it tastes different.
and, yes, it is somewhat healthier for you (for lack of a better term). 50% fructose as opposed to 55% fructose. after a while, it adds up and your resistance to insulin will decrease.
LATE PASS
But yeah most people can pick up on the difference. ZeroCool evidently takes his carbonated beverages via enema and therefore cannot taste the obvious distinction
Yes, there is a tremendous difference in taste. Anyone who claims to not be able to tell the difference either hasn't tried it and is just lying about it, or has tried it and it lying about it.
Hey, let's not leave out the people who swear they can tell the difference between cane and beet sugar. Ever wondered who began the so called HFCS controversy?
They have real sugar coke in Canada and I think it tastes like crap. I love me some hfcs.
the "so called HFCS" thing isn't about hfcs being particularly bad health wise it is about how the bulk of what we eat coming from corn being fucked up in general.
They have real sugar coke in Canada and I think it tastes like crap. I love me some hfcs.
So why do companies continue to use HFCS? Is sugar that much expensive? two fold?
I don't understand how there could much of a taste difference. The glucose:fructose profile between sucrose sodas and HFCS sodas is similar, or at least they should be unless they changed the formula with sucrose.
Unlike many people, I never made the wrong choice in the "Pepsi Challenge" either.
I had no problem telling Coca-Cola from Pepsi-Cola...
Don't start that ridiculous shit again.
This year tastes different to me. I swear it tasted like Coke without the aftertaste last year, but this year it tastes like somewhat watered down Pepsi.