-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
Its vega arch not polaris.
At writeup
https://www.anandtech.com/show/1315...zen-soc-with-24-vega-cus-for-chinese-consoles
Gideon
Platinum Member
I still wonder what happened to Mobile-Vega. How come there still are no design-wins for that, if there are for that Vega-Kabylake frankenstein?
On paper it looks like an excellent RX 560X replacement (for instance in the more-expensive 15" mac-books) and a good competitor to mobile 1050-1060 (unlike the aforementioned 560X). Did they get no design-wins and decided to scrap it? Or did intel threaten them or something ...
William Gaatjes
Lifer
The article mentions embedded but likely on package.
That would probably mean an MCM i guess if true. But a board with gddr5 chips around the soc are more likely.
The issue with package on package is that it is more difficult to get the heat out of the SOC die since the ram is on top of it and between the SOC and the heatsink.
Also, dram cells starts to function worse when heated.
With telephone and tablet soc not really an issue since these are low power, a mere few watts total for all the dies combined in the package at full speed.
But with a desktop/gameconsole system running a sort of beefed up and modified ryzen 2400, that is going to be an issue for as far as i know.
Even if it is just for example a 35W chip.
Makes me wonder, if it is an advantage of an MCM being harder to reverse engineer in comparison to a motherboard with soc and separate dram. Also an MCM is harder to hack, i think because no pcb traces.
And yes, edram is also on chip but that is low in amount of dram cells compared to modern GDDR4 and GDDR5 chips.
Probably edram is build in such a way that it can handle the heat of the cpu next to it and it is next to the cpu cores, not on top of it.
Schmide
Diamond Member
Still basically the same thing. At most vega is 5% better even with HBM or about one CU.
Fine its a 565.859375
nVidia pretty much has cornered the market for gaming laptops. Even Intel's marketing might is hopeless against it. It's probably not good enough to tempt OEMs, especially when you factor that the 11 series was probably intended to be out by now.
IntelUser2000
Elite Member
Nothing to do with marketing. On the GPU Nvidia is simply better that's why. Vega is acceptable on desktops with worse perf/w, but that's a whole different story on laptops. Also imagine the cost disadvantage of a Vega M GPU with HBM2 versus GDDR5 GTX 1060.
The problem is that no matter if you have a better GPU, if you don't have a CPU, you are royally screwed up.
Intel is about to develop a decent GPU in 2 years and AMD has an offering too.
What has nVIDIA on the CPU department?
Also, VIA is trying to catch up on the GPU department and I won't be surprised if they works with Power VR to achieve that.
IntelUser2000
Elite Member
Nvidia is so far ahead on the GPU front, as long as they keep it up I doubt they need to worry. They practically created the current DL market, and there's no competition to CUDA and GPU acceleration for workstations.
Remember the Iris Pro parts? The discrete Nvidia parts beat them in battery life, in load power consumption, and of course performance. Nvidia wanted to basically kill the Iris Pro from the get-go so they priced it attractively too. Granted they were going against Intel, the company not known for cheap products. Kaby-G doesn't look like anything special either.
They execute in a fantastic fashion, fueled by experienced well treated employees. The company has a high employee retention rate, something that Intel can't boast about(no doubt current problems are a result of this).
Indeed, but Intel Iris Pro was done without any GPU department master.
However now with Raja everything changes.
They will relegate nVIDIA on higher tier machines.
And both (Intel and AMD) would recommend the OEM to go with their solutions first besides nVIDIA even switching between them.
IntelUser2000
Elite Member
Raja's team made Vega, which was not impressive at all.
And some believe and propagate the conspiracy theory that Nvidia had to do with KBL-G systems being rare. No, the reality is KBL-G is a niche part. Battery life is like a discrete GPU system, and the whole thing is expensive. KBL-G is a better Iris Pro.
Intel somehow missed out on the potential with KBL-G. The Vega part does not seem to be capable of shutting itself down when idle. They claim having it on package allowed power sharing to happen. Could they have not took extra time to turn off the GPU to improve battery life?
No OEM will do this if the discrete Nvidia part is superior. They can do it for a while but eventually they'll decide not to.
PeterScott
Platinum Member
It would be interesting to see how it turns out. A 4 CPU core with about RX 560+ performance, would mainly be interesting for custom SFF entry level gaming. The main annoying part is it would probably be limited to 8GB of RAM (putting in 16GB of GDDR5 would probably up the price too much) and that is split between CPU and GPU.
PeterScott
Platinum Member
It actually looks like AMD isn't releasing the product at all yet. I would bet on the cost being the biggest factor, likely related to HBM pricing (possibly higher than projected when announced) making it uneconomical at this end of the market.
rancherlee
Senior member
Should beat down the XB1 XB1S and PS4. It should be on par or slightly ahead of the PS4pro on the GPU side with much more CPU power. Xbox one X has quite a bit more graphics punch and 4gb more ram but the 3ghz Ryzen should have about 50% more power over the 8 core Jaguar, but that side comes down to how well the operating system is designed. Interesting design and I'm sure it the basis for the next Xbox and PS design.
TheELF
Diamond Member
Number one concern for every console up to this day was power consumption/cooling,PS and xbox consoles have come out that would just die on consumers because of this (ring of death and so on)
If it turns up in a console it will never be at 3Ghz. (maybe for one single core boost but that would cause stutter so not even)
PeterScott
Platinum Member
As a console, this will never leave China, so that comparison is kind of moot for most people. Even in China, it probably won't do that well as a console.
For most of the world this is mainly of interest as a SFF entry level gaming PC, which might see exports.
As a PC the GPU power is almost in the middle between RX 560 and RX 570. Or between GTX 1050Ti and GTX 1060 3GB in NVidia terms, with a modern 3GHz quad core.
So a solid little entry level gaming PC, but nothing super special on performance, just potentially nice small size for a decent price.
Pricing and packaging would determine how good it is. But I certainly welcome more SFF entry level gaming machines.
Competition would be things like the Deskmini RX/GTX.
also it can be 128bit GDDR5, Xbox One X is 384 bit and even the PS4 256bit
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 24K
-
-
