POLL: Is Kwanzaa a real holiday?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: jpeyton
As real as the sham we call commercialized Christmas.

How is Christmas a sham? We all know it's commercialized, and that's the way we like it. Christmas wasn't made up in the 60's by civil rights radicals AFAIK.

Christmas for a majority of Americans is no longer celebrated as the birth of Christ. The meaning of Christmas has been continually de-emphasized while the spirit of Christmas has slowly evolved into a present exchange.

Why not just buy gifts for loved ones whenever you feel the urge?

I have no doubt that Christmas is a real holiday. The sham is how we have interpreted it. Christmas ranks right up there with Valentine's Day as far as legitimate holidays go.
 

MacBaine

Banned
Aug 23, 2001
9,999
0
0
Originally posted by: sandorski
If people celebrate it, then it is a Holiday. Perhaps it isn't a sanctioned Holiday, but that will change if people continue to celebrate it and if it becomes popular enough.

Actually, I believe Clinton sanctioned it a few years back.

Its popularity has nothing to do with its essence. If the grand wizard of the KKK started a holiday to celebrate white culture, and his slogan was "Think white, act white, talk white, etc", I'm sure people wouldn't be so accepting of it. Yet because Kwanzaa is black, we must be accepting of it or we are racists, despite its founder's history.
 

illustri

Golden Member
Mar 14, 2001
1,490
0
0
macbaine, by the very namesake christmas was meant to separate christians from NON-christians you think the buddhist celebrated christmas right when it was first created?

today, it is all inclusive ONLY because it has become so secular, inclusive, "x-mas", dickens and irving made the christmas you know today, santa claus albiet derived from saint nicholas is as religious as jolly rancher now

besides i dont understand why a holiday's legitimacy should be based on its inclusiveness, is yom kippur so inclusive?
 

illustri

Golden Member
Mar 14, 2001
1,490
0
0
[qI'm sure by then, the story of Kwanzaa will be as heavily diluted and misconstrued as the settling of America is now[/quote]

i think you just also described christmas, and i totally agree with you
and if you're asking why im bring xmas up so often its because history channels been doing this freaking chain love of specials on it, of course im fascinated as a non-christian to learn other practices

it also isnt the sole crutch of my argument, but its a good counter, no.. parallel example
 

MacBaine

Banned
Aug 23, 2001
9,999
0
0
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: jpeyton
As real as the sham we call commercialized Christmas.

How is Christmas a sham? We all know it's commercialized, and that's the way we like it. Christmas wasn't made up in the 60's by civil rights radicals AFAIK.

Christmas for a majority of Americans is no longer celebrated as the birth of Christ.

So? It was never solely celebrated as the birth of Christ in the first place. As was said... Christmas is the culmination of several cultural practices and traditions. The fact that some people celebrate it in different ways than others lends to this fact. It is now more generally recognized (though not realized) and celebrated with it's original intention, as a celebration in which we can all enjoy the season and each other, however we may choose.

The meaning of Christmas has been continually de-emphasized while the spirit of Christmas has slowly evolved into a present exchange.

The spirit of Christmas is whatever you may make of it. The meaning of Christmas is whatever you may make of it. As I said, it was not originally celebrated as the birth of Christ... so one could argue that the meaning of Christmas is slowely being re-emphasized. The exchanging of presents is a century old tradition, which has naturally been assimilated by modern culture to boost retail sales. The loss of the 'Christmas spirit' has everything to do with your outlook on Christmas and how you choose to spend it.

Why not just buy gifts for loved ones whenever you feel the urge?

Go for it... nobody is stopping you. People enjoy the tradition of exchanging presents on Christmas.

I have no doubt that Christmas is a real holiday. The sham is how we have interpreted it. Christmas ranks right up there with Valentine's Day as far as legitimate holidays go.

I will not comment on valentine's day... I will make that thread when the time comes. Christmas is by far, however, in a completely different category from VD

 

Siddhartha

Lifer
Oct 17, 1999
12,505
3
81
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Ok..who voted yes.

Some people have been brave enough to state their position...

I would really like to hear why people think it should be considered a real holiday. I may sound completely biased, but so far I haven't heard any good arguments for it.

I am not a Christian, Christmas is no more legitimate than any other holiday including Kwanzaa.




