pics.bbzzdd.com rollback to 2.x

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
DivideBYZero

DivideBYZero

Lifer
May 18, 2001
24,117
2
0
The clicky-clicky interface does suck. The speed with which you could browse in 2.xx was the best thing about it. I like the 3.xx 'look' tho.
 
T

thereds

Diamond Member
Apr 4, 2000
7,886
0
0
Originally posted by: Nik
The new version kicks ass as far as features go. You said in another thread that the problem is being fixed for those who complain about speed issues. What IS that problem and how is it being fixed?

If you can speed up thew current version, that would be ideal. The old version didn't have the features and functionality.
Click to expand...

Surprised you didn't say that this belonged in the Software forum.
 

I hope people realize some features will be lost (NSFW tagging, advanced search, etc...)
 
T

thereds

Diamond Member
Apr 4, 2000
7,886
0
0
Originally posted by: dwell
I hope people realize some features will be lost (NSFW tagging, advanced search, etc...)
Click to expand...

We'd give up a lot more than that for speed and no more 3-clickers.
 
meltdown75

meltdown75

Lifer
Nov 17, 2004
37,548
7
81
i guess i should voice my minority opinion...

i liked the new interface better, such as the mouse-over thumbnails. overall, i just thought it was a more useful interface i guess.
 
I

imported_Phil

Diamond Member
Feb 10, 2001
9,837
0
0
Roll back, please.

While I applaud the effort that Dan has put into v3, I think he should have stopped halfway through ;)
 
F

FreshPrince

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2001
8,361
1
0
so...when will the install package be out? I mean if bandwidth is such an issue, why not allow other ATOT'ers help you out by creating pics2.bbzzdd.com, pics3.bbzzdd.com, and pics4.bbzzdd.com

or better yet, use round robin dns and just load balance pics.bbzzdd.com

that way, you can host a copy of the site there, and I can host a copy here...we can share the load?
 

That's another thing. Dan was not going to release his code under the GPL or as freeware.
 

Originally posted by: FreshPrince
or better yet, use round robin dns and just load balance pics.bbzzdd.com

that way, you can host a copy of the site there, and I can host a copy here...we can share the load?
Click to expand...

That's another thing, this is not Google or something where you would need load-balancing. For years it worked fine on a Celeron system. As soon as the feature bloat crept in that's when performance started to suck. I am of the opinion that you should not need a supercomputer or load balancer to run a simple picture hosting site.
 
F

FreshPrince

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2001
8,361
1
0
Originally posted by: dwell
Originally posted by: FreshPrince
or better yet, use round robin dns and just load balance pics.bbzzdd.com

that way, you can host a copy of the site there, and I can host a copy here...we can share the load?
Click to expand...

That's another thing, this is not Google or something where you would need load-balancing. For years it worked fine on a Celeron system. As soon as the feature bloat crept in that's when performance started to suck. I am of the opinion that you should not need a supercomputer or load balancer to run a simple picture hosting site.
Click to expand...

:(
 
S

SSP

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
17,727
0
0
I just want to thank the guys who worked on version 3. Your hard work is really appreciated. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom