Ya harvey, I know you said you are 72, I just rounded down, thought you would appreciate it. It just makes it more comical anyway, 72 and still having pissing matches online. Add to that all your 'accomplishments' and its even more laughable how you choose to now spend your once overpriced time.
You keep claiming that I am copying and pasting something, and you know where it comes from. Please post the quotes from the websites I copy and paste from. *hint, you wont be able to because my posts are my own words.
Brag much online? haha You must have felt quite insecure to be moved to type a big paragraph on who you know and what theyve done and what youve done leading into a nice ad hominem. *note thats what the loser does in any debate. Ill leave the apostrophes off my contractions so you have something legitamate to make yourself feel good about noticing and correcting me on. Maybe you can find some spelling mistakes too for extra credit.
As far as convincing anyone of anything, well, I wont have to because you have already embarrassed yourself enough with your typical conflated emotional liberal rant. How much have you had to drink tonight anyway? haha.
You keep mentioning conservative talk show hosts to serve as strawmen for you. They arent my heroes, but keep trying to put me in a group if it makes you feel safer. Thats how you liberals think. Groups. All the while protesting putting people in groups and putting labels on them, preaching tolerance etc. How hypocritical.
Im not going to brag online about my accomplishments except to say I havent sold my soul to the machine, and I've realized the great battle this nation is in which is more than I can say for you. You speak of the constitution yet everything liberals believe in goes against it. Legislating from the bench. What are your conversations like? How to legislate from the bench? How to 'interpret' it to make it favorable to the leftist regime? How to make some nice 'case law' that can be used later by some other leftist judge in some other case?
Yes Ive read the constitution, the irony being the purpose of the constitution is to control and limit the governments behavior, not the people, something the left is always trying to work around. What about free speech? How are you liking that right about now? Do you want to call it 'hate speech' and create a law against it to punish people who think differently than you, who have arrived at different conclusions than you have? Of course you do, you are a liberal?
Yes I actually know a lot about you. Because you freely post it here in this forum, and because there are so many like you in the world. Ive met many such as yourself. For starters, I notice you love to say how you think you are better than everyone, so superior, so intelligent, so full of your self. You arent what you think you are. I hate to be the one to tell you that since sociopaths get dangerous when their delusion is challenged. It doesnt matter anyway, the only thing that matters is the substance of your argument which is pretty much non-existent once all the self centered drivel is taken away.
You think there arent as many lawyers on the other side, just as accomplished, just as opinionated that disagree with the liberal world view? What of them? Are you oh so superior to them as well?
Your elite leftist arrogance is typical. What did you call it, 'education', don't you mean 'brainwashed'. What was that word you used, 'ethically qualified'?. Ironic word choice from a lawyer don't you think? They are the least ethical group on the planet and Im sure the majoriy of americans would agree in an anonymous poll. It would have to be anonymous to be accurate because people would be too afraid to answer honestly in public. That alone proves the point.
Does the word 'genetic' frighten you? or do you just want others to be afraid so you can control them? Typical liberal conflation. You guys love your buzz words. It scares the followers and keeps them nice and maleable.
The theory that I speak of is just a way to possibly explain how equally educated and intelligent people can disagree so diametrically and so equally across the entire planet. Do you know what ethnicity I am? Who is sterotyping who? You are. Shame on you liberal. Heres some fodder for you. If you like lawyers, someone I do like is Larry Elder. While I dont agree with some things and he certainly wouldn't agree with some of my views, its a good place for you to start if you are sincere in understanding the other side. If your pride wont let you accept it from me, maybe you will consider his viewpoint since he is one of your own. (a lawyer)
Regarding fake stats liberals like to use the unemployment stats. They use the number of people collecting unemployment insurance to show how many people are unemployed. This stat shows the economy doing much better than it actually is. What about the people who use up all their unemployment and still cant get a job? They dont show up on that stat. As a lawyer you know that stats can be used to prove anything so dont play dumb. You know politicians use fake stats to control the minds of the masses especially those carrying the gullible lliberal follower gene.
Getting back to the topic of this thread, as far as facts, its well known the stat for women making less than men is just the difference between the average full time earnings of all working men and women. Even you should be able to see that this does not show discrimination since it doesnt take into consideration the hours worked or chosen profession and a myriad of other variables. To say that women make less money FOR THE SAME WORK, is false to be sure and at least safe to say is not supported.
Facebook
Twitter