Originally posted by: TheTony
You might want to clarify your OP/title.
Fact is, the Catholic church allows for the theory of evolution and has for years.
Originally posted by: TheTony
Well, last time I checked, Catholics were Christians.
I wouldn't have thought it worth mentioning, but others in the thread use them interchangably, so it's worth clarifying, I thought.
Back to this evolving discussion....
Originally posted by: TheTony
Well, last time I checked, Catholics were Christians.
I wouldn't have thought it worth mentioning, but others in the thread use them interchangably, so it's worth clarifying, I thought.
Back to this evolving discussion....
Originally posted by: miniMUNCH
Evolution and creationism are not at odds, as dennifloss alluded to.
Evolution is simply a mechanism and means for creation IMO.
The bible says absolutely nothing about how "creation" was actually accomplished... i.e. by what physical and biological phenomena did creation occur. That man evolved from lesser organisms is no less miraculous to me than if he 'poofed' out of thin air or rose up out of the dust.
Christians run into all kinds of problems when they try to literally interpret Genesis. Genesis is metaphor and poetry just like Revelations, many of Psalms, the Song of Solomon, etc.
For instance, to think God literally cast out two people named Adam and Eve out of the 'garden of Eden' for eating a piece of fruit is completely naive. Moreover, it a position which is ignorant of the position and teaching of the early church which is well documented.
The sooner we Christians as a whole gets this through our collective thick heads, the better.
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
Originally posted by: miniMUNCH
Evolution and creationism are not at odds, as dennifloss alluded to.
Evolution is simply a mechanism and means for creation IMO.
The bible says absolutely nothing about how "creation" was actually accomplished... i.e. by what physical and biological phenomena did creation occur. That man evolved from lesser organisms is no less miraculous to me than if he 'poofed' out of thin air or rose up out of the dust.
Christians run into all kinds of problems when they try to literally interpret Genesis. Genesis is metaphor and poetry just like Revelations, many of Psalms, the Song of Solomon, etc.
For instance, to think God literally cast out two people named Adam and Eve out of the 'garden of Eden' for eating a piece of fruit is completely naive. Moreover, it a position which is ignorant of the position and teaching of the early church which is well documented.
The sooner we Christians as a whole gets this through our collective thick heads, the better.
And who are you to say that the account of creation, Adam and Eve, and the garden of Eden weren't literal? Why is there a problem with it?
Originally posted by: Luthien
Christians do not consider themselves catholics. How do I know this; I have lived with christians my entire life and they think catholics are going to hell. Catholics however it is true do consider themselves christians, lol.
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
Originally posted by: miniMUNCH
Evolution and creationism are not at odds, as dennifloss alluded to.
Evolution is simply a mechanism and means for creation IMO.
The bible says absolutely nothing about how "creation" was actually accomplished... i.e. by what physical and biological phenomena did creation occur. That man evolved from lesser organisms is no less miraculous to me than if he 'poofed' out of thin air or rose up out of the dust.
Christians run into all kinds of problems when they try to literally interpret Genesis. Genesis is metaphor and poetry just like Revelations, many of Psalms, the Song of Solomon, etc.
For instance, to think God literally cast out two people named Adam and Eve out of the 'garden of Eden' for eating a piece of fruit is completely naive. Moreover, it a position which is ignorant of the position and teaching of the early church which is well documented.
The sooner we Christians as a whole gets this through our collective thick heads, the better.
And who are you to say that the account of creation, Adam and Eve, and the garden of Eden weren't literal? Why is there a problem with it?
Who are you to say it IS literal?

 
				
		