• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Paedophile punched in the face

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: dxkj
What a wuss, he let the lawyer manhandle him and hold him for the cops

I wouldn't mind being held down by the lawyer after I got a few good shots off on a pedo. I would have laughed really, really loud the entire time and kept taunting the guy while he lay on the ground crying.
 
I have a serious question now, I'm not trying to start anything.

Is it just because the priest/highly religious pedophiles get the most attention, or is there a definate increase in the amounts of pedophilic priests and such as of late?

It seems like I hear about it more and more, but is there a real increase in such behavior, or is it just on the news more now?
 
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: redly1
pedofile, not Paedophile

and hahaha....I love how before the he smacks the "accused", he's hauling ass down the sidewalk like a powerwalker

It's paedophile.

Both versions are valid, just like color and colour, favorite and favourite, etc.
 
Originally posted by: Continuity28
I have a serious question now, I'm not trying to start anything.

Is it just because the priest/highly religious pedophiles get the most attention, or is there a definate increase in the amounts of pedophilic priests and such as of late?

It seems like I hear about it more and more, but is there a real increase in such behavior, or is it just on the news more now?

I suspect that the profession has (alas) attracted pedophiles for a long time- it is a position of power of children. The teaching profession calls quite a number of them as well.

I hope that this hypocrite gets a roomie who uses him worse than he used those little girls.
 
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: redly1
pedofile, not Paedophile

and hahaha....I love how before the he smacks the "accused", he's hauling ass down the sidewalk like a powerwalker

It's paedophile.

Not in the good ol' barely English speaking US of A. 🙂 Doncha know one of our missions in life is to remove any extraneous letters from English words. Paedophile=pedophile, colour=color, honour=honor. 😀
 
Originally posted by: Biggerhammer
Originally posted by: Continuity28
I have a serious question now, I'm not trying to start anything.

Is it just because the priest/highly religious pedophiles get the most attention, or is there a definate increase in the amounts of pedophilic priests and such as of late?

It seems like I hear about it more and more, but is there a real increase in such behavior, or is it just on the news more now?

I suspect that the profession has (alas) attracted pedophiles for a long time- it is a position of power of children. The teaching profession calls quite a number of them as well.

I hope that this hypocrite gets a roomie who uses him worse than he used those little girls.

That's a very good point. Positions of power and trust would be ideal for this, I guess.

So you believe that the numbers over time were/are pretty consistant, just in the light more often now because of similar scandals? Or possibly an increase of pedophilia on a worldwide scale over time? 🙁
 
Originally posted by: allisolm
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: redly1
pedofile, not Paedophile

and hahaha....I love how before the he smacks the "accused", he's hauling ass down the sidewalk like a powerwalker

It's paedophile.

Not in the good ol' barely English speaking US of A. 🙂 Doncha know one of our missions in life is to remove any extraneous letters from English words. Paedophile=pedophile, colour=color, honour=honor. 😀

'honour' should be 'onor' 😛
 
'honour' should be 'onor'

No, no, no - we need the "h". Without it we wouldn't have all the confusion about whether it's supposed to be "an honor" or "a honor" and, while we don't approve of extra letters, we're all for confusion. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: allisolm
'honour' should be 'onor'

No, no, no - we need the "h". Without it we wouldn't have all the confusion about whether it's supposed to be "an honor" or "a honor" and, while we don't approve of extra letters, we're all for confusion. 🙂

Don't forget those crazy Zs! 😉

realise -> realize
generalise -> generalize
 
Originally posted by: Bumrush99
AWESOME!! That f*cker deserved it, however it would have been nice to see him punched in the balls too

Punched? Most people have more muscle on their legs, how about a nice swift kick! 😛
 
Originally posted by: Continuity28
That's a very good point. Positions of power and trust would be ideal for this, I guess.

So you believe that the numbers over time were/are pretty consistant, just in the light more often now because of similar scandals? Or possibly an increase of pedophilia on a worldwide scale over time? 🙁
I suspect that pedophilia has always been around- but back in the days where a girl got married at 16 or younger, the freaks could 'legitimately' do their thing.

I don't think that pedophilia is environmental. There's something wrong inside the pedophile. So I tend to doubt that there are more of them now, per capita, than there have been in earlier times. We just have much more access to information so we hear more about them.
 
Originally posted by: Continuity28
Originally posted by: allisolm
'honour' should be 'onor'

No, no, no - we need the "h". Without it we wouldn't have all the confusion about whether it's supposed to be "an honor" or "a honor" and, while we don't approve of extra letters, we're all for confusion. 🙂

Don't forget those crazy Zs! 😉

realise -> realize
generalise -> generalize

Those are Zeds, you fool!
 
Originally posted by: Biggerhammer
Originally posted by: Continuity28
That's a very good point. Positions of power and trust would be ideal for this, I guess.

So you believe that the numbers over time were/are pretty consistant, just in the light more often now because of similar scandals? Or possibly an increase of pedophilia on a worldwide scale over time? 🙁
I suspect that pedophilia has always been around- but back in the days where a girl got married at 16 or younger, the freaks could 'legitimately' do their thing.

I don't think that pedophilia is environmental. There's something wrong inside the pedophile. So I tend to doubt that there are more of them now, per capita, than there have been in earlier times. We just have much more access to information so we hear more about them.

Pedersty has been around for at least 2.5 millenia. Some of the Mediterranean cultures practiced it quite often, even with the same gender. Some marriages were consummated at very, very young ages. But now that are society is less patriarchal and more educated, we know that it can seriously traumatize children, partly because of social stigma, but also developmentally kids just aren't mature physically for that yet, much less mentally.
 
I tend to see pedophiles as more predatory than this. The fact that it messes the kid up later is probably not the first thing on the punchee's mind.
 
Originally posted by: Biggerhammer
Originally posted by: Continuity28
That's a very good point. Positions of power and trust would be ideal for this, I guess.

So you believe that the numbers over time were/are pretty consistant, just in the light more often now because of similar scandals? Or possibly an increase of pedophilia on a worldwide scale over time? 🙁
I suspect that pedophilia has always been around- but back in the days where a girl got married at 16 or younger, the freaks could 'legitimately' do their thing.

I don't think that pedophilia is environmental. There's something wrong inside the pedophile. So I tend to doubt that there are more of them now, per capita, than there have been in earlier times. We just have much more access to information so we hear more about them.

Noting the bolded part above: That is not necessarily an indication of pedophilia. People lose sight of the fact that pedophilia is the sexual attraction to children who have not yet developed secondary sexual characteristics, regardless of actual age. So having sex with a 14 year old girl is probably not pedophilia in most cases. (Not that it's "right", but it's not pedophilia.)
 
Originally posted by: redly1
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: redly1
pedofile, not Paedophile

and hahaha....I love how before the he smacks the "accused", he's hauling ass down the sidewalk like a powerwalker

It's paedophile.


really??

"ae" is used to replace æ, just as "ss" is used to replace ß.

Both spellings are relevent, so lets not argue over that. 😛
 
Back
Top