AnitaPeterson
Diamond Member
- Apr 24, 2001
- 5,990
- 491
- 126
Originally posted by: Chumpman
venus because it rhymes with penis :0
Originally posted by: matt426malm
Originally posted by: Bootprint
Originally posted by: AnitaPeterson
a couple of observations... Mercury has one side facing the Sun, perpetually... that reduces the available surface...
Funny how Soviets/Russians were more "into" Venus, and the U.S. more "into" Mars....... The asteroid belt will be a hot spot for the industry, since so many elements are available there. So it's logical to assume the connection with Earth will be through either a large Jovian satellite or Mars. In any case, Mars is the most feasible overall, and it has the psychological advantage of having been known by everyone.
It seems from here, Mercury isn't tidal locked with one face always towards the sun.
the period of the orbit is 88 days, while the period of
Mercury's rotation is 59 days. That is sort of locked
Huhhuhhh.. he said penis.Originally posted by: Kyteland
Originally posted by: Chumpman
venus because it rhymes with penis :0
Mars rhymes with SARS. What's your point?
Originally posted by: Gr1mL0cK
I think Mars is super cute but not when she transforms. Mercury is super cute both way though.
Originally posted by: matt426malm
Originally posted by: LordMagnusKain
Originally posted by: matt426malm
Originally posted by: LordMagnusKain
Originally posted by: TheAudit
Originally posted by: Spoooon
Venus probe info.
Thanks for the link!
"The hardy spacecraft had delivered the first measurements conducted directly on the surface of another planet. The data confirmed what has already been speculated about the "weather" on Venus -- the surface temperature was 460 to 475 degrees Fahrenheit (237 to 246 degrees Celsius) -- enough to melt such metals as lead or zinc. The atmospheric pressure at the surface turned out to be around 93 atmospheres, comparable to an ocean depth on Earth of around 2,625 feet (800 meters)."
temp and pressure all within do-able limits for application specific bio-spheres.
but mars is sooooo much easier, venus is do-able when 100 years off? We could colonize mars now.
well, our life time for tera-forming... we'd have it going well now if they'd implemented Carol Sagan's suggestions back in the 70s.
I'm going to stick with Zubrin "The Case for Mars" he is the best space colonization author. Sagan is a bit out of his element with colonization, I see him as more of a spokesman for science in general.
Originally posted by: dtyn
1 vote for Dantooine...in KotOR it had a pretty layout...better than any of the other planets in our solar system.
Ugh, Star Wars....Originally posted by: dtyn
1 vote for Dantooine...in KotOR it had a pretty layout...better than any of the other planets in our solar system.
Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1
If you mean by a civilized, intelligent, peaceful race then I'd choose Earth.
If you mean by Humans, why do we need to find a new place when we aren't done destroying this one yet?
Originally posted by: lobbyone
i was thinking one of the moons of jupiter...which one was it?!
Originally posted by: Kyteland
I'm very surprised that there is no plan to colonize mars, especially after "A Case for Mars" was published. We could establish a base on Mars relatively cheaply, and if some entrepreneurial companies got on board they could stand to make a lot of $$ from it.