• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Paris attacks thread garbage

s0me0nesmind1 said:
So after things like this, will europe learn to pull up their panties, stop bending over, and actually mobilize their military for attacking instead of defending and having people slaughtered? It's things like this that seem to be a kick to their ass indicating "WAKE THE FUCK UP. We can't clean up your mess"
Click to expand...


ok. Lets talk about because liberals now.
 
brycejones said:
So sayeth the truth seeker. Why don't we let ole' rudder explain or are you and he the same person?
Click to expand...


Because everyone with two brain cells knows what he is talking about what Sean Hannity and his ilk bring it up every single day. Every. Single. Day.
 
Last edited:
s0me0nesmind1 said:
So after things like this, will Europe learn to pull up their panties, stop bending over, and actually mobilize their military for attacking instead of defending and having people slaughtered? It's things like this that seem to be a kick to their ass indicating "WAKE THE FUCK UP. We can't clean up your mess"



Agreed. They should have done that hours ago. The moment they start shooting is the moment it's no longer a hostage situation. It's a bloodbath situation.

You want to use them as leverage for something - use them as leverage. The moment you shoot a single person is when you clearly aren't looking for anything.
Click to expand...


Bu... bu... but... doesn't France have strict gun control?
 
CZroe said:
Bu... bu... but... doesn't France have strict gun control?
Click to expand...

Shut your fucking mouth and start using your fucking brain for once. If you think it would be much more difficult for terrorists with automatic kalashnikovs, bullet-proof vests, and grenades to take down a few 72 year old men with pistols than you are sorely mistaken. Plus they only need to be on guard once, you need to be on guard your whole life. With how much you seem to get involved with science you ought to know smarter than to listen to Sean Hannity and other bullshit.
 
oh good lets have a gun rights argument too. Can we mix a bit of abortion and bible passages into it as well?
 
I can't believe the partisan bickering here. You guys can't even focus on a common enemy. Some of you have no class whatsoever.
 
norseamd said:
Shut your fucking mouth and start using your fucking brain for once. If you think it would be much more difficult for terrorists with automatic kalashnikovs, bullet-proof vests, and grenades to take down a few 72 year old men with pistols than you are sorely mistaken. Plus they only need to be on guard once, you need to be on guard your whole life. With how much you seem to get involved with science you ought to know smarter than to listen to Sean Hannity and other bullshit.
Click to expand...

I don't listen to Sean Hannity. :colbert: I can't stand the guy.
JSt0rm said:
oh good lets have a gun rights argument too. Can we mix a bit of abortion and bible passages into it as well?
Click to expand...

This is exactly the kind of thing that argument applies to. You're only willing to discuss it when there isn't a perfectly current example of "bad people will still get guns?"
 
norseamd said:
Shut your fucking mouth and start using your fucking brain for once. If you think it would be much more difficult for terrorists with automatic kalashnikovs, bullet-proof vests, and grenades to take down a few 72 year old men with pistols than you are sorely mistaken. Plus they only need to be on guard once, you need to be on guard your whole life. With how much you seem to get involved with science you ought to know smarter than to listen to Sean Hannity and other bullshit.
Click to expand...

You're defending the murders of 60 people.
 
CZroe said:
I don't listen to Sean Hannity. :colbert: I can't stand the guy.


This is exactly the kind of thing that argument applies to. You're only willing to discuss it when there isn't a perfectly current example of "bad people will still get guns?"
Click to expand...

yes please continue with your gun rights argument.
 
CZroe said:
You don't think that disarmed citizens factored into their plans at all? It certainly factors in to plans when we have a mass-shooting here. It's why they usually happen at schools and why the Aurora shooter chose a movie theater that doesn't allow guns.
Click to expand...

The aurora shooter did not choose a movie theater because it didn't allow guns. There is no evidence for that. There's also no evidence that an armed populace played into any decisions here.

This argument against gun control is terrible. Not only is the evidence for it weak to nonexistent, but it ignores how many people would likely die each year due to expanded gun availability.
 
norseamd said:
And they probably had body armor, automatic weapons, and explosives too, plus they have probably had formal education in terrorism.
Click to expand...

They may not be Eric and Dylan (who also had those things) but they didn't have the manpower for professionalism to factor much.
 
eskimospy said:
The aurora shooter did not choose a movie theater because it didn't allow guns. There is no evidence for that. There's also no evidence that an armed populace played into any decisions here.
Click to expand...
True but I ignore the "no concealed weapons" signs every time I go to the movies.😛 The tards don't even post them according to S.C. law.🙄
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top