shortylickens
No Lifer
- Jul 15, 2003
- 80,287
- 17,082
- 136
Also, the most intelligent thing ever said on the subject was covered over 10 years ago and has not been improved since then.
www.perkel.com ->sex
www.perkel.com ->sex
It's a bet you'd lose, but I doubt there is anyway I can convince you of that. I've dated and had sex with a total of one woman, which is my wife (a fact of which I'm sure more than a few of you just snickered at). I choose a long time ago that I was going to wait until I had a meaningful relationship established before having sex.
I don't really think pornography is a good thing, but I see it as operating on a different level than prostitution. It's also merely an attempt to divert attention and refute my position with something that is similar, but ultimately totally different. You aren't addressing my main point, but talking in circles around it.
I'm saying that there is no justification for the establishment of the apparatuses of taxation for this "profession".
They should both be criminized & policed equally to the maximum extent possible. This is also why polygamy remains illegal today.
Polygamy is illegal because, again due to genetics, women tend to look for "providers" or someone that can provide for her and their offspring. That means that the rich dudes get all the womens. It is also not a good thing in the long run, again due to genetics (much better to "spread them around").
Lets assume you are being completely honest, 95% of the other men in this nation have "paid" for sex in one way or another. Hell, most men will give their wives gifts JUST to get some or something extra. You do realize that most of this is hardwired in our brains right? Just because you have been sexually deprived doesn't mean everyone should, especially when it goes against our most basic of instincts.
You aren't really making your point very well. You are the extreme minority.
The difference is one has a camera present while people are paid to have sex and the other doesn't. That just doesn't rank in the "totally different" category in my book. It is actually almost exactly the same in Darwin's book'o'rankings. The women "actors" financially benefit far more than the male "actors". All of that aside though, the really relevant part of Darwin's book'o'rankings is that they are paid to have sex .
Bottom line: People have been fucking since the beginning of people. People really like fucking. People will be paying to fuck long after you and I are gone. Forcing it underground makes it unsafer and worse for the participants, especially the women. So you are stopping nothing by advocating that it remain illegal and hindering any attempt to improve the situation.
"I don't support legalization, but it should be handled on a state by state basis, just like abortion should be."
- wolf
Damn that's dishonest... stripping the context to make it seem like that was a statement of wolf's own opinion instead of a quote of a position he was postulating a hypothetical politician might toss to the press.Damn that's harsh... comparing pot to abortions. I guess taking away rights is what you people stand for. Boooo....woolfe9999 said:"I don't support legalization, but it should be handled on a state by state basis, just like abortion should be."
- wolf
Polygamy is illegal because, again due to genetics, women tend to look for "providers" or someone that can provide for her and their offspring. That means that the rich dudes get all the womens. It is also not a good thing in the long run, again due to genetics (much better to "spread them around").
Wonder if the Bunny Ranch files taxes? Something tells me they do.
Well if you have legalized prostitution who is going to protect the public from the spread of STD's. That could be aids, VD, Herpes, etc. Prostitution could increase aids proliferation. Not to mention that women could be treated like a commodity and be abused and mistreated. Do you think that your sister or daughter would make a nice prostitute?
It could be possible to have legal prostitution. But would it imporve society or be bad for society. I was looking at some info on South Korea. At one point Prostitution represented 1.5% of their gross domestic product. So would women have contracts that bar owners would buy and sell?
Criminalizing prostitution doesn't have all that significant an effect on how much high risk sex occurs in society. All it does is make one segment of it much more dangerous.Well if you have legalized prostitution who is going to protect the public from the spread of STD's. That could be aids, VD, Herpes, etc. Prostitution could increase aids proliferation. Not to mention that women could be treated like a commodity and be abused and mistreated. Do you think that your sister or daughter would make a nice prostitute?
Well if you have legalized prostitution who is going to protect the public from the spread of STD's. That could be aids, VD, Herpes, etc. Prostitution could increase aids proliferation. Not to mention that women could be treated like a commodity and be abused and mistreated. Do you think that your sister or daughter would make a nice prostitute?
It could be possible to have legal prostitution. But would it imporve society or be bad for society. I was looking at some info on South Korea. At one point Prostitution represented 1.5% of their gross domestic product. So would women have contracts that bar owners would buy and sell?