 

MacBaine

Banned
Aug 23, 2001
9,999
0
0
Originally posted by: illustri
macbaine, by the very namesake christmas was meant to separate christians from NON-christians you think the buddhist celebrated christmas right when it was first created?

today, it is all inclusive ONLY because it has become so secular, inclusive, "x-mas", dickens and irving made the christmas you know today, santa claus albiet derived from saint nicholas is as religious as jolly rancher now

besides i dont understand why a holiday's legitimacy should be based on its inclusiveness, is yom kippur so inclusive?

Comparing Kwanzaa to other religiously inclusive holidays is not a fair comparison, as Kwanzaa is not religious. It is a racial holiday, which was founded by radicals to seperate their culture from others. There really isnt any other holiday which you can compare it to fairly.

Christmas is in no way a fair comparison, because as has been stated, it is a culmination of so many cultural traditions, beliefs, and customs, that it is by nature all inclusive. Kwanzaa is by nature, exclusive, meant to provide racial isolation.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,770
6,336
126
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: sandorski
If people celebrate it, then it is a Holiday. Perhaps it isn't a sanctioned Holiday, but that will change if people continue to celebrate it and if it becomes popular enough.

Actually, I believe Clinton sanctioned it a few years back.

Its popularity has nothing to do with its essence. If the grand wizard of the KKK started a holiday to celebrate white culture, and his slogan was "Think white, act white, talk white, etc", I'm sure people wouldn't be so accepting of it. Yet because Kwanzaa is black, we must be accepting of it or we are racists, despite its founder's history.

The KKK has a history of trying to Oppress, Kwanzanites(made that up) don't. So the slogan for the Kwanzanites has a totally different meaning and different goal than what the KKKs parallel.

You're making a mountain out of a molehill.
 

MacBaine

Banned
Aug 23, 2001
9,999
0
0
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Ok..who voted yes.

Some people have been brave enough to state their position...

I would really like to hear why people think it should be considered a real holiday. I may sound completely biased, but so far I haven't heard any good arguments for it.

I am not a Christian, Christmas is no more legitimate than any other holiday including Kwanzaa.

I'm not Christian either. Care to explain your stance?
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Well if I can find a Christian who thinks your version of Christmas is a sham, I guess that would only justify your stance on Kwanzaa.

So far you have explained your ideas on what does NOT constitute a real holiday. How about a quick numbered list of what prerequisites a "real" holiday needs.
 

MacBaine

Banned
Aug 23, 2001
9,999
0
0
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: sandorski
If people celebrate it, then it is a Holiday. Perhaps it isn't a sanctioned Holiday, but that will change if people continue to celebrate it and if it becomes popular enough.

Actually, I believe Clinton sanctioned it a few years back.

Its popularity has nothing to do with its essence. If the grand wizard of the KKK started a holiday to celebrate white culture, and his slogan was "Think white, act white, talk white, etc", I'm sure people wouldn't be so accepting of it. Yet because Kwanzaa is black, we must be accepting of it or we are racists, despite its founder's history.

The KKK has a history of trying to Oppress, Kwanzanites(made that up) don't. So the slogan for the Kwanzanites has a totally different meaning and different goal than what the KKKs parallel.

You're making a mountain out of a molehill.

The black radical groups of the 60's, Kwanzaa's creator being a prominent leader of one of them, have a history of trying to advance their race through violence and racial isolation. While I realize that the two groups are different, the underlying themes of racial inequality and seperation are present in both.
 

Sid59

Lifer
Sep 2, 2002
11,879
3
81
The matter with that is for the reasons I have stated thus far. It was established with the intention of providing a holiday to seperate blacks from whites. Christmas has never had such intentions, and is meant as a time for everybody to enjoy the season. Christmas is completely race-free, while Kwanzaa is exclusively black

The birth of Christ was race free? I gotta look up the people who celebrated the birth of Christ. Maybe im thinking it's a religious thing.

Christmas is no longer celebrated as teh birth of Christ. it's a testatment about giving and loving. "bringing family together and having good times"

"Kwanzaa is exclusively black"
I don't know where you live but in California, the Bay Area and specifically in the community i work in, Berkeley, Kwanzaa is not just a Black thing. It brings the community together. Whites, Blacks, Latinos, and Asians.
If Kwanazaa wants to reach the Christmas status of giving and loving and "brining family together and having good times" then people need to adopt things.

Hanukkah brings family together and having good times. Is it a holiday? Isn't it exclusicvely a Jewish holiday? Granted that Hanukkah prolly wasn't founded by some "seperatist" looking for ways to segregrate Jews and Christians but it's still a holiday.

