so once again we really arent making much progress. a 760ti will cost probably 300 bucks which the 670 should be by now anyway. I paid 230 for 660ti which is the best deal i have seen and came with AC 3. that means if i want a 760ti it will cost about 75% more for a 15-20% gain at most. the last 2 years have been a joke if looking for real performance increase and bang for buck. standard pricing sucks and most of the deals have been VERY short lived.
well I dont really care who is to blame though. i am just saying from a consumers standpoint the standard pricing sucks right now.
The price wars of the HD4xxx vs GTX 2xx era are long over. Get used to it. Even if Intel got into the game, you know they wouldn't do anything to help with price/performance. If you don't like it, start your own performance GPU company.
My prediction, assuming the rumors are true, are efficiency gains with a 10-13% performance increase.
GTX 760 Ti is a clock bumped GTX 670 . so you can expect a max of 8 - 10% better performance assuming they clock the GTX 760 Ti to 1100 mhz boost. GTX 770 seems to be a clock bumped GTX 680 with 4 GB VRAM. so this would match the HD 7970 Ghz. the GTX 780 aka Titan LE based on GK110 chip is expected to sell for USD 550 - 600. so all GK110 based chips are going to sell for USD 500+. thats disappointing. AMD really screwed up this gen. if they had a refresh to Tahiti HD 7970 similar to what Bonaire HD 7790 is to Cape Verde HD 7770 we would have seen better pricing at the high end.
IMO, nVidia won't release a "GTX-780" that isn't at least 10%-15% faster than the 7970GHz.
thats very easy to achieve. GTX 780 aka Titan LE will split the perf gap between Titan and HD7970 Ghz. Titan is on average 33 % faster than HD7970 Ghz. its easy for GTX 780 aka Titan LE to beat HD 7970 Ghz by 15 - 17%.
So you think there's going to be a 15%-17% difference between the 780 and the 770?
http://www.brightsideofnews.com/new...2c-gtx770-is-gtx6802c-gtx760ti-is-gtx670.aspx
HD 7970 Ghz is faster on average than GTX 680. so the gap between GTX 780 and GTX 770 could be 20 - 25%. its more or less confirmed what Nvidia's GTX 700 product stack is .
GTX 780 aka Titan LE - GK110 chip with 2496 cuda cores at 900 mhz boost , 320 bit memory, 40 ROPs, 5 GB GDDR5. USD 550 - 600
GTX 770 - GK104 chip with 1536 cuda cores, 1150 - 1200 mhz boost, 256 bit memory, 32 ROPs, 4GB GDDR5. USD 400.
GTX 760 Ti - GK104 chip with 1344 cuda cores, 1100 mhz boost, 256 bit memory, 32 ROPS, 2 GB GDDR5. USD 300
http://www.brightsideofnews.com/new...2c-gtx770-is-gtx6802c-gtx760ti-is-gtx670.aspx
HD 7970 Ghz is faster on average than GTX 680. so the gap between GTX 780 and GTX 770 could be 20 - 25%. its more or less confirmed what Nvidia's GTX 700 product stack is .
GTX 780 aka Titan LE - GK110 chip with 2496 cuda cores at 900 mhz boost , 320 bit memory, 40 ROPs, 5 GB GDDR5. USD 550 - 600
GTX 770 - GK104 chip with 1536 cuda cores, 1150 - 1200 mhz boost, 256 bit memory, 32 ROPs, 4GB GDDR5. USD 400.
GTX 760 Ti - GK104 chip with 1344 cuda cores, 1100 mhz boost, 256 bit memory, 32 ROPS, 2 GB GDDR5. USD 300
I don't see 1100mhz boost on this. Since the stock 670 is due a 985 boost, I suspect 1000 or 1025 boost.
it was an asinine thing to say. really just stfu if you cant come up with anything better than telling someone to start their own gpu business. I guess I will get on that after I start my own oil company.And I'm sure your kvetching about it is going to bring down video card prices, amirite?
what is the point of a new generation if you can't beat the older gen cards by atleast 20%. the stock GTX 670 is 15% faster than GTX 660 Ti. GTX 670 OC cards boosted to 1084 Mhz . we are a year and half into the 28nm process. so Nvidia can easily boost to 1100 Mhz for GTX 760 Ti and beat GTX 660 Ti by 20 - 25%. similarly for a GTX 770 at 1150 - 1200 mhz compared to 980 mhz GTX 670.