Post a pic of your bike

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

LS20

Banned
Jan 22, 2002
5,858
0
0
Originally posted by: DaShen

When you start doing centuries though, thing become a little nicer on difference types of bikes.
...which is hugely attributed to Geometry, not material

Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
I don't think a carbon seatpost makes a bit of difference on a bike. However, if you make the entire frame out of CF it will make a difference. Oh, and I do think that construction makes a difference as well. Are there aluminum bikes that have good ride qualities? I'm sure there are but I have yet to ride one. I know for a fact that there are plenty of aluminum bikes with very poor ride qualities.
And yes, I can tell a difference.
There are 2 components to "comfort" - the first is geometry which determines body positioning.. the 2nd is what people love to laud as dampening or absorption

a bicyclist sits on foam-cushioned saddles, mounted with 2 pencil-thin saddle rails, on a megastiff [steel/cf/alum/ti] frame, on top of air-filled rubber tires. with all of that in mind, how much difference does the a change in frame affect the transmission of the "road" to the rider? unless the rider is like the princess and the pea...

following don vito, bike frames arent solid cubes of raw material, but rather composed of multiple tubes. so people can cite metallurgical numbers, but its meaningless unless they consider the final product. specific alloy, thicknesses , diameter , etc, can affect stiffness, strength, etc.

so an aluminum bike can be made soft (vitus) or stiff (cannondale), as can carbon fiber (old spec epic allez vs modern willier), as can steel (old 531 vs merckx mxleader)

so to say a bike is comfortable , or harsh , or stiff , or soft , due to it being simply steel/cf/ti/alum is very incorrect
 

DaShen

Lifer
Dec 1, 2000
10,710
1
0
Originally posted by: Hammerhead
Originally posted by: cheapgoose
Originally posted by: DaShen
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: loic2003
Must be really tough trying to not look like a homosexual on that bike.

You're implying I have trouble looking gay when you look like THIS?

http://www.frenchgeek.com/imageslg/aus8.jpg

LOL :laugh:

*EDIT*
I am Amused. :D


lol...:beer:

motion to make this a pwnage of the year nominee...

Seconded... can someone read the minutes, so that we can record this. ;)
 

luv2liv

Diamond Member
Dec 27, 2001
3,502
94
91
how come everybody's bike is so clean??? as if its not ridden? :)

this is how i roll in da woods.
love it since i first saw it in bicyling mag.
 

trOver

Golden Member
Aug 18, 2006
1,417
0
0
Originally posted by: luv2liv
how come everybody's bike is so clean??? as if its not ridden? :)

this is how i roll in da woods.
love it since i first saw it in bicyling mag.

that thing is sweet! should i post my electric bike that does 40?
 

CraigRT

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
31,440
5
0
I currently have a 2006 model Trek 8000 disc. I am on my lappy and no pics.

I am considering pulling the trigger on an '07 Trek Fuel EX-9.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,580
982
126
Originally posted by: luv2liv
how come everybody's bike is so clean??? as if its not ridden? :)

this is how i roll in da woods.
love it since i first saw it in bicyling mag.

Mine is clean in those pics because I cleaned it right before I took the pic. I generally clean and lube whatever bike I'm riding every couple weeks.
 

loic2003

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2003
3,844
0
0
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: loic2003
Must be really tough trying to not look like a homosexual on that bike.

You're implying I have trouble looking gay when you look like THIS?

http://www.frenchgeek.com/imageslg/aus8.jpg

:D touche! Not the butchest pic, but those same looks have always gotten results. Clearly having my site in my sig demonstrates I'm more than happy with my appearance, and my confidence certainly isn't unfounded. I don't feel the need to hide behind the anonymity of the internet whatsoever...

I do have a strong dislike to harleys simply because they're purely designed for showing off. They're the attention whore of the motorbike world. Brash, loud, slow and shiny. The riders usually wear open-face helmets so everyone can see who they are. They're anything but a rider's bike... I mean, loads don't even have rear suspension; something that even the lowest of the low, most basic moped has. It also shows a clear lack of insight when it comes to choice. Like a nouveau-riche feller jumping out and buying a porsche or ferrari when there's far more interesting and exotic vehicles out there that would provide more of a talking point, and (if they wanted it) more heads turned.

Harleys also are hugely dated. It's typically very american, sticking to a technology that was good in the hay-day, never truly moving forward. Noisy, spluttering, inefficient and poor-handling by today's standards. These days there's so many awesome torque-sports bikes out there that are more fun, more reliable, have far better handling, and so on. A couple of examples that I posted in another thread:

Moto Guzzi Breva 1100
Moto Morini 1200
Yamaha MT-01

Seriously beefy bikes that look freaking awesome, but don't have the stigma of harley-freaking-davidson atached to it. I mean, look at the bike meets! All those skulls, chrome, leather tassles, beer guts and receeding hair-lines. It's just not cool. Coupled with the fact that 90% of bikers give each other the nod as they pass, whereas harley riders always have a stupid "I'm bad to the bone" face on as they rasp around on their attention-mobiles and never acknowledge anyone else. There's even a few harley riders that go to the bike meets I attend, and even then they never talk to anyone when we're all sitting around. It's weird behaviour.

Whatever. Stick to your HD; I'm sure you paid a small fortune for it, and I guess some like to potter about on a noise machine. Do have a look around at the above models I posted and see what you think, maybe I'll be able to persuade you away from chrome-land! Funny response above, though, and I'll even stand up and nominate myself if you like. 'tis a good thing to not be so proud as to be able to laugh at yourself.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,352
19,530
146
All that wasted typing.

If I have to explain, loic2003, you wouldn't understand... and you obviously do not.
 

loic2003

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2003
3,844
0
0
Originally posted by: Amused
All that wasted typing.

If I have to explain, loic2003, you wouldn't understand... and you obviously do not.
Try me, I'm genuinely curious in the appeal of these things.

Maybe I'll take one for a test ride this weekend and see if it suddenly dawns on me just how awesome it is. I'm skeptical, though....
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,352
19,530
146
Originally posted by: loic2003
Originally posted by: Amused
All that wasted typing.

If I have to explain, loic2003, you wouldn't understand... and you obviously do not.
Try me, I'm genuinely curious in the appeal of these things.

Maybe I'll take one for a test ride this weekend and see if it suddenly dawns on me just how awesome it is. I'm skeptical, though....

OK, one try:

I rode sport bikes for 20 years. Performance on two wheels no longer appeals to me. In fact, I was looking for a ride that slows me down.

I don't know about the UK, but here in the states the nicest folks ride cruisers. Typically younger squidly types ride sport bikes. And let's face it, I'll be 40 this year. I fit in with the older crowd now.

A Harley is like buying a vintage bike without the repair headaches... and holds it's value just as well. Before I bought the Harley, I was looking into buying and refurbishing a 1930s or 40s bike. I find vintage bikes to be the most beautiful thing on two wheels.

Yes, I paid a lot for my Harley... and when I sell it, I will get more back than I paid.

I know this is AT, and performance (numbers) is god to the kids here. But some of us have grown up and realize that performance is not everything. Some of us even drive sedans and trucks.
 

markgm

Diamond Member
Aug 23, 2001
3,291
2
81
I see your point loic2003, I'm sure a lot of other riders would agree with you, but I don't know that it's fair to Amused to lump him in with that sterotype. I've had folks on sportbikes not wave as well as folks on Harley's.

I know that if I was riding a Hardley I wouldn't feel safe taking my hand off the bar :evil:. I kid, I kid...