Fanatical Meat
Lifer
- Feb 4, 2009
- 34,554
- 15,766
- 136
Basically the press has three options when it comes to Trumps bullshit fabrications, none of them good.
1) Just report the statements Trump makes, in which case his fabrications will be taken as true
2) Report his fabrications but include statements indicating that others believe them to be false, in which case it makes settled issues seem to be controversial.
3) Indicate that his statements are just plain wrong and risk being pilloried as being biased against Trump, and so not to be trusted.
Fact checking Trump in real time would be seen as "war" by Donald. Not being "at war" with Trump would be letting him lie at will, and be a sign of weakness that he would only exploit. This has been going on over the last year.
As of now, the press as a whole has behaved with ratings and access in mind and not journalistic integrity. If you use the recent press charade/conference as an example, you have seen the future.
Journalists stepping over the corpses of their comrades in the hope that THEIR network gets to ask the question that the Baffoon-in-Chief answers. You can't piss the guy off or he might not ever call on you again. Maybe ban you from the room.
The press should demand actual answers to actual questions. If he refuses to answer a valid question from one reporter the next should ask the same question. If he flat out lies or contradicts himself, which he seems to do on a daily basis, he should be called out on it. If its about gowns for bestest inauguration ball ever. But if its about any of the thousand important issues, his feet need to be held to the fire, if not in it. I have little hope that the mainstream media does this until there exists overwhelming and undeniable evidence that he or his administration have screwed up bigly. Then they'll all jump on the bandwagon and say what a good job they did.
I'll take option #3