Pack of 10 gorillas versus one male lion

Page 12 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
It's not an opinion. Mean is another term for average.

When they say "mean weight" they are saying "average weight", it's the same thing.
Go look up mean, median and mode.

I don't consider that weight figure a average since brown bears/kodiaks generally are smaller than 835 pounds as Common, 500-700 are there averages stated on multiple books that I provided, in comparisons to lions, 350-550 is there averages, 600 pounders are still not un-common and are what most who examine there weight figures consider there larger mean=Prime weights, excluding the fact that lions can get much larger depending on food intake, which is more than twice there weights from comparing averages to max 409 as there average and 1,000 as there max.

I don't see how the bear can be any different, his averages as brown bears are from 400-700 including all grizzlys sub-species, obese indivdiuals by doubling there weight as well, is still on the extreme of only 1,000-1,300 and thats pushing it since no bear has still yet to have been confirmed in a proper weighing method.
 

Soundmanred

Lifer
Oct 26, 2006
10,780
6
81
It's not an opinion. Mean is another term for average.

When they say "mean weight" they are saying "average weight", it's the same thing.
Go look up mean, median and mode.
FACTS:
Mean is how a grilla is felling.
Median is when a grilla is in midle of rode.
Mode is if grilla is a robot or looks like a grilla (like in Transofrmes!).
Consider your tradishunal meanings to be ram-shacked! You got scooled.
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
You posted it.

Regardless, mean means average. That's what that column is. Average weight.

I guess so then, thats only for one census, I was in general speaking of there overall take, implimenting there averages more so in the 700 range:
http://books.google.com/books?id=My...a=X&ei=FtMeUq7MM-S3igK40YCYDg&ved=0CBkQ6AEwAw

Still think that a 800-900 pound Kodiak is considered a prime specimen while the other 1,100 pounders and up are no way fit and in there prime let alone even accurate since the method of weighing them is flawed.

Since as stated by that kodiak census from the shaggy god proboards highlights there abnormal food abundentcys in rich vegatation, more food for any animal means more weight of course, but the bear like all herbivores and some omnivores are prone to obesity since there food supply most of the time are infinite. Thats why it is hard to determine what is obese and what isn't...hence the record of the heaviest human is 1,320 pounds just because you cut his weight in half doesn't make it the average, not even close.
 

natto fire

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2000
7,117
10
76
OK, this thread speaks volumes of just how bad this forum is. Didn't bother to read a bit of it. How the hell can anyone taking an "interest" in this thread actually be getting laid? I'm fucking serious because we should all step back and realize how retarded this is.

Pissing contests are cool and all, but if you piss in a vagina then you are guaranteed to not be getting that for a long time. I am actually a fan of vagina in a non-chauvinistic way, and as such do not enter pissing contests. I probably miss out on some choice tail, but bitches that are impressed by the douche alpha male shtick are below me anyways.
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
Well, you could do two things, have this thread closed, or not look into it, either way is fine by me.

Just trying to find out some scoops on what some others have to bring to the table...sort of a dull subject since its main reason wasn't thought out...more so just a sad troll attempt in redeeming how humilated he was, so he has to come up with ways to get my attention and stack up idiotic hypotheticals, in this case others have already chastised and made an ass out of him; for it had back fire'd on him and making me the all more L-ing.mao...but it is what it is.

Had a few laughs, but I agree; close this P.O.S down.
 
Last edited:

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,576
11,715
136
OK, this thread speaks volumes of just how bad this forum is. Didn't bother to read a bit of it. How the hell can anyone taking an "interest" in this thread actually be getting laid? I'm fucking serious because we should all step back and realize how retarded this is.

Pissing contests are cool and all, but if you piss in a vagina then you are guaranteed to not be getting that for a long time. I am actually a fan of vagina in a non-chauvinistic way, and as such do not enter pissing contests. I probably miss out on some choice tail, but bitches that are impressed by the douche alpha male shtick are below me anyways.

:D you seem to be under the misapprehension that more than one person is taking this thread seriously.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
:D you seem to be under the misapprehension that more than one person is taking this thread seriously.

lol :) I was hilariously entertained by the complete misinterpretation of the word 'mean' in mathematical context. That's the thing about basic math, there's no 'opinion' about it :D
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
lol :) I was hilariously entertained by the complete misinterpretation of the word 'mean' in mathematical context. That's the thing about basic math, there's no 'opinion' about it :D

I guess misinterperting it had its moment, yet still by memorie I do see alot of the word 'mean weight' also meaning prime or above averages since one fact remains in terms mathematics, there is no definite average in bear weights since almost none are actually weighed, and for lions; being social scatters the average weight since they live in prides there weights will never be consistant as a solitary animals would, the lions weight fluctuates more than any other large predator.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,576
11,715
136
I guess misinterperting it had its moment, yet still by memorie I do see alot of the word 'mean weight' also meaning prime or above averages since one fact remains in terms mathematics, there is no definite average in bear weights since almost none are actually weighed, and for lions; being social scatters the average weight since they live in prides there weights will never be consistant as a solitary animals would, the lions weight fluctuates more than any other large predator.

