Originally posted by: herkulease
Originally posted by: Gibson486
I thought the whole point was that that first scene was 10 years later while the rest of the movie was a flashback. It explains why the kid was going to be hung (son of a pirate) and why he knew the song. If that was not the case, would it of hurt them to hire another kid for $10k?
You could be right however, as one of the characters they show (beckett?) is in that beginning scene when infact he dies (although, we only know he is left floating at the sea...no confirmation of death)
Yes, Callipso was the storm.
I don't see how the beginning could be 20 years ago and the story being a flash back. didn't the little british guy order the suspension of various rights that most Americans should know and hung all those associated with pirates?
Jack has the map to was used to bring him back. Other than the voodoo lady who was set free no one knows how to bring the british guy back from the dead.
Letting Norrington, the guy elizabeth was supposed to marry from #1 come back seems more reasonable as he switched sides and helped elizabeth get off the flying dutchman.
I'm leaning towards the studio being cheap. pay the kid few thousand and they can film all his scenes in an hour or two at best. heck it wouldn't surprised me if it they put out a call for kids to work for free. capitalizing on the fact that some parents would do it figuring how big the whole pirates series has been.