Are you dumb enough to actually make the statement that you think I am lying about people being able to join the military or the police at the age of 16 in this country? For real? I don't even know how to respond to such a stupid statement made by you in something so easy to look up.
I can find nothing that supports those claims. Please help me out with some links.
There aren't any because it's a lie, pulled from his ass. To join the military at 16 years old would require emancipation from the teenager's parents. It isn't as if any teenager can just drop out of HS and their parents can sign off for them to join ranks. You would need to have full rights of an adult @ 16.
And his claim of, "oh, it JUST changed since when *I* was in..." is also bullshit. My best friend joined the USMC in the late 90s and while he could sign the papers at the age of 17, they wouldn't accept him to ship off to bootcamp until after his 18th, so yeah. He's a fucking liar...shocker.
It doesn't work like that, and he probably knows it. He's just flinging shit at the wall. Just because you can join State police in some random southern state where it's also legal to marry your cousin, doesn't mean it applies to military forces.
Again, only straw purchase if the intent was for the firearm to be owned permanently by Rittenhouse. The fact it was kept stored at Black's house after purchase, along with all other guns purchased at the time, is a defense against the straw purchase.
Again...already established that the gun was purchased FOR him, with money FROM him, and would be stored at the purchaser's home because...I'm guessing his parents didn't want him having it in their home? IDK. But the gun belonged to Rittenhouse. BTW, Rittenhouse was a side-topic, and not the topic of the thread.
Lie about what? I literally said Wisconsin has legal exemptions for possession of a firearm for those under 18.
And you fail to specify with any detail what those exemptions are. Namely, a minor may possess and carry a firearm (long rifle)
IN THE PRESENCE AND UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THEIR LEGAL, ADULT GUARDIAN. You know, like for legitimate reasons like...deer hunting. Not going armed to protests. Big fucking difference, so good job leaving out the details that show you are full of shit, clown.
I already linked fricking article from the Washingpost about gun ownership ages in this country. At one point it was mandatory for every man, woman, AND CHILD in this country to own their own firearms in the case there was a need. That went on for almost 100 years.
And this is still relevant and necessary today because...subjective reasons? Do these laws still exist in the same form? NO. Fuck off, clown.
Again, I am not the one making the defense for Rittenhouse's possession charge at this point. I said there was a defense. I don't care to fucking do someone else's homework to look up what the defense is planning here.
Then stfu and stop claiming you know the details. Also, Rittenhouse isn't the thread topic, btw.
It looks like the lower limit age for military joining was raised from 16, during my time in, to 17 recently.
Bullshit. Show me when it was changed from 16 to 17 or stop your lying.
Never said that. I said there are exceptions in Wisconsin law to possession of a firearm by those under 18. Go re-read what I wrote dumbass. That statement is not stating that those exceptions may apply. But good try at another strawman fallacy. Damn you are full of them still as usual.
You mean the exception that he could have legally carried that rifle if HIS LEGAL GUARDIAN was present? That lil detail you conveniently discluded from your bullshit claim? Yeah.
Yes. I was arguing against stupidity brought by you and others.
You are arguing just to argue, and using falsities to try to "prove" your points.
You: "It's so obvious and easy to find, I'm not going to do your homework for you to disprove all the bullshit I'm flinging! I'll make you link it yourself just to prove me a liar and wrong!"
You are a dishonest clown. Fuck off.
