POLL: Would you have "relations" with teens if it wasn't illegal?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Excelsior

Lifer
May 30, 2002
19,047
18
81
Originally posted by: Dezign
Oh, man... :eek:

I don't think I would... it would be against my morals to get freaky with a kid that was still in high school. You have to be 18+ to get into this party. :p

You've just shattered all of my hopes and dreams. :(
 
Mar 15, 2003
12,668
103
106
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
This thread should be renamed: "Application to be a Catholic Priest" or "Let the ATOT community know you have the urge to be a pedophile".

Hey now, pedophilia suggests that you lust after pre-pubescent children.. I forget the correct term but pedophiles don't dig 16 year olds..
 
Mar 15, 2003
12,668
103
106
Originally posted by: Tinkerhell
Link

Let's not label everyone here (well, more than 50% of the people who replied to the poll) perverts... We're not saying that we would act on these feelings or that we even have these feelings.... I'm just curious about the morality of the issue - what's really keeping us guys from picking up chicks from the arcade - deep moral values or laws... (Not judging either way - I voted "MAYBE" myself)
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
This thread should be renamed: "Application to be a Catholic Priest" or "Let the ATOT community know you have the urge to be a pedophile".

Hey now, pedophilia suggests that you lust after pre-pubescent children.. I forget the correct term but pedophiles don't dig 16 year olds..
Last I checked, pedophiles lusted after 13/14/15 too... which could still be defined as pre-pubescent... and you only said "teens" not 16 and 17 year olds or just 17 year olds...

 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
Depends on both parties levels of maturity. Just because someone was born first doesn't make them mentally and emotionally superior.

 
Mar 15, 2003
12,668
103
106
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
This thread should be renamed: "Application to be a Catholic Priest" or "Let the ATOT community know you have the urge to be a pedophile".

Hey now, pedophilia suggests that you lust after pre-pubescent children.. I forget the correct term but pedophiles don't dig 16 year olds..
Last I checked, pedophiles lusted after 13/14/15 too... which could still be defined as pre-pubescent... and you only said "teens" not 16 and 17 year olds or just 17 year olds...

Yeah, yeah.. Typical ATOT nitpicking.. I'll just end it... bye..
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
This thread should be renamed: "Application to be a Catholic Priest" or "Let the ATOT community know you have the urge to be a pedophile".

Hey now, pedophilia suggests that you lust after pre-pubescent children.. I forget the correct term but pedophiles don't dig 16 year olds..
Last I checked, pedophiles lusted after 13/14/15 too... which could still be defined as pre-pubescent... and you only said "teens" not 16 and 17 year olds or just 17 year olds...

Yeah, yeah.. Typical ATOT nitpicking.. I'll just end it... bye..
Yes it was some nitpicking. :) Would you honestly say that you would go for a hot 13 or 14 y/o? I think maybe 17, 16 would REALLY be pushing it. But maybe you could change thread title to 16, you'd probably get alot more "Hell yeah's".

 

katka

Senior member
Jun 19, 2001
708
0
0
Most men would that is why there is a law in place.

From Mary Kay Letourneau it is obvious that some women would, but in general most women would not as they tend to choose men for "security".

Me, no I would not molest someone's child. I HATE dating outside of my age group as I find that I have nothing in common with much younger or older men. I once dated a guy who was 3 years younger (he was legal with a body to die for 1% body fat :D ), but I had feelings of guilt and had to end it. I just could not get over the psychological block (have a younger brother, 5 years could have been little brother's friend or something). He was pretty hot looking and agreeable though. :D
 

Encryptic

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
8,885
0
0
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
This thread should be renamed: "Application to be a Catholic Priest" or "Let the ATOT community know you have the urge to be a pedophile".

Hey now, pedophilia suggests that you lust after pre-pubescent children.. I forget the correct term but pedophiles don't dig 16 year olds..
Last I checked, pedophiles lusted after 13/14/15 too... which could still be defined as pre-pubescent... and you only said "teens" not 16 and 17 year olds or just 17 year olds...

Yeah, yeah.. Typical ATOT nitpicking.. I'll just end it... bye..
Yes it was some nitpicking. :) Would you honestly say that you would go for a hot 13 or 14 y/o? I think maybe 17, 16 would REALLY be pushing it. But maybe you could change thread title to 16, you'd probably get alot more "Hell yeah's".

"Old enough to pee, old enough for me!"

"There's grass on the field, play ball!"

:D
 
Mar 15, 2003
12,668
103
106
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
This thread should be renamed: "Application to be a Catholic Priest" or "Let the ATOT community know you have the urge to be a pedophile".

Hey now, pedophilia suggests that you lust after pre-pubescent children.. I forget the correct term but pedophiles don't dig 16 year olds..
Last I checked, pedophiles lusted after 13/14/15 too... which could still be defined as pre-pubescent... and you only said "teens" not 16 and 17 year olds or just 17 year olds...

Yeah, yeah.. Typical ATOT nitpicking.. I'll just end it... bye..
Yes it was some nitpicking. :) Would you honestly say that you would go for a hot 13 or 14 y/o? I think maybe 17, 16 would REALLY be pushing it. But maybe you could change thread title to 16, you'd probably get alot more "Hell yeah's".

I want the voters to decide in their own mind what would be too young or not.. But I don't want to add too many conditional clauses..It's a vague question, I agree.. . Makes for a better discussion that way ;)
 

Ness

Diamond Member
Jul 10, 2002
5,407
2
0
I'd base things more of mental maturity than physical maturity. Having relations with a 17 year old that is fully matured (physically and mentally) is acceptable in my eyes. Also, I define "relations" as "a commited relationship".

But you DO have to weigh in the fact that when you are 20+ there is still that age barrier that could put a serious dent in a relationship, and it would be very taxing on someone in high school or such to have to deal with that. So, while I think it's acceptable with many well-defined standards, it's probably not a good idea.


Hell, there are 20+ year olds that act like they are 12 that I wouldn't touch for that reason.
 

KnickNut3

Platinum Member
Oct 1, 2001
2,382
0
0
I think laws shape morals too much for this poll to have any bearing. Too many people wiill think, conciously or subconciously, that since something is against the law, it's wrong, and one shouldn't be assosiated with it.

Also, people are afraid of what others will think.
 
Mar 15, 2003
12,668
103
106
Originally posted by: KnickNut3
I think laws shape morals too much for this poll to have any bearing. Too many people wiill think, conciously or subconciously, that since something is against the law, it's wrong, and one shouldn't be assosiated with it.

Also, people are afraid of what others will think.

I agree with you.. This is obviously not a scientific poll - just something to think about.. I do feel that the question has struck a nerve with some people but the conversations thus far has been pretty balanced and thoughtful...
 

DT4K

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2002
6,944
3
81
In reality, is there any physical, psychological, or emotional differrence between the day before turning 18 and the day after turning 18?
Of course not.
So I assume if someone was ok with being with an 18 year old, they would also be ok with being with a 17.5 year old if there was no law against it.
It's all very subjective.

Personally, I think there are plenty of 16 and 17 year olds who are just as mature and responsible as some 20 year olds.
I was 19 when I started going out with a 16 year old. She was one of my friend's little sisters.
Was it illegal? yes.
Do I regret it? of course not, we got married 4 years later in 1994 and have 3 kids now with our fourth on the way.

But for the purposes of the law, an arbitrary age had to be picked and it happened to be 18 (at least in most states). Should it be lower? should it be higher? I'm sure everyone has their own opinion.
 

shimsham

Lifer
May 9, 2002
10,765
0
0
you forgot the option:

grown women are crazy enough, why would i want go younger when they are even more crazy?

if youre 19+ and still dating girls in high school, its time to get a life;)
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
Originally posted by: Dezign
Oh, man... :eek:

I don't think I would... it would be against my morals to get freaky with a kid that was still in high school. You have to be 18+ to get into this party. :p

Umm, not to get picky, but aren't you involved with someone that has only been out of high school for less than a year?
 

DOSfan

Senior member
Sep 19, 2003
522
0
0
Here is the problem with this idea:

1) Physical age, in and of itself, means absolute crap.
2) Mental maturity is subjective. It relies on experience. How can you be experienced, if you are not allowed to experience? How do I get a job without experience, when I can not get experience without a job?

The law is in place primarily due to "other peoples" morals. What I mean by this is, when the laws were writen it was by people that had different ideas on what what acceptable - and different needs. (Most of the age of consent laws were based on ideals when lifespans were shorter, and we were not as "civilized" as we are now. I wouldn't call us civilized now..........)

So I do not feel the law applies appropriatly at this time.

But then again, with the mental maturation of most of the women I know...... The age of consent laws should be about 30+. :(

Before I get flamed for sexism, I would like to point out that I do not know, or care, about the men I know. The same could be true for us males. I do not care. :p