Popular software from the 80s/90s that eventually failed?

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

yhelothar

Lifer
Dec 11, 2002
18,409
39
91
I liked that software. I was using it with my laptop, and a GPS puck for awhile I don't use Windows anymore, and even if I could get it going in Wine, I doubt I could get the GPS working.

Meh it's the worst GPS software I imagine anyone could design.

You can't click on a location and go there. You couldn't double click to zoom, you had to either click on the tiny magnifying glass icon, or right click and click zoom. If you go off route, it won't reroute... it'll just say off-route. You can't go to an address from your location. You always have to type in your current location.
 

foghorn67

Lifer
Jan 3, 2006
11,883
63
91
I liked that software. I was using it with my laptop, and a GPS puck for awhile I don't use Windows anymore, and even if I could get it going in Wine, I doubt I could get the GPS working.

+1. I loved Streets and Trips.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Another Winamp and WinRAR user here.

WinRAR: Better compression and recovery options than ZIP, and I like the interface more than 7zip's. And it can open ISO files, 7zip files, and various other archives.

Winamp: A simple interface, and it just plain works.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,082
136
I still use Streets & Trips on my laptop with GPS. But only for long road trips. Daily driving its not worth the effort.
 

AyashiKaibutsu

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2004
9,306
4
81
Another Winamp and WinRAR user here.

WinRAR: Better compression and recovery options than ZIP, and I like the interface more than 7zip's. And it can open ISO files, 7zip files, and various other archives.

Winamp: A simple interface, and it just plain works.

I stopped using Winrar because it's so rare that I use rars anymore. When I compress stuff, it's usually more to turn millions of files into a couple of hundred files (I have a lot of manga on my computer). Don't really care how good the compression is in that case so I use zips since it's directly supported by windows. The few times I need to extract rars I just use 7zip since it's not always bugging me to buy a license.

I stopped using winamp when they decided to put a browser in their player. I don't need one bloated program to do everything, and the moment a company starts moving in that direction I generally stop using their product. Foobar just works and is incredibly lightweight with a cleaner UI by default.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,552
10,917
126
Foobar just works and is incredibly lightweight with a cleaner UI by default.

And you can give it just about any ui you want. It takes some work, but it'll be absolutely personal, with exactly what you want displayed, where you want it displayed.
 

AyashiKaibutsu

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2004
9,306
4
81
I still use an older version of Nero, it's fast and not bloated.

What's good all around burning software?

I use nero express (it's been a couple of years since I've burned something though). Pissed me off that nero went the bloatware way, but the express version is pretty lightweight at least.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
I stopped using Winrar because it's so rare that I use rars anymore. When I compress stuff, it's usually more to turn millions of files into a couple of hundred files (I have a lot of manga on my computer). Don't really care how good the compression is in that case so I use zips since it's directly supported by windows. The few times I need to extract rars I just use 7zip since it's not always bugging me to buy a license.
I bought WinRAR awhile back, so I don't get the pleading for (more) money. :)
My compression is usually to turn lots of large files into long-term archives. WinRAR's better compression helps with that sort of thing. It's also nice sometimes because having a file as an RAR means that Windows Search won't be taking up lots of time looking through the contents of every compressed archive I have.


I stopped using winamp when they decided to put a browser in their player. I don't need one bloated program to do everything, and the moment a company starts moving in that direction I generally stop using their product. Foobar just works and is incredibly lightweight with a cleaner UI by default.
I didn't even know that was there. I'm still using the Classic interface. The fancy new interface was indeed bloated, and back when I had a non-SSD hard drive, it took longer to load.

I'll have to give Foobar a shot again. I tried it a few years ago, but I don't remember anymore why I opted not to use it.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,552
10,917
126
I still use an older version of Nero, it's fast and not bloated.

What's good all around burning software?

I use Imgburn exclusively for images, and Infrarecorder for everything else. The former is freeware, while the latter is libre.