Mean weight always means average weight, unless the person writing it doesn't understand what they are talking about.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,994
31,557
146
I guess misinterperting it had its moment, yet still by memorie I do see alot of the word 'mean weight' also meaning prime or above averages since one fact remains in terms mathematics, there is no definite average in bear weights since almost none are actually weighed, and for lions; being social scatters the average weight since they live in prides there weights will never be consistant as a solitary animals would, the lions weight fluctuates more than any other large predator.

jesus christ--you really don't know a god damn thing, do you?
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
This feels a little dirty, you peeping at my profile and all.

Looks like I win again.

Having a hunch, that the person I repeativly own and humilate is viewing the thread just because he/you is stuck in a paradox of infinite time of trying to make half ass come backs...so I check if my theory/hunch is correct, and belive me its worth it...

Since...

Even till now; hours later, your profile shows that you're still stuck on trying to fromulate a come back, XD XD XD...whaw howlee's.

Thanks mate, thanks for proving me right that your just a troll trying to redeem every reply I slapped you silly; you don't know when to quit, so I might just leave you be, in your idiotic pathetic excuse to make up retarded comebacks that has no merits or as welshblok would love to hear...

Meanings.

lol
 
Last edited:

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
You guess wrong.

And you can't estimate random numbers, they're random.

Phew, the stupidity is just radiating through this post, if some one estimated bart the bear to be 1,700 pounds plus, how is it not random?

It has no support, other then a method that is...guessing, hence its random.
 

natto fire

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2000
7,117
10
76
So glad I can continue my high school fantasies 13 years later. The cliques, the singling out, thanks ATOT! You remind me my differences are nothing compared to the difference I can belittle on other people!
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,576
11,715
136
Phew, the stupidity is just radiating through this post, if some one estimated bart the bear to be 1,700 pounds plus, how is it not random?

It's not random because it's an estimate of the bears weight.
If it was random it would have nothing to do with the bears weight.

Estimate =/= random
Mean = average
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,576
11,715
136
So glad I can continue my high school fantasies 13 years later. The cliques, the singling out, thanks ATOT! You remind me my differences are nothing compared to the difference I can belittle on other people!

Chill, no need to go through life so angry.

If you don't like the thread don't read it, no point in raging about it.
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
It's not random because it's an estimate of the bears weight.
If it was random it would have nothing to do with the bears weight.

Estimate =/= random
Mean = average

Good to see you rely on estimates/random figures, next time I'll go quoting childrens books that some lions have been estimated at 4,000 pounds, and citing people that have never seen a bear ever...pah, a hundred similar words can protain to the same concept...hence Estimate/Random has the same formalitys an can mean/protain to the same thing.

Sorry but I stay in whats more factual and logical not wishful thinking...since lion weights have a accurate method using the concept of the libra scale, while a kid with a modern weighing scale could debunk a whole centurys worth of bullshit so call scientist random Estimates
 
Last edited:

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,576
11,715
136
Good to see you rely on estimates/random figures, next time I'll go quoting childrens books that some lions have been estimated at 4,000 pounds, and citing people that have never seen a bear ever...pah, a hundred similar words can protain to the same concept...hence Estimate/Random has the same formalitys an can mean/protain to the same thing.

Sorry but I stay in whats more factual and logical not wishful thinking...since lion weights have a accurate method using the concept of the libra scale, while a kid with a modern weighing scale could debunk a whole centurys worth of bullshit so call scientist random Estimates

Estimate and random don't mean the same thing.

I don't know what else your wittering about in that post but just try to understand that simple fact.
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
Estimate and random don't mean the same thing.

I don't know what else your wittering about in that post but just try to understand that simple fact.

The fact that you are a dumb fucking troll?

Yeah we learned/covered that already.

I don't know why you are still breathing either.
 
Last edited:

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,576
11,715
136
The fact that you are a dumb fucking troll?

Yeah we learned/covered that already.

I don't know why you are still breathing either.

No point getting mad about it.

Do you now understand the difference between random and estimated numbers? Would you like it explained more?

You've grasped the mean=average thing yes?
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
No point getting mad about it.

Do you now understand the difference between random and estimated numbers? Would you like it explained more?

You've grasped the mean=average thing yes?

Dude I'm not mad, in fact I'm happy that I get to put you in your place. I just like talking to you how you wanna be adressed, you know this already, the T vs L thread is a star shining brite in how much you're a troll.

So as they say...Troll on you twat.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.