I think many of you are pulling way much more into this decision than is essential. This is a case of the restriction of a basic personal freedom. Thats it. Drinking and driving is a completely different issue. It will still be wrong, and it will still be illegal - no matter how old you are, a DUI is a DUI. It doesnt matter that *perhaps* alchohol related deaths will increase - there has always been a price to pay for freedom. And frankly, I don't give a SHlT if some guy I never met drinks too much and wraps himself around a telephone poll. The government is not going to be able to tell this guy not to drink and drive... they have been trying forever. But you know who will? That guy's friends and family - the real people in control of one's moral education. Ok back to the point. Im a firm believer that what someone doesnt know cant hurt them. More specifically, if I can do something and no one else is either aware or affected by it, it should not be restricted in any manner, no matter how dangerous it has the potential to be to myself or others. Drinking a beer, smoking a joint, whackin it, owning (carrying) a gun, cutting my fingernails etc. all fall into this category as well as many other personal freedoms we take for granted. For the record, i drink occasionally, dont smoke pot, whack it... well thats none of your business, would never consider owning a gun, and dont cut my fingernails (i bite them - nasty habit). Just because I think owning a gun is an invitation for disaster (it is afterall an instrument designed for the sole purpose of killing), does not mean I dont think people should own guns. It means I think people should use guns responsibly and suffer the consequences of their irresponsibility. Okay, enough for now.
"Sin lies only in hurting others unnecessarily. All other "sins" are
invented nonsense."
-- Robert Heinlein