GaiaHunter
Diamond Member
- Jul 13, 2008
- 3,700
- 406
- 126
I don't exactly remember that number, but actually it's a bit low. Furmark on a 4890 should be a bit more than 133w (166w wall) The VRMs there may be throttling.
166W was for a 4870 (maybe 512MB, doesn't specify). And they were using a 85% efficiency PSU.
Their reference for a 4890 is 268W. Considering their 4870 value I would consider they already applied the efficiency in the numbers, but even if not, it would still be 227W.
Now, I've seen really different numbers - sites like Anandtech and HardOCP put the 4890 only slightly more power hungry than a 4870. Sites like guru3d and techpowerup have the 4890 as quite a bit more power hungry.
Lets say that only draws 160W or 13.3A opposed to 140W or 11.67A. That is only 1.6A more but would throw your hypothetical system consume to 24A.
I don't know what is the combined amperage of the 12V rails, I only have this xclio label and the calculation I can make puts the 12V amperage at 24A.
In my experience, if PSU manufacturers don't say combined 12V amperage it is because it isn't pretty so I wouldn't expect much more than 24A.
If he had a recent PSU with 30A or more, I wouldn't say it could be the PSU - but old PSU and low amperage...
IMO it can be 3 things - Windows fucked up, Video card fucked up or PSU fucked up.
Well, I'm curious as well. It's always been my understanding that a power-starved PC will simply error out, or shut down due to OCP kicking in. But, lately we have this idea floating around that power-starved systems will throttle themselves somehow.
Guess they could do an article about that.
Last edited: