Originally posted by: Dezign
Oh, man...
I don't think I would... it would be against my morals to get freaky with a kid that was still in high school. You have to be 18+ to get into this party.![]()
You've just shattered all of my hopes and dreams.
Originally posted by: Dezign
Oh, man...
I don't think I would... it would be against my morals to get freaky with a kid that was still in high school. You have to be 18+ to get into this party.![]()
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
This thread should be renamed: "Application to be a Catholic Priest" or "Let the ATOT community know you have the urge to be a pedophile".
Originally posted by: Tinkerhell
Link
Last I checked, pedophiles lusted after 13/14/15 too... which could still be defined as pre-pubescent... and you only said "teens" not 16 and 17 year olds or just 17 year olds...Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
This thread should be renamed: "Application to be a Catholic Priest" or "Let the ATOT community know you have the urge to be a pedophile".
Hey now, pedophilia suggests that you lust after pre-pubescent children.. I forget the correct term but pedophiles don't dig 16 year olds..
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Last I checked, pedophiles lusted after 13/14/15 too... which could still be defined as pre-pubescent... and you only said "teens" not 16 and 17 year olds or just 17 year olds...Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
This thread should be renamed: "Application to be a Catholic Priest" or "Let the ATOT community know you have the urge to be a pedophile".
Hey now, pedophilia suggests that you lust after pre-pubescent children.. I forget the correct term but pedophiles don't dig 16 year olds..
Yes it was some nitpicking.Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Last I checked, pedophiles lusted after 13/14/15 too... which could still be defined as pre-pubescent... and you only said "teens" not 16 and 17 year olds or just 17 year olds...Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
This thread should be renamed: "Application to be a Catholic Priest" or "Let the ATOT community know you have the urge to be a pedophile".
Hey now, pedophilia suggests that you lust after pre-pubescent children.. I forget the correct term but pedophiles don't dig 16 year olds..
Yeah, yeah.. Typical ATOT nitpicking.. I'll just end it... bye..
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Yes it was some nitpicking.Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Last I checked, pedophiles lusted after 13/14/15 too... which could still be defined as pre-pubescent... and you only said "teens" not 16 and 17 year olds or just 17 year olds...Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
This thread should be renamed: "Application to be a Catholic Priest" or "Let the ATOT community know you have the urge to be a pedophile".
Hey now, pedophilia suggests that you lust after pre-pubescent children.. I forget the correct term but pedophiles don't dig 16 year olds..
Yeah, yeah.. Typical ATOT nitpicking.. I'll just end it... bye..Would you honestly say that you would go for a hot 13 or 14 y/o? I think maybe 17, 16 would REALLY be pushing it. But maybe you could change thread title to 16, you'd probably get alot more "Hell yeah's".
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Yes it was some nitpicking.Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Last I checked, pedophiles lusted after 13/14/15 too... which could still be defined as pre-pubescent... and you only said "teens" not 16 and 17 year olds or just 17 year olds...Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
This thread should be renamed: "Application to be a Catholic Priest" or "Let the ATOT community know you have the urge to be a pedophile".
Hey now, pedophilia suggests that you lust after pre-pubescent children.. I forget the correct term but pedophiles don't dig 16 year olds..
Yeah, yeah.. Typical ATOT nitpicking.. I'll just end it... bye..Would you honestly say that you would go for a hot 13 or 14 y/o? I think maybe 17, 16 would REALLY be pushing it. But maybe you could change thread title to 16, you'd probably get alot more "Hell yeah's".
Originally posted by: KnickNut3
I think laws shape morals too much for this poll to have any bearing. Too many people wiill think, conciously or subconciously, that since something is against the law, it's wrong, and one shouldn't be assosiated with it.
Also, people are afraid of what others will think.
As a matter of fact: yes.Originally posted by: Red Dawn
No way, what do you think I am, some drunken Fratboy??
Originally posted by: Dezign
Oh, man...
I don't think I would... it would be against my morals to get freaky with a kid that was still in high school. You have to be 18+ to get into this party.![]()