All ethnicities have their own holidays. Are you trying to say that the holiday they want to find positivity in is no good?

in which the founder of Kwanzaa stated in his own book, that blacks should "think black, talk black, act black, create black, buy black, vote black, and live black,"

Did you read the book or are you just pulling quotes out to fill your arguement? Do you know the reason he said such a thing? I don't but i would be interesting in checking the book out at the library and reading more on in. Because it's posted on the net, doesn't mean it has reveleance.

how much credibility does that first quote have?

...detailed in The Quotable Karenga, authored by Karenga himself. "The sevenfold path of blackness is think black, talk black,
act black, create black, buy black, vote black, and live black," the book states.


he psychiatrist's report stated, "This man now represents a picture which can be considered both paranoid and schizophrenic with hallucinations and elusions, inappropriate affect, disorganization, and impaired contact with the environment." The psychiatrist observed that Karenga talked to his blanket and imaginary persons and believed that he had been attacked by dive-bombers.

so a person who was diagnosed with paranoia an schizophrenia is the same person you're gonna blame? You are attacking his credibility of starting Kwanazaa but you didn't mention he was a paradnoid schizo? - all from the link you posted.


Kwanzaa - KWANZAA is derived from the Swahili word, KWANZA which means first fruits. -- objections to this definition?
KWANZAA "as a holiday of the first fruits" comes directly out of the traditoin of agricultural people of Africa, who celebrated and gave thanks for harvest at designated times during the year.
Each tribe or community in Africa would come together to sing, dance, eat and drink and celebrate the harvest of the first fruits and vegetables. The would bring food they grew or items they made to give to the feast.


so .. Kwanzaa, on it's own, the way it stands in ORIGIN, was not not founded by Dr. Maulana Karenga. He gets credit for adapting it from Africa to fit the African Americans of the 60s-70s. --- whats the problem with that?


Again you have problem with the person who adopted the festivities of Kwanzaa with African Americans with the "INTENDED PURPOSE OF CELEBRATING AND ENJOY KWANZAA"
 

illustri

Golden Member
Mar 14, 2001
1,490
0
0
i think the comparison is valid and inclusiveness of the secular christmas came only after long period of dilution and misconstruction of its original meaning, give kwanzaa enough time and it'll follow suit

 

MacBaine

Banned
Aug 23, 2001
9,999
0
0
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Well if I can find a Christian who thinks your version of Christmas is a sham, I guess that would only justify your stance on Kwanzaa.

So far you have explained your ideas on what does NOT constitute a real holiday. How about a quick numbered list of what prerequisites a "real" holiday needs.

Being able to state my opinion on what should not be a holiday does not require that I am able to produce a definition of what should be a holiday. There are countless reasons for a holiday to exist. There are also countless reasons that a holiday should NOT exist for. This is one of the latter.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,770
6,336
126
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: sandorski
If people celebrate it, then it is a Holiday. Perhaps it isn't a sanctioned Holiday, but that will change if people continue to celebrate it and if it becomes popular enough.

Actually, I believe Clinton sanctioned it a few years back.

Its popularity has nothing to do with its essence. If the grand wizard of the KKK started a holiday to celebrate white culture, and his slogan was "Think white, act white, talk white, etc", I'm sure people wouldn't be so accepting of it. Yet because Kwanzaa is black, we must be accepting of it or we are racists, despite its founder's history.

The KKK has a history of trying to Oppress, Kwanzanites(made that up) don't. So the slogan for the Kwanzanites has a totally different meaning and different goal than what the KKKs parallel.

You're making a mountain out of a molehill.

The black radical groups of the 60's, Kwanzaa's creator being a prominent leader of one of them, have a history of trying to advance their race through violence and racial isolation. While I realize that the two groups are different, the underlying themes of racial inequality and seperation are present in both.

That doesn't address the main difference:

1) the KKK is/was an attempt to Oppress a race of peoples, the result of another people(those who they would like to Oppress) gaining their Freedom.
2) the various groups created around the time of MLK and the Civil Rights movement were attempting to realize the Rights and Equality that had been granted to them some 100 years before.

Are you sympathetic to the cause of the KKK?
 

illustri

Golden Member
Mar 14, 2001
1,490
0
0
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Well if I can find a Christian who thinks your version of Christmas is a sham, I guess that would only justify your stance on Kwanzaa.

