IronWing
No Lifer
- Jul 20, 2001
- 69,045
- 26,923
- 136
So what’s your position again?Nobody said that the birth was illegal.
So what’s your position again?Nobody said that the birth was illegal.
ALL of those problems would be solved by granting citizenship to all of the illegal immigrants who proved themselves as otherwise law-abiding, worthy, and hard working members of society.
ALL of those problems would be solved by granting citizenship to all of the illegal immigrants who proved themselves as otherwise law-abiding, worthy, and hard working members of society.
Since when breaking immigration rules and laws = law-abiding?
And the millions and millions of law-abiding, worthy, and hardworking LEGAL immigrants can continue their wait in vain for years and years to get in the LEGAL way.
Since you don't count speeding as making you a criminal. Breaking immigration laws is roughly the legal equivalent of doing 45 in a 30 zone.
Here is an idea, how about we make it easier for all of them to become citizens so no one has to wait years. That would be fair right?
So don't say them ILLEGALS as "law-abiding". Like saying DT is kind and moderate.
LEGALS should be processed first before ILLEGALS.
Let see you sneak in/overstay any sovereign country and then claim it is only like speeding.
No reply to my last question from above?
Can you or any of you tell me one, just one, sovereign country on Earth with a centralized government that you can sneak in or overstay your visa and then will be granted citizenship after a few years?
People can not be illegal. The very concept is against the founding principles of this nation. They are abiding by the laws of the nation the live in. Maybe entering the nation was illegal, but that is past tense, you can not be in a constant state of 'legal' or 'illegal' it does not work that way. Breaking the law is an act, not a state of being. So, if you break the law you have committed an act that was illegal (and even then only if a court of your peers decides so), that does not make you illegal. The act is illegal, not the person.
Then don't complain about undocumented immigrants until you finish processing the documented ones first.
I'm not in another country am I? And by the way the myth that every other country is tougher on immigration is a complete fantasy. America is about in the middle as far as immigration policy goes.
You talking about this question?
I can name one off the top of my head, Spain.
- https://www.voanews.com/a/spain-orders-mass-deportation-of-african-migrants/4551044.htmlSpain, known for having one of the most tolerant immigration policies in Europe and accepting boatloads of migrants when no other EU nation would, was expected to open its doors even wider under its new socialist government. But that policy now appears to be going in reverse.
More like there's not enough opportunities to make money through corruption. ICE agents would lose their 6-figure govt jobs, Republican-voting employers would lose their cheap labor, and Republican politicians and talking heads wouldn't lose a crucial issue to fearmonger voters over.Too easy.
Since when breaking immigration rules and laws = law-abiding?
And the millions and millions of law-abiding, worthy, and hardworking LEGAL immigrants can continue their wait in vain for years and years to get in the LEGAL way. Where are the "fairness", "equality", "inclusive" and all of the bullcrap you guys have been preaching?
Fuck them, right? Why even bother pretending to have immigration rules and laws? What a bunch of fools, trying to do things the right way. /s
One more thing. Can you or any of you tell me one, just one, sovereign country on Earth with a centralized government that you can sneak in or overstay your visa and then will be granted citizenship after a few years? Uh huh.
Funny, I was so careful to say "OTHERWISE law-abiding," but of course the resident mindless ranting xenophobe here can't read.
Since when breaking immigration rules and laws = law-abiding?
And the millions and millions of law-abiding, worthy, and hardworking LEGAL immigrants can continue their wait in vain for years and years to get in the LEGAL way. Where are the "fairness", "equality", "inclusive" and all of the bullcrap you guys have been preaching?
Fvck them, right? Why even bother pretending to have immigration rules and laws? What a bunch of fools, trying to do things the right way. /s.
That's pretty much what Malaria's parents said after Donny pushed them to the front of the line..
Let me make it clear. They are ILLEGAL aliens. Not undocumented immigrants.
Let me make myself clear. People can not be illegal. That is the rhetoric that allows for gas chambers. This is the last I will say on this. I will not debate you as long as you continue to use rhetoric intended to dehumanize people.
I am just calling they are what they are. A spade as a spade. I don't care whether they are black/white/brown/green/yellow, gay or straight or whatever. Everyone (no exception) need to either follow the rules/laws or pay the consequence(s).
You seem to be looking for a final solution.
Well, of course, you don't want all of the laws enforced equally and with no exception. That's just almost childish in its naivete.Hummm... wanting everyone to follow existing immigration rules and laws equally, no exception = xenophobic now?
Another perfect example of "calm and measured" post from Vic.
Keep digging for more excuses and labels.
Since you don't count speeding as making you a criminal. Breaking immigration laws is roughly the legal equivalent of doing 45 in a 30 zone.
Here is an idea, how about we make it easier for all of them to become citizens so no one has to wait years. That would be fair right?
Let me make myself perfectly clear. This is what I said before and I will say it again.
"everyone to follow existing immigration rules and laws equally, no exception"
I dare you or anyone to find anything from my posts and quote me as an advocate of any type of violent or mistreatment toward ILLEGALS.
I would just say that he seems oblivious to the fact that his ideas might have unintended negative consequences.You seem to be looking for a final solution.
Well, of course, you don't want all of the laws enforced equally and with no exception. That's just almost childish in its naivete.
But tell ya what, I'll take you up on that challenge. Let's finally enforce all of the laws equally and without any exception. I would be all for that. Because the best way IMO to get unpopular laws changed or repealed is to actually enforce them, equally and without exception.
Since you don't count speeding as making you a criminal. Breaking immigration laws is roughly the legal equivalent of doing 45 in a 30 zone.
Except that the people who are the subject of this thread aren't immigrants but rather native born citizens, America's children. Their welfare doesn't concern you at all, apparently.
Could you just imagine how quickly some of the ridiculously low highway speed limits in some areas of this country would be changed in every single speeding violation actually resulted in enforcement?
Gotta love how you guys use logic.
a) This is ok for me: speeding enforces to all.
b) This is not ok: speeding enforces for certain group but lets others in other groups go.
See my point yet?