So far you have explained your ideas on what does NOT constitute a real holiday. How about a quick numbered list of what prerequisites a "real" holiday needs.

Being able to state my opinion on what should not be a holiday does not require that I am able to produce a definition of what should be a holiday. There are countless reasons for a holiday to exist. There are also countless reasons that a holiday should NOT exist for. This is one of the latter.

dude you are arguing from a really negative stance, by which i mean not bad necessarily, but logically negative (wtf?)
meaning you come with an opinion that kwanzaa is deficit on the requirements of a holiday and expect us to fill that void to push it into credibility -- well unless anyone here ACTUALLY celebrates kwanzaa you're outa luck

i would personally keep my philisophy to live and let live, applicable to holidays as well as the freedom to believe whatever you want as long as i'm allowed the same
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Well if I can find a Christian who thinks your version of Christmas is a sham, I guess that would only justify your stance on Kwanzaa.

So far you have explained your ideas on what does NOT constitute a real holiday. How about a quick numbered list of what prerequisites a "real" holiday needs.

Being able to state my opinion on what should not be a holiday does not require that I am able to produce a definition of what should be a holiday. There are countless reasons for a holiday to exist. There are also countless reasons that a holiday should NOT exist for. This is one of the latter.

I'm sorry I thought you had an interesting argument for Kwanzaa not being a "real" holiday. Nice cop out though.
 

MacBaine

Banned
Aug 23, 2001
9,999
0
0
Originally posted by: Sid59
The matter with that is for the reasons I have stated thus far. It was established with the intention of providing a holiday to seperate blacks from whites. Christmas has never had such intentions, and is meant as a time for everybody to enjoy the season. Christmas is completely race-free, while Kwanzaa is exclusively black

The birth of Christ was race free? I gotta look up the people who celebrated the birth of Christ. Maybe im thinking it's a religious thing.

Christmas doesn't have tags on it that says "White's only", whereas Kwanzaa is described as "an African American and Pan-African holiday" (taken from the official Kwanzaa website - said by the founder)

Christmas is no longer celebrated as teh birth of Christ. it's a testatment about giving and loving. "bringing family together and having good times"

"Kwanzaa is exclusively black"
I don't know where you live but in California, the Bay Area and specifically in the community i work in, Berkeley, Kwanzaa is not just a Black thing. It brings the community together. Whites, Blacks, Latinos, and Asians.

No offense, but CA is completely different from the rest of the world. Not saying that it is a bad thing... I did not know that Kwanzaa was celebrated this way, your point is taken.

If Kwanazaa wants to reach the Christmas status of giving and loving and "brining family together and having good times" then people need to adopt things.

The problem is, that Christmas already exists for this reason. If the goal of Kwanzaa is to reach the level of Christmas, then what other point is there in creating it than to provide a holiday which is for lack of a better term, black? The way Kwanzaa is portrayed everywhere in society these days is as a black holiday, because that is the principal upon which it was founded

Hanukkah brings family together and having good times. Is it a holiday? Isn't it exclusicvely a Jewish holiday? Granted that Hanukkah prolly wasn't founded by some "seperatist" looking for ways to segregrate Jews and Christians but it's still a holiday.

As I said earlier, it is unfair to compare Kwanzaa to most religious holidays such as Chanuka, as Kwanzaa is not a religious holiday.

All ethnicities have their own holidays. Are you trying to say that the holiday they want to find positivity in is no good?

I am not disagreeing with the existance of a black holiday, this is not at all about racism, On the contrary, I feel that the circumstaces of its creation and nature are out of line, for lack of a better term.

in which the founder of Kwanzaa stated in his own book, that blacks should "think black, talk black, act black, create black, buy black, vote black, and live black,"

Did you read the book or are you just pulling quotes out to fill your arguement? Do you know the reason he said such a thing? I don't but i would be interesting in checking the book out at the library and reading more on in. Because it's posted on the net, doesn't mean it has reveleance.

how much credibility does that first quote have?

That was a quotation made by the founder of Kwanzaa while he was the leader of a black national group which aimed to free blacks from white oppression by embracing their own culture and shutting out white influence.


...detailed in The Quotable Karenga, authored by Karenga himself. "The sevenfold path of blackness is think black, talk black,
act black, create black, buy black, vote black, and live black," the book states.


he psychiatrist's report stated, "This man now represents a picture which can be considered both paranoid and schizophrenic with hallucinations and elusions, inappropriate affect, disorganization, and impaired contact with the environment." The psychiatrist observed that Karenga talked to his blanket and imaginary persons and believed that he had been attacked by dive-bombers.

so a person who was diagnosed with paranoia an schizophrenia is the same person you're gonna blame? You are attacking his credibility of starting Kwanazaa but you didn't mention he was a paradnoid schizo? - all from the link you posted.

He was diagnosed with these conditions after he had created the holiday, when he was on trial for involvement in the shooting deaths of 2 Black Panthers by his US organizations

Kwanzaa - KWANZAA is derived from the Swahili word, KWANZA which means first fruits. -- objections to this definition?
KWANZAA "as a holiday of the first fruits" comes directly out of the traditoin of agricultural people of Africa, who celebrated and gave thanks for harvest at designated times during the year.
Each tribe or community in Africa would come together to sing, dance, eat and drink and celebrate the harvest of the first fruits and vegetables. The would bring food they grew or items they made to give to the feast.


so .. Kwanzaa, on it's own, the way it stands in ORIGIN, was not not founded by Dr. Maulana Karenga. He gets credit for adapting it from Africa to fit the African Americans of the 60s-70s. --- whats the problem with that?

His motives for taking this custom and adapting it to American black culture are what are being questioned. If this were simply a case of adapting a cultural tradition, that would be perfectly fine, however it is obvious that this is not the case

Again you have problem with the person who adopted the festivities of Kwanzaa with African Americans with the "INTENDED PURPOSE OF CELEBRATING AND ENJOY KWANZAA"

I would not have a problem with the holiday if it did not so blatantly stand for racial isolation. That's my opinion on the matter

 

MacBaine

Banned
Aug 23, 2001
9,999
0
0
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: sandorski
If people celebrate it, then it is a Holiday. Perhaps it isn't a sanctioned Holiday, but that will change if people continue to celebrate it and if it becomes popular enough.

Actually, I believe Clinton sanctioned it a few years back.

Its popularity has nothing to do with its essence. If the grand wizard of the KKK started a holiday to celebrate white culture, and his slogan was "Think white, act white, talk white, etc", I'm sure people wouldn't be so accepting of it. Yet because Kwanzaa is black, we must be accepting of it or we are racists, despite its founder's history.

The KKK has a history of trying to Oppress, Kwanzanites(made that up) don't. So the slogan for the Kwanzanites has a totally different meaning and different goal than what the KKKs parallel.

You're making a mountain out of a molehill.

The black radical groups of the 60's, Kwanzaa's creator being a prominent leader of one of them, have a history of trying to advance their race through violence and racial isolation. While I realize that the two groups are different, the underlying themes of racial inequality and seperation are present in both.

That doesn't address the main difference:

1) the KKK is/was an attempt to Oppress a race of peoples, the result of another people(those who they would like to Oppress) gaining their Freedom.
2) the various groups created around the time of MLK and the Civil Rights movement were attempting to realize the Rights and Equality that had been granted to them some 100 years before.

Are you sympathetic to the cause of the KKK?

Please don't try to paint me as a racist, I've made it very clear that my argument is based on the motives for the holiday's creation, not because I have a problem with black people.

I realize the fundamental differences between the KKK and the black radicals, I was merely using them as a comparison for a similar situation which would be found socially unacceptable. Perhaps the KKK is a bit too extreme of an example group though. However, if any normal person were to suggest such a white holiday, he would probably be painted as a member of such group.

2) While I realize this is true, I still feel that racial isolation is not the solution to achieving such rights.
 

MacBaine

Banned
Aug 23, 2001
9,999
0
0
Originally posted by: illustri
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Well if I can find a Christian who thinks your version of Christmas is a sham, I guess that would only justify your stance on Kwanzaa.

So far you have explained your ideas on what does NOT constitute a real holiday. How about a quick numbered list of what prerequisites a "real" holiday needs.

Being able to state my opinion on what should not be a holiday does not require that I am able to produce a definition of what should be a holiday. There are countless reasons for a holiday to exist. There are also countless reasons that a holiday should NOT exist for. This is one of the latter.

dude you are arguing from a really negative stance, by which i mean not bad necessarily, but logically negative (wtf?)
meaning you come with an opinion that kwanzaa is deficit on the requirements of a holiday and expect us to fill that void to push it into credibility -- well unless anyone here ACTUALLY celebrates kwanzaa you're outa luck

i would personally keep my philisophy to live and let live, applicable to holidays as well as the freedom to believe whatever you want as long as i'm allowed the same

My stance is not based on what is required for a holiday to be considered legitimate, it is based on the motives for the creation of this holiday.
 

MacBaine

Banned
Aug 23, 2001
9,999
0
0
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Well if I can find a Christian who thinks your version of Christmas is a sham, I guess that would only justify your stance on Kwanzaa.

So far you have explained your ideas on what does NOT constitute a real holiday. How about a quick numbered list of what prerequisites a "real" holiday needs.

Being able to state my opinion on what should not be a holiday does not require that I am able to produce a definition of what should be a holiday. There are countless reasons for a holiday to exist. There are also countless reasons that a holiday should NOT exist for. This is one of the latter.

I'm sorry I thought you had an interesting argument for Kwanzaa not being a "real" holiday. Nice cop out though.

I'm sorry that I can't answer your unanswerable question. Unfortunately it seems that you're using this as an excuse to claim me defeated in my argument. Perhaps if you took the time to understand my stance rather than throw questions at me in an attempt to discredit my argument.... you may also understand that one doesn't need to be able to produce a definition of something in order to be able to state what it should not be.
 

illustri

Golden Member
Mar 14, 2001
1,490
0
0
the great thing about the US is that most people are tolerant of others freedoms and beliefs but get really miffed when talk of limiting said freedoms starts

following your argument to its conclusion would mean no holiday, no sanction, no celebration -- pushing some people even further into a "im oppressed mentality" which would even further increase the racial divisiveness and hatred you're railing against
 

Sid59

Lifer
Sep 2, 2002
11,879
3
81
lol .. you have yet to prove that Kwanzaa in it's origin, both in celebration and as a word represent racial isolation

again you are associating with the guy and not the event.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,770
6,336
126
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: sandorski
If people celebrate it, then it is a Holiday. Perhaps it isn't a sanctioned Holiday, but that will change if people continue to celebrate it and if it becomes popular enough.

Actually, I believe Clinton sanctioned it a few years back.

Its popularity has nothing to do with its essence. If the grand wizard of the KKK started a holiday to celebrate white culture, and his slogan was "Think white, act white, talk white, etc", I'm sure people wouldn't be so accepting of it. Yet because Kwanzaa is black, we must be accepting of it or we are racists, despite its founder's history.

The KKK has a history of trying to Oppress, Kwanzanites(made that up) don't. So the slogan for the Kwanzanites has a totally different meaning and different goal than what the KKKs parallel.

You're making a mountain out of a molehill.

The black radical groups of the 60's, Kwanzaa's creator being a prominent leader of one of them, have a history of trying to advance their race through violence and racial isolation. While I realize that the two groups are different, the underlying themes of racial inequality and seperation are present in both.

That doesn't address the main difference:

1) the KKK is/was an attempt to Oppress a race of peoples, the result of another people(those who they would like to Oppress) gaining their Freedom.
2) the various groups created around the time of MLK and the Civil Rights movement were attempting to realize the Rights and Equality that had been granted to them some 100 years before.

Are you sympathetic to the cause of the KKK?

Please don't try to paint me as a racist, I've made it very clear that my argument is based on the motives for the holiday's creation, not because I have a problem with black people.

I realize the fundamental differences between the KKK and the black radicals, I was merely using them as a comparison for a similar situation which would be found socially unacceptable. Perhaps the KKK is a bit too extreme of an example group though. However, if any normal person were to suggest such a white holiday, he would probably be painted as a member of such group.

2) While I realize this is true, I still feel that racial isolation is not the solution to achieving such rights.

Fair enough, I'll avoid the labeling.

I think Sid59 has a point though, in that you seem to be confusing Kwanza with the guy(or one of them) who popularized it in the US. To me(I don't celebrate Kwanza) it seems to be a celebration of an Ethnic/Racial groups heritage with the intent of helping that group rise above past wrongs done to that group. It is not used as a way to debase Whites, it is meant to make people proud of their heritage, to overcome an(or former) Institutionalized shame.

Often when AA or other race issue comes up, someone raises the issue of, "If Whites did that, then...". The problem with that arguement is that AA, this issue of Kwanza, and other Race issues are based around different perceptions of the issue. Up until the '60's Whites had 365 days/year of their own Heritage, the best Jobs, and basically everything centered around them. In order to acheive Equality, some of that had/has to be given up, it is primarily the loss of that which has caused the backlash amongst Whites. So don't play the victim until you are.